Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)115. They most certainly were not the same, why would anyone say that? n/t
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What hyperbole - and all based on speculation and personal opinion, rather than fact.
BlueCaliDem
Feb 2015
#109
There is an alert button at the bottom of the jury results. That comment deserves it in my opinion.
pkdu
Feb 2015
#103
It was childish of me, but I've remedied the problem by putting mohRokTah on ignore
peacebird
Feb 2015
#22
I can see NO valid reason for anybody who is liberal to NOT vote for the Democratic nominee.
MohRokTah
Feb 2015
#5
I know and understand what happened. Had less than 1 out of every 100 NAder voters voted for Gore...
MohRokTah
Feb 2015
#97
Stop President Walker? You would vote for Hillary to stop a President Walker?
A Simple Game
Feb 2015
#113
You should really take a little time to educate yourself about something so important.
A Simple Game
Feb 2015
#65
So you mock people that want the person they think is best to be the Democratic candidate.
A Simple Game
Feb 2015
#75
When the nominee ISN'T liberal on issues like TPP, H1B visas, and other corporate influence...
cascadiance
Feb 2015
#127
What is stupid is for some not to realize that Ruth Ginsberg will most likely retire
still_one
Feb 2015
#23
Do you have confidence that Clinton will appoint the type of SC justices you want?
tularetom
Feb 2015
#40
You have got to be kidding me. You think that Clinton's appointees will be any different
StevieM
Feb 2015
#85
Bill Clinton did, unless you have a problem with Ginsberg. Do you know what you are talking about?
still_one
Feb 2015
#86
not at all, but their positions on social issues are pretty much the same. Consistency means
still_one
Feb 2015
#111
but at least on DU they don't think that is important enough. They should have a real problem on DU
still_one
Feb 2015
#87
OK, how liberal of a Justice can any Democrat get through the Republican Senate?
Savannahmann
Feb 2015
#114
+1. And I refuse to vote for anyone who was ever a Republican!!!!! Unforgivable!!!!!!
DanTex
Feb 2015
#4
And what is so wonderful about our system is that you don't have to vote for them
Autumn
Feb 2015
#6
You are part right, I did change my voter registration from Democrat to Unaffiliated
Autumn
Feb 2015
#11
Then why are you supporting Hillary over someone that is more in line with Democratic values?
Dawgs
Feb 2015
#124
So if she wins the Democratic nomination you will not vote for her? If that is the case at that
still_one
Feb 2015
#89
In my state I can't vote for them, because they only let me vote once in the primary
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2015
#76
If the Democrat isn't a Turd Way sell out then I have little doubt conservatives will sneak across
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#82