Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They should be reducing the Soc Sec age to 50 for retirement. No jobs and G Will wants it at 74. [View all]ieoeja
(9,748 posts)16. But technology has eliminated the need for so many workers.
It no longer requires as many people working as long to produce everything everyone wants.
We should be retiring earlier. Or working fewer hours. For instance, labor unions suggested a 6 hour day thus adding a 4th shift to around-the-clock shops during the Great Depression.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They should be reducing the Soc Sec age to 50 for retirement. No jobs and G Will wants it at 74. [View all]
CK_John
Apr 2012
OP
National money is just a concept. Just an accounting game that means nothing as long
CK_John
Apr 2012
#9
Great age to try those things we have been dreaming about since 30. Take a sabbatical
CK_John
Apr 2012
#39
Remove the FICA taxation limit on incomes and give full benefits for retirement at 62.
roamer65
Apr 2012
#40