General Discussion

LiberalLovinLug

(14,714 posts)

205. +1000

Wed Feb 25, 2015, 02:03 PM

Feb 2015

"All it says is that his work is unassailable, so let's go after him personally."

Well retorted. I too am getting sick of these posters scraping and clawing for any personal quibble they can find to deflect the conversation away from his work or the implications of Snowden's revelations.

They use three methods easy to see:

1. Red Herring...Like this time, But but but but he lives in Brazil! (Snowden lives in Russia fer gawds sake!) We can't possibly take serious anything that is said from outside our borders!

2. Straw Man...Start the argument off by predefining the characters...Greenwald is a pretentious asshole, he just wants fame and fortune, or he is a stone cold Rand Libertarian. I guess they do this to justify their following diatribe which is then colored with some form of: "why would you ever listen to someone like this? Obviously everything someone with this kind of character is not to be trusted"

3. Personality flaws...Anything they can find to paint him as not a perfect human being. Or anything different, like where he lives, his sexual preferences, gawd forbid his is ever snappy to a reporters questions!

The same can be applied to their tired predictable reactions to Snowden, Manning and Assange.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

301 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Glenn Greenwald blasts Hillary Clinton: �The ultimate guardian of bipartisan status quo corruption� [View all] RiverLover Feb 2015 OP

Greenwald. LOL...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #1

LOL RiverLover Feb 2015 #9

He's going to be speaking at a memorial lecture for a pro-lyncher msanthrope Feb 2015 #11

I see neither you nor Sid can argue that he's wrong about this. Scuba Feb 2015 #13

I don't have to argue on behalf of HRC--she speaks for herself. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #33

Yes she does. raindaddy Feb 2015 #37

And Glenn was a Wall Street attorney--his firm worked for Sachs--for money. Pot, meet kettle....nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #38

So... you're saying corruption knows its own stink. Veilex Feb 2015 #53

I'm saying that Mr. Greenwald is the last person who should complain about GOldman Sachs. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #58

"Mr. Greenwald is the last person who should complain about GOldman Sachs" Veilex Feb 2015 #71

He was a "Wall Street attorney" for 18 months, right after he graduated from law school in 1994. deurbano Feb 2015 #189

Framing at its best. Veilex Feb 2015 #216

You would think after all this time they could come up with SOMETHING to smear him with. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #227

*Nod* Veilex Feb 2015 #231

What was funny in one of the emails where HB Gary named Greenwald as someone to include in the smear sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #232

I love watching people shred bullies. Veilex Feb 2015 #236

Lol, I used to go to his blog just to watch him in action with right wing trolls. He could have sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #238

Greenwald smears anti-war protesters in defense of Irag war kfreed Oct 2015 #296

You're attributing something raindaddy said here to Greenwald . . . markpkessinger Feb 2015 #124

Still attacking the source I see. Scuba Feb 2015 #74

Well, that's what happens when you have nothing else and are desperate... BeanMusical Feb 2015 #79

msanthrope has less-than-nothing nikto Feb 2015 #162

Lol! +1 BeanMusical Feb 2015 #166

And I won't be voting for Greenwald for President! raindaddy Feb 2015 #78

Pot calling kettle black does not mean kettle is not black. thesquanderer Feb 2015 #151

And Hillary was a Goldwater Girl. Fawke Em Feb 2015 #207

As a teenager...but Glenn was an adult. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #210

And Elizabeth Warren was once a Republican Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #275

True, but then she's not a white supremacist tea bagger either, so there's that:) kfreed Oct 2015 #298

LOL pocoloco Feb 2015 #45

I have heard enough from HRC to make a decision. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #194

Libertarian Glenn Greenwald wants NSA privatization kfreed Oct 2015 #295

Still no argument that he's wrong, just that Democrats shouldn't like him. Scuba Oct 2015 #299

I see you have nothing to say, again, about the subject matter of the OP. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #24

And I see you have nothing to say about Greenwald working for Allen West. I understand that. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #35

I see you're still trying the 'let me use the title box to smear Greenwald' tactic, sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #39

I'm pithy, Sabrina. You should try it. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #40

So is Bill O'Reilly, no thanks! Lol! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #44

"I prefer 'substance' to 'pithiness'." Veilex Feb 2015 #56

"stood up for something"? What's he doing living in Brazil? George II Feb 2015 #59

"What's he doing living in Brazil?" At a guess, I'd say... Veilex Feb 2015 #75

Did you really ask that question on DU, AGAIN? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #87

We have the answer that HE gives, which was rendered moot years ago, and..... George II Feb 2015 #91

It was never rendered 'moot'. This question has been answered every time it has been used to sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #97

I just added more to my post - his reason for not living here, HIS reason, was DOMA. George II Feb 2015 #101

I know what his reason is. And it has not changed. Again, what does that have to do with his WORK? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #108

... Veilex Feb 2015 #217

Not JUST DOMA...but thats certainly part of it... Veilex Feb 2015 #218

Thank you, sabrina 1 Thespian2 Feb 2015 #172

You're welcome, Thespian2 and thank you for doing so also. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #178

Some of us will fight anyway Thespian2 Feb 2015 #180

+1000 LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #205

They should give up. Clearly his record is so clean Bank of America who had a contract out for bid sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #228

Bill O'Reilly is not 'pithy.' Sabrina. He's terse. There's a difference. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #65

Oh, my! Look at you correcting someone's usage. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #69

'pithy' immediately brought O'Reilly to mind, because you know, he's 'terse' he claims, unlike sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #94

I didn't get bent out of shape---I'm laughing at you following me from thread to thread, trying to msanthrope Feb 2015 #140

That's Bill O'Reilly's favorite word, 'pithy', describing how 'terse' he is as compared to Liberals sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #89

She's making a list: OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #152

Thanks for reminding me. I am so incredibly flattered by those, several of whom I do not even know, sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #177

Wow. OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #184

Thank you! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #187

... Number23 Feb 2015 #223

I remember that howler. OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #224

You listen to Sean Hannity? Wow! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #233

Nope. OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #259

Thank you, that was another example of someone here who obviously listens to these old Right Wing sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #260

... OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #262

Again, only Faux/Hannity viewers focus on PEOPLE, specifically Liberal Dems while Dems focus on sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #263

Notice how the less she has to say, the longer the posts get??? Number23 Feb 2015 #266

That was a great thread! Completely forgot about it. Thanks to all my fans for keeping these files. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #226

Sabrina, everyone knows that your posts grow longer, somehow more incoherent and your use of the Number23 Feb 2015 #242

Everyone? You speak for ALL DUers here? Omg, that's funny. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #245

If you reply to me first, dear, then I am not the one stalking you. Number23 Feb 2015 #265

Okay, I'll accept that. But I was certain that there were a few who did not agree with sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #267

It took you two days to come up with this idiocy? Number23 Mar 2015 #270

I think we need a poll to decide this once and for all. It seems to be so important to you. sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #271

So when told to "put up or shut up" you respond with these eight lines of nothing Number23 Mar 2015 #276

I'm sure you don't mean to, but you keep paying me compliments. Of course I don't fool anyone, sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #278

I will now give you my standard response I've reserved for only you and three others in all of my Number23 Mar 2015 #280

I told you I do not take orders from you. You were never on ignore, you WERE ignored, until you sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #282

I still don't understand how his supporters here on DU would defend this Libertarian BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #107

Was he talking about a democrat? I thought it was about Hillary Clinton. Bugenhagen Feb 2015 #156

Greenwald prefers Feingold. So do I and think he should run among several other Democrats. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #208

Where did Greenwald say he prefers Feingold? Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #252

I'd love to see that link, too. nt MADem Mar 2015 #284

DU is infested with Libertarians kfreed Oct 2015 #297

Yep. They should change the name of this site now that's clear. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #300

What is your point? nikto Feb 2015 #161

+1000 n/t sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #234

Can you imagine the outcry if Clinton did that? joshcryer Feb 2015 #192

so he's correct isn't he!? n/t wildbilln864 Feb 2015 #19

Yes! Greenwald! 99Forever Feb 2015 #22

SidDithers. LOL...nt DesMoinesDem Feb 2015 #23

Lol! n/t sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #25

B'WHAHAA! MrMickeysMom Feb 2015 #67

... Enthusiast Feb 2015 #195

I can still remember when Greenwald had credibility uhnope Feb 2015 #169

LOL L0oniX Feb 2015 #175

Thanks Sid, you said Progressive dog Feb 2015 #197

Haters gonna hate;) grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #203

He'll be in TX to pick up his Koch stipend, soon...he knows what side his bread is buttered on, and MADem Feb 2015 #254

Does he get any donations from Goldman Sachs by any chance? Speaking of bread and butter and all sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #272

A stipend is not a donation--that Koch money is payment made for value received. nt MADem Mar 2015 #283

It certainly won't help him to get elected so frankly I don't care. I do care however about who sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #285

Well, he's not running, so what's your point? MADem Mar 2015 #287

That IS my point. He is not a politician so cannot influence policies, unlike those who sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #288

He's speaking to a bunch of wingnuts at yet another Koch - funded think tank. MADem Mar 2015 #289

Yep Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #274

Greenwald... Autumn Feb 2015 #2

"Bipartisan status quo corruption." Nice phrase. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2015 #3

I would have thought that description would also be apt for Jebbie... truebrit71 Feb 2015 #4

Yep. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #6

That was my first thought. He's not wrong. nt laundry_queen Feb 2015 #167

I agree, based on luck of the stopped-clock. tridim Feb 2015 #5

Glenn evidently thinks Rand Paul is going to run as a Democrat Fumesucker Feb 2015 #7

He's more into Russ Feingold RiverLover Feb 2015 #10

I spose Feingold is going under the DU bus next. nt grasswire Feb 2015 #17

Greenwald was always a supporter of Feingold, one of our best Senators throughout sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #26

I agreed with 99% of Russ Feingold's policy positions. 2banon Feb 2015 #201

What an apt moniker you have. :-} n/t DeSwiss Feb 2015 #70

Greenwald would prefer Russ Feingold airc. So would I or Sherrod Brown, Bernie, Kucinich, Warren ... sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #222

Well untill we can come up with a more viable candidate. pennylane100 Feb 2015 #8

I disagree�I think Clinton is a very sad last resort... CoffeeCat Feb 2015 #12

+1,000 "If she's our nominee, I will be politically homeless." Scuba Feb 2015 #15

Not to mention actually homeless with all the jobs that will TBF Feb 2015 #121

I so agree. RiverLover Feb 2015 #16

well said! and thanks for saying it! wildbilln864 Feb 2015 #20

Very well said, CoffeeCat ... sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #27

I actually agree with most of this, but a last resort nonetheless, right? randys1 Feb 2015 #28

Then turnout will probably head towards midterm election levels and... kristopher Feb 2015 #54

Boy you better hope not, a Woman of child bearing years life wont be worth a plug nickel randys1 Feb 2015 #109

That has never came close to occurring in the post war period but one can dream DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #112

Agreed. Clinton vs. Bush will be lowest voter turnout ever, I suspect Dems to Win Feb 2015 #114

Support for her is FAR from lukewarm. In fact, it's incredibly strong. NYC Liberal Feb 2015 #55

Wendy Davis got strong enthusiasm from the same people, came no where near winning. n/t betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #86

She hasn't beat the right-wing assholes yet. CanadaexPat Feb 2015 #155

Oh that's right Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #277

Absolutely... MrMickeysMom Feb 2015 #73

"But do you want Jeb to win?" is a pretty pathetic response" BeanMusical Feb 2015 #96

Yeah, I've come around this, also. I will not vote for her. closeupready Feb 2015 #134

Same here. Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #159

Same with me. 840high Feb 2015 #174

IMHO Hillary is Jeb's best chance to win. zeemike Feb 2015 #173

Bernie Sanders said he has not decided whether he would run as an Independent or a Dem red dog 1 Feb 2015 #68

that's kinda odd cuz mopinko Feb 2015 #165

Has the Dem Leadership asked him to run? They should have by now. I don't think he sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #235

Quote: If Bernie Sanders plans to takes shots at Hillary Clinton, he�s saving his ammo. MADem Mar 2015 #286

"Greenwald endorses Hillary 101 percent: leftbaggers fall for REPUBLICAN LIES by demanding that Dems MisterP Feb 2015 #14

Glen Who? Oh... the guy who doesn't like Hispanic people... and supports a traitor... uponit7771 Feb 2015 #18

I did not know that he dislikes Hispanic people. pennylane100 Feb 2015 #66

Lol, neither did anyone else. The things you 'learn' on DU these days! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #221

What is wrong with these people. pennylane100 Feb 2015 #243

You're not the only who has noticed that. 'a wingnut hangout'! I agree. They are either emulating sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #244

He doesn't like Latinos? DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #120

I guess that's why he lives in Latin America and why he chose a Latino as his life long partner?? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #220

Clarence Thomas?! stop... jus... stop uponit7771 Feb 2015 #225

Clinton LOL Capt. Obvious Feb 2015 #21

K and R bigwillq Feb 2015 #29

Blah, blah, blah...ya gots no cred Mr. Greenwad. SoapBox Feb 2015 #30

Do you disagree with something he said? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #34

So much attacking the messenger JonLP24 Feb 2015 #168

Yes, the 'he hates Latinos' one was especially interesting. Considering sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #181

Recently seeing Snowden cry because of concerns with his sick girlfriend JonLP24 Feb 2015 #185

No one is human to them, they are either 'assets' or 'enemies'. They have lost all their humanity sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #186

Hillary is a fine example of the ultimate "Not as Bad" 3rd Way politician. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #31

Great quote. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #48

Please spend some time describing Rand Paul for us, Mr G. blm Feb 2015 #32

Not a chance he ever touches the Pauls. Not a chance. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #36

Glenn Greenwald: Rand Paul is a panderer and a fraud RiverLover Feb 2015 #42

LOL - It took him till Jan2015 to quit loving Rand so much? blm Feb 2015 #63

Asked and answered. I see your goalposts are slipping. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #76

Not at all. In fact, they're dug in pretty deep. blm Feb 2015 #150

Yes they are dug deep LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #211

So you wish to stubbornly insist, anyway, eh? blm Feb 2015 #214

You may not be consciously mimicking the MSM LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #219

I say GG took a real long time to see Paul for EXACTLY who he is. blm Mar 2015 #291

You are so stuck in your black and white world LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #292

Well - YOU trust him implicitly - good for you. blm Mar 2015 #293

Move on? where? LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #294

lol, just admit you're shit was called. Marr Feb 2015 #230

So, you were wrong, which is okay, we all are sometimes. Where did you get the impression sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #273

Where did I get the impression he supported Rand Paul? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #279

Supported him, or supported something he said at the time? There's a difference . I eg, cannot sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #281

Exactly - GG's supported Paul and now his fan base wants to pretend blm Mar 2015 #290

Lol, these attempts at smears of journalists AND of other DUers are not going so well lately. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #251

Rand Paul is more his type Renew Deal Feb 2015 #41

Please see post 42. BeanMusical Feb 2015 #98

Now's that just asking for a flame war! YoungDemCA Feb 2015 #43

For someone who hates Washington and Democratic pols Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #46

I think you mean "Brazil". nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #47

No, I think she means Brasil OKNancy Feb 2015 #52

In Portuguese it is spelled "Brasil" Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #62

Were you speaking Portuguese? nt truebluegreen Feb 2015 #104

I like using native names for countries when I can Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #106

Glenn Greenwald is an American citizen--always has been. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #83

I thought he was a dual-citizen whose primary year-round residence is in Rio Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #84

Permanent visa. deurbano Feb 2015 #171

He needs to apply for citizenship and vote there Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #193

I was simply letting you know his actual citizenship status... just as I previously let you know deurbano Feb 2015 #213

Sorry...As you can see, Greenwald brings out the worst in me Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #215

Let's get a little truthiness in this thread. Just because someone writes it, doesn't make it true. OKNancy Feb 2015 #49

So let's nominate someone who didn't vote for bad laws because she was scared. Dems to Win Feb 2015 #128

Nice post Nancy. But this thread is for those that think that Greenwald's opinion of Hillary matters Number23 Feb 2015 #129

For people who care about the NSA more than health care, economic geek tragedy Feb 2015 #50

How about for people who care about the NSA elias49 Feb 2015 #64

She's still far superior to anyone on the R side. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #77

I will focus on electing progressives to Congress betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #95

So you are actively hoping a Republican beats her in 2016? geek tragedy Feb 2015 #99

I didn't vote for Coakley either. betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #125

So you helped elect Scott Brown in 2010. Purity troll lacks purity of heart nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #127

I helped Liz Warren betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #130

Ya sure you did. nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #137

I wouldn't even waste time arguing with those that won't vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. still_one Feb 2015 #147

After blasting Hillary, he should blast smearmongers who launch attacks against him RufusTFirefly Feb 2015 #51

Insider = agents of the oligarchs. Outsider = everyone else. nt valerief Feb 2015 #57

Hillary Roddam Clinton, Queen of the Blue Dogs, and would-be Triangulator-in-Chief. blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #60

K&R. Brilliant analysis. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #61

He is allowed his opinion but I am still voting for Hillary if she runs. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #72

In all seriousness -- Maybe Greenwald needs to Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #80

Jeb vs Hillary.. of course I am voting Hillary! TerrapinFlyer Feb 2015 #81

Or they only oppose the Bush Dynasty and pretend that the Clintons are not betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #88

So says Greenwald, the Putin lover. pnwmom Feb 2015 #82

Hmm how come that sounds like you are either with us or with the terrorists? betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #90

Greenwald is a libertarian. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #92

Assad's opposition were mostly Isis. betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #93

Two lies combined with an unfounded insinuation that someone voted for Bush because geek tragedy Feb 2015 #100

Pointing out that Obama hired on neocons in the state department and they wanted to punish Putin is betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #113

How is wanting Paul to defeat Clinton in 2016 reasonable? nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #115

I don't want Paul to defeat Clinton betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #118

Mmmm hmmmm, geek tragedy Feb 2015 #119

How come it is ok to support W in the past but not suppose it is because you are a neocon? betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #122

When people spend most of their time talking about how we'd be better geek tragedy Feb 2015 #123

When people use Bush rhetoric to support neocon views they open themselves up to obvious commentary betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #132

Bush campaigned on behalf of Hillary Clinton? nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #133

Clinton and Obama supported Lieberman over Lamont betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #135

Yes, unlike you, Clinton and Obama supported the Democratic nominee nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #136

Lamont was the dem nominee betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #138

They supported the incumbent LIEberman during the primary, but Lamont in the general election nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #139

Hillary gave a tepid endorsement as did Obama. Bill betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #145

How come suddenly it's not okay to applaud people who realize they were wrong and then go on sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #209

Please stop with the personal insults. No, I didn't support any Republican, ever. pnwmom Feb 2015 #105

That one thinks people who don't prefer Putin and Rand Paul geek tragedy Feb 2015 #110

Greenwald has spoken for himself on his political affiliation. Btw, Drake is a Republican. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #102

A Libertarian is one who won't admit in public they really vote Republican! TerrapinFlyer Feb 2015 #142

He is a civil Libertarian which means he agrees with Libertarians on some issues betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #146

And he prefers Putin to Clinton. Enough said. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #148

"You're either with us or with the terrorists!" George W Bush. n/t betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #153

+1 Phlem Feb 2015 #163

He preferred Saddam to America too. And all the rest of us here on DU. Was that meant as sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #237

+1, for the post title itself uponit7771 Feb 2015 #212

Oh Glenn, you are such a Clinton Hater davidpdx Feb 2015 #85

And he likes Pol Pot or something. BeanMusical Feb 2015 #103

LOL, he'll be pining for Barack Obama by the time 2017 rolls around nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #111

He'll be pining for the fjords. Major Hogwash Feb 2015 #190

Why am I not surprised? treestar Feb 2015 #116

Troof AzDar Feb 2015 #117

bump for all the GGDS sufferers with nothing but a "LOL" defense stupidicus Feb 2015 #126

"Dem efforts to hand Hillary the nomination without contest." (?) BeyondGeography Feb 2015 #131

Wait.. you mean the people who want to vote for her actually count? TerrapinFlyer Feb 2015 #141

K&R ReRe Feb 2015 #143

There's a lot of guardians on this board too whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #144

Anyone that disagrees with the title can't seriously believe it isn't true JonLP24 Feb 2015 #149

Progressives pay a high price for allowing the Democratic blogs to dominate their discourse. n/t betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #154

Handing her the nomination without contest libodem Feb 2015 #157

HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Feb 2015 #158

Hillary is basically a Reagan-Republican except for her support of abortion rights and Gay Marriage nikto Feb 2015 #160

Greenwald Nails It Yet Again cantbeserious Feb 2015 #164

Hillary Clinton, salt of the Earth, fighting for working families, taking on Wall Street corruption whereisjustice Feb 2015 #170

K & R ...for pissing off all the right people. L0oniX Feb 2015 #176

You better believe it! Bobbie Jo Feb 2015 #179

Lol, that's for sure! Two Academy Awards, one Director's Guild Award for the Documentary detailing sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #182

Papa Paul Whore Blast Hillary,,,,,, Cryptoad Feb 2015 #183

Dude, she is not the "ultimate" anything. This is like the GOP calling Kerry the "most liberal" McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #188

You got that right. Greenwald's hyperbole truly knows no limits. randome Feb 2015 #239

An example of both parties agreeing is America = Capitalism. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #191

K&R! This post deserves hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Feb 2015 #196

Of course I am voting Hillary. stonecutter357 Feb 2015 #198

K & R GoneFishin Feb 2015 #199

Insiders vs Outsiders - Stating the Obvious, but it's apparently required to be repeated 2banon Feb 2015 #200

Greenwald is right about Madmiddle Feb 2015 #202

Hillary's the Future, we need team work with all Democrats!!! Attack GOP, not democrats!!! lewebley3 Feb 2015 #204

Hillary's the Past & we ARE attacking GOP!!! RiverLover Feb 2015 #206

This really irritated the usual apologists for bipartisan status quo corruption. Marr Feb 2015 #229

It would be different if Greenwald actually gave a shit about Dems Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #246

Greenwald: "Rand Paul is a panderer and a fraud." Marr Feb 2015 #249

Yeah, he had a pissy-fit falling out after the Israel thing Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #250

Can you cite one of his promotions of a Paul candidacy? /nt Marr Feb 2015 #253

He hasn't come straight out and said "Paul 2016!!!!", but... Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #255

"Greenwald's butt buddy"? Seriously? Marr Feb 2015 #257

I criticize the party constantly Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #264

Who do we think Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders will vote for? randome Feb 2015 #240

is appeal to authority the best you have? TheSarcastinator Feb 2015 #241

I'm not 'appealing to authority'. randome Feb 2015 #258

OMG WHAT WILL THE SWOONERS SAY Skittles Feb 2015 #247

Let me try to reel this back in the boat: Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #248

Just wondering: Did everybody forget this? Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #256

He loves to use the word 'fuck', doesn't he? Makes you wonder what kind of neuroses drive him. randome Feb 2015 #261

kick woo me with science Mar 2015 #268

I agree. LWolf Mar 2015 #269

ah, you have to pull this old piece out of the toilet. Sad case for you. riversedge Oct 2015 #301