Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Liberals and Conservatives Both Resist Science, But Differently [View all]
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/liberals-and-conservatives-both-resist-science-but-differently/#more-7638There have been a number of studies looking at how ideological belief influence attitudes toward science. It is no surprise that in general people, of whatever ideological bent, engage in motivated reasoning to deny science that appears to contradict their religious or political beliefs. There are different views, however, regarding whether or not the two main political ideologies in the US, liberal and conservative, are equal or substantially different in their resistance to science.
A series of articles in a special section of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science explore this question. In a commentary summarizing the findings, Kraft et al write:
The studies presented in the preceding section of the volume consistently find evidence for hyperskepticism toward scientific evidence among ideologues, no matter the domain or contextand this skepticism seems to be stronger among conservatives than liberals. Here, we show that these patterns can be understood as part of a general tendency among individuals to defend their prior attitudes and actively challenge attitudinally incongruent arguments, a tendency that appears to be evident among liberals and conservatives alike.
As is often the case when there are two schools of thought, both are partly right. In this case it appears that the tendency to defend ones position, resist incongruent evidence, and engage in motivated reasoning is a universal trait among humans. However, the research does consistently show that the magnitude of this effect is greater for conservatives than liberals. No one doubts that this asymmetry is consistently seen in research, but there remains a difference in interpretation.
..."
Basically, the evidence is that we should always question ourselves more than others, or at least before we question others. Or that's my take on it.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am bookmarking to read later, but I suspect there is false equivalency here.
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#5
"....this skepticism seems to be stronger among conservatives than liberals."
Sheepshank
Feb 2015
#11
You were the one who brought up questioning oneself and when I ask you about it you attack me.
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#31
Who funded the science used in each area of this study? The article says libs rejected science on
peacebird
Feb 2015
#30
Good science and general faith in it results from discussions. Real discussions.
GreatGazoo
Feb 2015
#35