Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A (sad) tale of two polls. Actually, of one poll. [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(101,850 posts)40. Polls are snapshots. You will get no debate from me./NT
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thats what I keep trying to point out to the Left Leaning Independents on this board!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#76
No, I have a pretty low opinion of Public Policy Polling and people who put stock in their polls.
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#9
Why don't you believe it to be the case? And what variables haven't they controlled for?
DanTex
Feb 2015
#25
Lets also remember how early it is, and how "meaningful" these things were in early 2007. (nt)
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#39
The results aren't crap. As long as you have results beyond the 5.6% margin of error
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#15
You're right, the number could be as low as 73.4% approval from Dems. Or as high as 84.6%.
DanTex
Feb 2015
#16
"PPP didn't poll DU or the outcome would have been significantly different! "
SidDithers
Feb 2015
#8
Or if one were to believe in fairytales...one might believe that DU is just like the rest of the
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#82
DU as children or childish, never! I mean that some democrats are gullible like children.
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#88
It's simultaneously sad and comical how many recommendations the specious thread got./NT
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2015
#3
Am I correct in reading that "Base" is the raw data from those who answered the poll?
Agnosticsherbet
Feb 2015
#4
Its all they have....they are so desperate...they now are using the exact same tactics
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#84
Why would 20 people rec a thread that, deliberately or accidentally, misrepresents polling data?...
SidDithers
Feb 2015
#14
Okay at some point you need to decide if you feel the sample size is representative...
Agschmid
Feb 2015
#98
Well, I am not a hater, but if one polling company can come up with such diverse results,
MADem
Feb 2015
#36
My point is that NONE of them are "reputable" at this stage of the game. It's all bullshit and talk.
MADem
Feb 2015
#63
OK, so no polls showing Bernie Sanders ahead. As I thought. One check in my column.
DanTex
Feb 2015
#64
its not many or most Duers....its just a vocal minority of Left Leaning Independents...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#87
What Democrats on DU? You've told the majority of us we aren't Democrats, remember?
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2015
#119
the POINT is....that misrepresenting the facts in order to substantiate a narrative...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#86
Well, regardless of whether or not the person started that other thread on the basis of a
MADem
Feb 2015
#138
Actually, what I am is a person who is mightily sick of the bullshit tearing down I am seeing on DU.
MADem
Feb 2015
#43
The percentages aren't meaningless unless you read them incorrectly. On purpose.
DanTex
Feb 2015
#53
Where does the poster mention the party base? All I see on that document is 'base'.
Rex
Feb 2015
#65
Obama was guar-ON-TEEEEEEED to lose BIG to RMoney--Guar-ON-TEEEEEEED, I tellya!!!!!
MADem
Feb 2015
#130
If you start with a false premise, the blanks are filled in after one does the math.
MADem
Feb 2015
#135
Based on the two crosstabs posted Hillary is seen unfavorably by more "VOTERS"
Cosmic Kitten
Feb 2015
#111