Las Vegas Republican calls for ‘hot little girls’ to be armed to stop campus rapes

[beevul]

108. Did someone say it was?

You made a statement:

"More violence is never a solution."

You listed no qualifiers as to it only pertaining to "hot little girls", and in fact used the word never.

Clearly, that statement is wrong, since we as a society have decided to have police, secret service, and military to engage in violence on our behalf when occasions merit its use.

At issue is state legislation proposed by a Republican politician who wants to allow guns on campus because she thinks "hot little girls" can prevent assaults if only they had a gun.

Along with many others, I also disagreed, whilst you sided with the Republican. I cited several examples to demonstrate the flawed logic in that simplistic raison d'être. If you're still dissatisfied, then may I suggest your issues lay elsewhere and are unlike to be satisfactory resolved here.

Reading comprehension troubles, or memory troubles perhaps?

I took no position on the OP. Read that again, if you need to.

I simply asked one question, which in spite of attributing to me things I have not stated, you failed failed to answer. Someone else stated:

"In what bizarro world does the government renounce mandate to protect the public and opt for violent vigilante street justice at the end of a gun as the only way women can avoid a rapist?"

The question I asked, which was a response to a ridiculous statement, which you seem unable to answer or even address in any way, is this:

In what bizarro world, is defending ones self with a firearm against someone intent on raping you, in any way equivalent to "violent vigilante street justice at the end of a gun"?

Care to take a stab at it, instead of engaging in sophomoric sophistry?