Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Writing is hard, writing what you mean without any possibility of misinterpretation is even harder [View all]cbayer
(146,218 posts)111. Well done. I think this resonates with lots of us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Writing is hard, writing what you mean without any possibility of misinterpretation is even harder [View all]
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
OP
Yeah, I think it was you in that thread about the VLT and mirrors rather than lenses..
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#54
My post was about the homeless person being castigated for the sign actually
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#16
Oh, she got a few but overall I wasn't surprised at the way the thread went..
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#23
100% agree. It seems more and more there's a presumption of bad faith around here
el_bryanto
Feb 2015
#15
I am not sure why you would deny someone the pleasure of misinterpreting a post.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#92
Why are you bashing Hillary Clinton? Look in a mirror bub because mimes are a silent threat.
Vattel
Feb 2015
#70
I'm sick of corporate shills like you always pushing your pseudoscience into our classrooms.
Glassunion
Feb 2015
#73
Obviously you're a gun-humping, Putin-loving, Obama-worshipping, third way Snowden fanboy!
Vattel
Feb 2015
#82
I really strongly agree with this OP, which is by the way worded beautifully.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2015
#27
Young broke homeless person expresses themself inelegantly, what a surprise!
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#31
Good, then we've identified disclaimer 4 and 5 as the relevant disclaimers to
prayin4rain
Feb 2015
#41
I don't see it as irrelevant to the issue of being quick to judge others by a few words
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#71
Indeed, I see your point also which is why I mentioned pain on both sides of the sign
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#93
The most absolutely pure case of troll fail I've ever seen and I've seen a lot...
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#45
It is good to ask for clarification and to take time to make sure you understand
uppityperson
Feb 2015
#36
It's when we get indignant that we are most likely to say something unfortunate..
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#61
We could all be holding hastily scribbled messages on scraps of cardboard...
countryjake
Feb 2015
#47
"I have made this longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter."
Maedhros
Feb 2015
#51
After thinking about it a while I've come to the conclusion there was pain on both sides of the sign
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#76
example "The Democratic party *should* marginalize and ignore liberals" right?
Vincardog
Feb 2015
#63
An absurdly uncharitable and unreasonable interpretation of said word choice at that.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#121
Knowing what it's supposed to say might make it even more difficult to catch the error
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#79
I find that the best copy editors are people unskilled in the subject matter
MannyGoldstein
Feb 2015
#81
You know what? She deleted that thread after thinking about it. That puts her head and shoulders
Rex
Feb 2015
#97
I'm about to find out because I'm currently writing a book on the demand side of economics.
mmonk
Feb 2015
#116
Amen. And to hell with the faux outraged---those who hate the message so they nitpick some
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#127
Honestly I think there was pain on both sides of that sign, the reader and the writer
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#132