Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Las Vegas Republican calls for ‘hot little girls’ to be armed to stop campus rapes [View all]Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)38. Depends on your definition of 'work'.
If by 'work' you mean absolutely prevent anyone from using drugs, then sure, the answer is no.
As I said, there are always idiots and libertarians around. But the vast majority of Americans aren't methheads, aren't doing coke or heroin.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Las Vegas Republican calls for ‘hot little girls’ to be armed to stop campus rapes [View all]
DonViejo
Feb 2015
OP
The mind boggles. Should toddlers be given guns to ward off pedophiles?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2015
#1
And yet, anyone seriously suggesting such a thing would be laughed out of the room
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#34
So you support the drug war, with its attending costs both in money and human lives.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#44
Unless all rapes involve "completely drunk" females your argument is specious (and sexist).
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#50
Ah, so you're arguing from the 'once is too much' for people being raped, but not
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Feb 2015
#51
I think alcohol prohibition was a glaring, first tier example of a ban that DID NOT work.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#41
exactly, they are arguing against all laws now. Because this topic has no context....
bettyellen
Feb 2015
#67
Well maybe you should do some research. Lawrence v. Texas, a fairly important SCOTUS decision.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#91
Yes, I should have gone ahead and made those exceptions plain early on
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Feb 2015
#96
Look, man. I've got alcoholism all over my family tree like a bad set of christmas lights.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#99
If the prohibition is lifted you don't really have much say in the matter.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#62
A meaningless pledge that has no legal enforcement. It's pathetically comical, actually.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#65
Just like the RWers that refuse to treat children, except you are paid in advance.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#68
When someone holds their prejudices higher than the inherent rights of innocent people and then
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#75
You're hiding behind accusations of lying but I'm curious to know how you imagine a paid alleged
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#80
Nobody is making you own a gun just as my using birth control doesn't diminish someone else's
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#82
You have neither the authority nor the ability to enforce your personal prejudices.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#84
Why bother responding to the talk of idiots, just let them keep on talking.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#5
Yep, her solution is to add another level of violence into the scenario. How pathetic, she is.
RKP5637
Feb 2015
#63
I don't think this bill would affect the spaces where the partying goes on: the bill
petronius
Feb 2015
#92
You do know that the police have no legal obligation to protect you, personally, right?
X_Digger
Feb 2015
#37
Most college rape is date or acquaintance rape. In other words it's a guy a woman is already
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#107
Of course you can disagree, but your argument isn't producing the results you want.
procon
Feb 2015
#110
Nope, I'm not. You are passive-aggressively defending the call for moar gunz
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#111
Exactly what I thought. What you wrote is simply an indirect support of guns. Nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#113
WTF! Guns, guns, guns are always the solution. Is that all they can some up with,
RKP5637
Feb 2015
#61
Just another right wing republican trying to force her gundamentalist religion on others.
stone space
Feb 2015
#73