Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kablooie

(19,108 posts)
11. "This means an inevitable return to the courts for net neutrality rules" - Fred Upton, R-Mich.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 04:11 PM
Feb 2015
The proposed rules will exclude irrelevant portions of the authority, granted under Title II of the Communications Act. But Republicans, including House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., have criticized the rules as an overreach of regulation that could discourage investment in the telecom business. The vote in the FCC “is just the beginning” and “means an inevitable return to the courts for net neutrality rules, which will lead to more years of uncertainty for consumers and providers,” he said Wednesday during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.

Republicans like Upton, once broadly opposed to net neutrality, have sought to avoid FCC regulation by proposing a bill on the issue that they claim would uphold some of its principles, including that Internet service providers should not use their power to block or slow down the traffic of rival Web services.


http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/02/25/republicans-defy-net-neutrality-ahead-of-fcc-vote

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2015 #1
Now come the lawsuits that will wend their way to the Supreme Court. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #2
If a Repub becomes president couldn't they appoint a new chair of the FCC rurallib Feb 2015 #16
In order to change it, the next President would have to go through a long process Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #20
Thanks rurallib Feb 2015 #22
Oh Hell yes. 99Forever Feb 2015 #3
I don't know that it's so much the oligarchs lost, it's which oligarchs won. Silent3 Feb 2015 #4
Net Neutrality makes competition among the big players, Google, Netflix, Comcast, etc., possible... hunter Feb 2015 #10
+ all I have in my pocket...and wallet! nt DocMac Feb 2015 #15
I hope you don't take anything I said as an argument against any of what you just said... Silent3 Feb 2015 #23
Wow. Color this cynic pleasantly chagrined. closeupready Feb 2015 #5
Before cheering it I'd like to know what was actually in the plan. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2015 #6
Bravo to the millions of Americans that spoke out and got Mr. Wheeler rhett o rick Feb 2015 #7
Aaron Swartz would be so pleased. dixiegrrrrl Feb 2015 #19
We can get **** done if we make a iandhr Feb 2015 #8
Another DU prognastication goes poof ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #9
Another "victory" for the Combustible Hair Club!!!! JoePhilly Feb 2015 #12
That second link is quite eye opening. joshcryer Feb 2015 #13
They'll take credit for it. JoePhilly Feb 2015 #21
"This means an inevitable return to the courts for net neutrality rules" - Fred Upton, R-Mich. Kablooie Feb 2015 #11
The Republicans always depend on Bush appointed judges to get their way. joshcryer Feb 2015 #14
This is fantastic news. Marr Feb 2015 #17
This only happened because... Helen Borg Feb 2015 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yay! Net Neutrality Prev...»Reply #11