Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

handmade34

(24,017 posts)
10. also...
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 05:02 PM
Apr 2012

new study on analytical thinking and faith

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/04/to-keep-the-faith-dont-get-analytical.html

"...One example comes from a study by neuroscientist and philosopher Joshua Greene and colleagues at Harvard University, published last September in the Journal of Experimental Psychology. They asked hundreds of volunteers recruited online to answer three questions with appealingly intuitive answers that turn out to be wrong. For example, "A bat and ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost?" Although $0.10 comes easily to mind (it's the intuitive answer), it takes some analytical thought to come up with the correct answer of $0.05. People who chose more intuitive answers on these questions were more likely to report stronger religious beliefs, even when the researchers controlled for IQ, education, political leanings, and other factors.

In the same study, another group of volunteers wrote a paragraph about a time in their lives when either following their intuition or careful reasoning led to a good outcome. Those who wrote about intuition reported stronger religious beliefs on a questionnaire taken immediately afterward. If intuitive thinking encourages religious belief, as Greene's study suggested, analytical thinking might encourage disbelief—or so Gervais and his adviser, social psychologist Ara Norenzayan, hypothesized..."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Being born again makes people incredibly stupid. anti-alec Apr 2012 #1
Which is why the values voters scare the crap out of me. Initech Apr 2012 #3
Conversely Cirque du So-What Apr 2012 #4
Profound point in that, anti-alec! There is this one personality/cognitive type that IS getting patrice Apr 2012 #6
When ever anyone asks me if I'm "born again" Sedona Apr 2012 #2
I wonder if that could explain the "Crazy Jesus-Eyes." n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #5
i kind of thought oldhippydude Apr 2012 #14
also makes you more likely to send money to Pat Robertson Enrique Apr 2012 #7
It serves our purpose poorly madamesilverspurs Apr 2012 #8
Exactly. Thank you for saying this. Zalatix Apr 2012 #11
What about those of us who want to push humanity to a greater knowledge? snooper2 Apr 2012 #12
Truth trumps public relations cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #18
I'm sure that was also the rationale behind "The Bell Curve" Zalatix May 2012 #22
Science serves our purposes. Logic and facts serve our purposes. LeftyMom Apr 2012 #21
did they also subdivide by politics? I'm asking since there were many left-leaners who were born MisterP Apr 2012 #9
also... handmade34 Apr 2012 #10
Are people really this stupid? whistler162 Apr 2012 #13
I had a stroke last night and a grand mal seizure this morning. longship Apr 2012 #15
Seems plausible to me. BadgerKid Apr 2012 #16
Polite way of saying that "Born Again" equals brain damaged? toddwv Apr 2012 #17
No, a straightforward way to say that cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #19
A different interpretation of these results: cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #20
Just saying: Not all christian churches define born again in the same way. That experience stutt is jwirr May 2012 #23
I'd love to see Rick Santorum's CAT scan meow2u3 May 2012 #24
Read the ENTIRE article UnconventionalWisdom May 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Being 'Born-Again' Linked...»Reply #10