Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 03:05 PM Feb 2015

Liberals and Conservatives Both Resist Science, But Differently [View all]

http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/liberals-and-conservatives-both-resist-science-but-differently/#more-7638

There have been a number of studies looking at how ideological belief influence attitudes toward science. It is no surprise that in general people, of whatever ideological bent, engage in motivated reasoning to deny science that appears to contradict their religious or political beliefs. There are different views, however, regarding whether or not the two main political ideologies in the US, liberal and conservative, are equal or substantially different in their resistance to science.

A series of articles in a special section of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science explore this question. In a commentary summarizing the findings, Kraft et al write:

The studies presented in the preceding section of the volume consistently find evidence for hyperskepticism toward scientific evidence among ideologues, no matter the domain or context—and this skepticism seems to be stronger among conservatives than liberals. Here, we show that these patterns can be understood as part of a general tendency among individuals to defend their prior attitudes and actively challenge attitudinally incongruent arguments, a tendency that appears to be evident among liberals and conservatives alike.


As is often the case when there are two schools of thought, both are partly right. In this case it appears that the tendency to defend one’s position, resist incongruent evidence, and engage in motivated reasoning is a universal trait among humans. However, the research does consistently show that the magnitude of this effect is greater for conservatives than liberals. No one doubts that this asymmetry is consistently seen in research, but there remains a difference in interpretation.

..."




Basically, the evidence is that we should always question ourselves more than others, or at least before we question others. Or that's my take on it.


44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It scares me that there has been no feedback on this one. HuckleB Feb 2015 #1
I think the factor is how ideologically driven someone is - el_bryanto Feb 2015 #2
I used to agree about leftists and science, but not so much any more. HuckleB Feb 2015 #4
I do think this is a human tendency in general. However-- Marr Feb 2015 #3
In my experience, anti-science reasoning uses different languages. HuckleB Feb 2015 #6
I think there's an enormous difference in how often you find it on the two sides. Marr Feb 2015 #8
Data matters. HuckleB Feb 2015 #9
It sounds to me like you want to say something without actually saying it. Marr Feb 2015 #10
Did you read the OP at all? HuckleB Feb 2015 #12
Why are you being so combative? Marr Feb 2015 #37
You could use a mirror. HuckleB Feb 2015 #39
You want data edhopper Feb 2015 #25
So you want to cherry pick your data. HuckleB Feb 2015 #27
You have only presented this one article edhopper Feb 2015 #29
So you never bothered to read the full article with it's links. HuckleB Feb 2015 #33
A large majority of liberals deny the science behind GMOs. former9thward Feb 2015 #42
That may be true. Marr Feb 2015 #44
I am bookmarking to read later, but I suspect there is false equivalency here. stevenleser Feb 2015 #5
It's good to challenge one's suspicions. HuckleB Feb 2015 #7
"....this skepticism seems to be stronger among conservatives than liberals." Sheepshank Feb 2015 #11
And how is it that a be all, end all for you? HuckleB Feb 2015 #13
My quote comes from your own OP Sheepshank Feb 2015 #14
So, you think cherry picking words is legitimate? HuckleB Feb 2015 #15
isn't that exactly what your are doing? Sheepshank Feb 2015 #17
So, challenging yourself is really hard for you to do. HuckleB Feb 2015 #19
so pony up and tell me the purpose of your continued diatribe Sheepshank Feb 2015 #23
The OP spells it out quite clearly. HuckleB Feb 2015 #24
I agree edhopper Feb 2015 #18
Well, the author of the piece is very liberal and science minded. HuckleB Feb 2015 #20
Wait edhopper Feb 2015 #22
You seem to be trying to not make sense. HuckleB Feb 2015 #26
I read it edhopper Feb 2015 #28
Does this mean you question yourself more than others? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #16
I haven't noted that tendency with you, at all. HuckleB Feb 2015 #21
You were the one who brought up questioning oneself and when I ask you about it you attack me. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #31
Oh brother. HuckleB Feb 2015 #40
Which of us is having more influence here? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #43
Who funded the science used in each area of this study? The article says libs rejected science on peacebird Feb 2015 #30
Liberal skepticism isn't irrational. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #32
That is a bias right there. MicaelS Feb 2015 #34
Is experience derived from decades of observation irrational? YMMV lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #38
Exactly. HuckleB Feb 2015 #41
Good science and general faith in it results from discussions. Real discussions. GreatGazoo Feb 2015 #35
I'll always be a raw scientist first. hunter Feb 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Liberals and Conservative...