Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uh Oh... 'Clinton Foundation Taking Funds From Foreign Governments, Keystone XL Group' - FDL [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)54. It would be wrong if any of that money made it's way into the hands of the Clintons.
Pres Clinton has had paid "advisory" positions with companies that manage or consult with the foundation.
By 2011, the firm (Teneo) had added a third partner, Declan Kelly, a former State Department envoy for Mrs. Clinton. And Mr. Clinton had signed up as a paid adviser to the firm.
Teneo worked on retainer, charging monthly fees as high as $250,000, according to current and former clients. The firm recruited clients who were also Clinton Foundation donors, while Mr. Band and Mr. Kelly encouraged others to become new foundation donors. Its marketing materials highlighted Mr. Bands relationship with Mr. Clinton and the Clinton Global Initiative, where Mr. Band sat on the board of directors through 2011 and remains an adviser. Some Clinton aides and foundation employees began to wonder where the foundation ended and Teneo began.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Teneo worked on retainer, charging monthly fees as high as $250,000, according to current and former clients. The firm recruited clients who were also Clinton Foundation donors, while Mr. Band and Mr. Kelly encouraged others to become new foundation donors. Its marketing materials highlighted Mr. Bands relationship with Mr. Clinton and the Clinton Global Initiative, where Mr. Band sat on the board of directors through 2011 and remains an adviser. Some Clinton aides and foundation employees began to wonder where the foundation ended and Teneo began.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/14/us/politics/unease-at-clinton-foundation-over-finances-and-ambitions.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Remember the Clintons were broke in 2000 and now have an estimated $100 million which places them well into the 0.01% class.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uh Oh... 'Clinton Foundation Taking Funds From Foreign Governments, Keystone XL Group' - FDL [View all]
WillyT
Feb 2015
OP
The Clinton Foundation is for charitable causes. It doesn't line the Clintons' pockets. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#8
And Im sure that the keystone company donated millions out od the goodness of their heart
Travis_0004
Feb 2015
#11
until such a time you prove it's a slush fund, I'll just consider that statement bullshit.
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#20
ah, getting desperate, name calling. That's all you've got. All you've EVER had.
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#22
I've already read those. Doesn't come close to making your point (if you actually have one)
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#37
I don't see anything illegal or unethical. If I missed them, quote the passages.
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#39
there's that 'progressive' psychic 'I just know it' truthiness evidence again.
wyldwolf
Feb 2015
#43
What? Non-profits can make a profit. I work for a non-profit and occasionally we make
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#45
I'm sure the Clinton's will return such funds with a stern look of disapproval.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2015
#9
Since the Clinton foundation focuses on helping lots of nations what in the hell is wrong with
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#12
It would be wrong if any of that money made it's way into the hands of the Clintons.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#54
Are you going to say this about Warren in her claim of spending $42M on her campaign and she took
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#55
I don't think the Clintons represent the 99%. I think their ties to Big Bankers
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#56
Then you don't know much about the Clintons. Do you think the people they are helping is in the
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#57
Mitt Romney donates to charity also, that alone doesn't mean a thing. If you steal
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#58
You seem to be having a hard time admitting the Clintons has helped many people
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#60
I don't hate the Clintons. When you make that claim you ruin any decent argument you might have.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#61