Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yep. There was a time when 'Conservative' didn't mean insanity. onehandle Feb 2015 #1
Yep. It's why I use scarequotes when referencing Repubs and Neocons. riqster Feb 2015 #5
They are Neo-Confederates, not Conservatives by any stretch of the imagination. BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #2
+1 riqster Feb 2015 #8
They only want to 'conserve' their ill gotten gains from Confederate crimes. freshwest Feb 2015 #13
Okay. In that, and that alone, they can be called conservatives. BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #17
Just as the Confederacy's main objection to the USA was Equality. It was counter to their view that freshwest Feb 2015 #24
Yep. They would have us all be slaves. riqster Feb 2015 #25
Point. riqster Feb 2015 #19
Quite true! True conservatives are sane. True conservatives you can discuss and work RKP5637 Feb 2015 #3
Ike was a conservative. riqster Feb 2015 #7
So was Republican President Theodore Roosevelt. He's liberal compared to today's Teapublicans. BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #12
S'truth. riqster Feb 2015 #15
Reactionary would be a more accurate description. Dont call me Shirley Feb 2015 #40
Hey, using the same derogatory names gets old after a while. riqster Feb 2015 #41
Even Ike's conservative opponent in 1952, Robert Taft, would be too "liberal" for today's GOP... First Speaker Feb 2015 #43
And his son the Governor was convicted of crimes in office. riqster Feb 2015 #44
Excellent post! Thanks for saying it. RoBear Feb 2015 #4
Yep. No such thing as a conservative revolutionary. riqster Feb 2015 #6
K&R Scuba Feb 2015 #9
Boink. riqster Feb 2015 #10
The word conservative still seems to apply... Orsino Feb 2015 #11
Hmmm. Interesting take. riqster Feb 2015 #18
Yeah, you'd think that a conservative should be distinct from a feudalist. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #20
I've been feuding with these "conservatives" for decades now... riqster Feb 2015 #21
Rec'd... freebrew Feb 2015 #14
Thanks. riqster Feb 2015 #16
Well, They Did Get Away With It, Right? ProfessorGAC Feb 2015 #22
All true. riqster Feb 2015 #23
Present day GOPers are downright crazy Iliyah Feb 2015 #26
Would that it were so. riqster Feb 2015 #31
Conservatives conserve wealth for the oligarchs. Liberal want to liberally spread wealth around for valerief Feb 2015 #27
I dunno about that. Neocon motherfuckers start by stealing from us. riqster Feb 2015 #30
More like "Reactionaries"? fredamae Feb 2015 #28
A good word. riqster Feb 2015 #29
Reactionaries, in the historical sense, meant a return to the "Ancien Regime" Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2015 #34
Interesting. riqster Feb 2015 #47
Umm... few notes for the author bobclark86 Feb 2015 #32
Notes back atcha: riqster Feb 2015 #33
Try again (or not, I have a life outside of Internet semantics) bobclark86 Feb 2015 #36
Rearranging the parameters is seen by amateurs as a surefire way to win a debate riqster Feb 2015 #38
"Regressives" would also be a good term for them: Jamaal510 Feb 2015 #35
A good word. Methinks I shall steal it. riqster Feb 2015 #37
A novelist weighs in Jim Lane Feb 2015 #39
Nice. riqster Feb 2015 #42
Lafferty wrote mostly science fiction. Jim Lane Feb 2015 #45
Thanks! riqster Feb 2015 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Note to the lurking Right...»Reply #14