And then, you pat yourself on the back? As you thought? One check in your "column?" You're the only one "keeping score," here. Get over yourself!!!
Yes, that poll does say that the vast majority of liberals who were polled using their (left-leaning, biased to the left) methodologies like Clinton--my "personal poll" agrees with that result. Whoopeeeee! That and a cup of coffee will get you ... a cup of coffee.
She hasn't even declared yet. Any poll that says this one or that one is "best" and a shoo-in is meaningless.
The anti-Hillary bunch took that poll and fixated on a number to draw a false conclusion. The pro-Hillary bunch takes a poll that is too far out to matter and uses it to say "Ah ha!" It's all meaningless--all we're doing is arguing over the color of the tooth fairy's wings.
Hillary is not "anti-liberal." She wanted UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE for EVERYONE, fachrissake. And that was back when she was "just" First Lady.
She wanted it before some of the latest "liberal darlings" wanted it. She wanted it when at least one of the latest liberal (cough/not/don't check that national defense posture) darlings was still a registered Republican.
Again--it's all CRAP. Meaningless. Shit to fight over. Something to get gonads in an uproar. Pointless. When people make stuff up, when they lie about what things mean, you need to just CONSIDER THE SOURCE instead of going into a wet-hen dance about it. Ask yourself WHO is saying this shit, and then ask yourself WHY they might be saying it. It's not always because they're "the most liberal." It's not always because the point they claim to be making is the point they actually want to make. It might be the very opposite.
Some people like to shit-stir. No need to feed their enthusiasm.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read