Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Y'all know that Pres. Obama didn't just end the Keystone XL, yes? [View all]MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)142. And therein lies the problem
You: "You suck!"
Me: "That seems a bit hostile."
You: "It's not hostile, because you really do suck! It's just the truth! Now why won't you tell me why you suck?"
So I'm thinking that further discussion won't really be helpful, sorry.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Y'all know that Pres. Obama didn't just end the Keystone XL, yes? [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Feb 2015
OP
Suppose he wanted to approve Keystone, why wouldn't he just cut a deal with Republicans
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#18
The former, since I'm not going to question good faith on anyone's part. nt
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#31
So Obama wanted to sign it, and they put it on his desk, and he vetoed it ...
JoePhilly
Feb 2015
#30
Now, to complete my reply....look, Manny, let me first refer to the sexism issue...
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2015
#144
Straw Manny! And the placement of that "leg" makes for a very impressive appendage!
Number23
Feb 2015
#43
Protecting the traditional jurisdiction of the Department of State over international business projects is important.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#4
"your little hate panties are showing. Tuck 'em back in, cause it's kind of embarrassing."
Number23
Feb 2015
#28
And applauded by all the same posters who whine about the lack of civility and being called names
BrotherIvan
Feb 2015
#72
While sanctimoniously crying like stuck pigs about name calling and divisiveness.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#121
I hid it for the personal attack. I will ALWAYS hide for a personal attack.
ScreamingMeemie
Feb 2015
#101
Whatever issues Obama has or doesn't have with the pipeline are not the point of the veto.
truebluegreen
Feb 2015
#34
You really think his opinions on the underlying merit were completely irrelevant to how
geek tragedy
Feb 2015
#40
I honestly think vetoing Keystone might happen - because it is not such a moneymaker now,
djean111
Feb 2015
#14
Hopefully these folks have had their heads raised and the meaning of the veto has hit them square.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#61
wow . . .can't believe how many here do not understand the veto even when explained to them
DrDan
Feb 2015
#59
Sometimes it is like the Fox Bubble has invaded DU. But a lot of the blame is on the stupid and lazy media.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#67
oh, hey...here...so see, I'm not unaware...I re-read you and entire thread.
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2015
#143
If the concept is too complicated for a headline or sound bite, we're doomed.
RufusTFirefly
Feb 2015
#110
I can't find anything mistaken in your post. I do suspect, however, that Obama will not allow
Vattel
Feb 2015
#116
Won't end for years - as others have noted, Keystone isn't a pipeline, it's a GOP fetish object
hatrack
Feb 2015
#118
Well, I have to admit I still want to believe sometimes good things might be afoot
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#120
I can picture you getting dry heaves whenever President Obama does something good.
great white snark
Feb 2015
#145