Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
29. What .223 ammo or 5.56 ammo can't penetrate a vest?
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:41 PM
Feb 2015

The vests are Class IIIA vests which are rated for pistol ammunition. They won't stop any rifle round.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R...for exposure...nt Wounded Bear Feb 2015 #1
I would like to see a $5-10 a bullet tax Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #89
Cool story bro. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #131
Perfect! marym625 Feb 2015 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2015 #52
Puts them in prison for what? Being a dumb-ass is still legal. arcane1 Feb 2015 #53
a very weird little troll? marym625 Feb 2015 #55
very nice person Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #60
I'm going out on a limb here marym625 Feb 2015 #64
MIRT is good, MIRT is strong Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #65
MIRT! my favs! marym625 Feb 2015 #71
uhm. what? marym625 Feb 2015 #54
Pesky negro infringing on Constitutionally protected rednecks' rights. nt onehandle Feb 2015 #3
K & R.... dhill926 Feb 2015 #4
K&R for RP, as usual cyberswede Feb 2015 #5
It's a bad law, being overly-broadly implemented. appal_jack Feb 2015 #6
Unconstitutional? gratuitous Feb 2015 #7
Constitution says you can have guns. Doesn't say anything about bullets. nichomachus Feb 2015 #8
No - it says you can have arms hack89 Feb 2015 #9
I con't see the term "armor piercing" in the definition mikeysnot Feb 2015 #33
I don't have a real problem with this ban - it is political stupidity and ineffective but legal hack89 Feb 2015 #36
My comments were directed to the mistake belief that the 2A does not cover ammunition. mikeysnot Mar 2015 #97
and what ammunition would that be? (warning pictures of ammunition) NSFW Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #99
As long as your choices are informed hack89 Mar 2015 #101
Shhh...don't tell them ATF has walked this back. blueridge3210 Mar 2015 #103
"(B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means" Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #68
Se it can be used in a pistol... mikeysnot Mar 2015 #96
All 5.56 MM or .223 Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #98
So it is body armor piercing... mikeysnot Mar 2015 #105
Let me clarify further metalbot Mar 2015 #106
It doesn't. It is just stupid to focus on this particular bullet. hack89 Feb 2015 #11
seems like the manufacturers shot themselves in the foot when they produced these novelty guns.. frylock Feb 2015 #18
Many shooting enthusiasts have indeed been wary of the possibility. appal_jack Feb 2015 #24
WTF is wrong with gun humpers? Skittles Feb 2015 #28
Your wasting your time... mikeysnot Feb 2015 #34
my English relatives have asked me that question Skittles Feb 2015 #35
Sad isn't it mikeysnot Feb 2015 #37
what kills me (is that a pun?) Skittles Feb 2015 #38
308/7.62 AP is already banned. sir pball Feb 2015 #42
Sometimes you have to wonder if the ATF works for the NRA. nt hack89 Feb 2015 #10
Having a beer with the Rude One is on my bucket list. hifiguy Feb 2015 #12
Is this supposed to make us feel better when we lose more elections? Taitertots Feb 2015 #13
It's a win-win for the Turd Way-ers. appal_jack Feb 2015 #14
should the current law simply be ignored to appease people that likely will NEVER vote for a dem? frylock Feb 2015 #19
The law should be dismissed as unconstitutional. appal_jack Feb 2015 #41
LOL "a sensible reading of the 2nd Amendment" Skittles Feb 2015 #78
How do you read it? appal_jack Feb 2015 #80
you poor thing Skittles Feb 2015 #87
Whatever issues I may have, at least I'm not a condescending asshole. nt appal_jack Feb 2015 #88
actually, you are Skittles Feb 2015 #90
You didn't finish your thought there... appal_jack Mar 2015 #95
You're half right. LanternWaste Mar 2015 #107
Guess you'll just have to empathize with defeat instead. appal_jack Mar 2015 #108
I have long conceded that gun humping paranoid assholes have won Skittles Mar 2015 #118
The actual law says this: beevul Feb 2015 #43
Well of course it should discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2015 #48
re: <CanWeGetASmileyOfSomeoneShootingHimselfInTheFoot> Electric Monk Feb 2015 #81
Highly amusing Matrosov Feb 2015 #15
Limited bans with specific purposes are constitutional hack89 Feb 2015 #16
it's the law.. frylock Feb 2015 #20
That is why banning this particular bullet is fine. hack89 Feb 2015 #21
On this, I respectfully disagree. appal_jack Feb 2015 #45
They like to claim "its the law"...but they're ignoring what the actual law says. beevul Feb 2015 #47
It's actually quite intriguing, given the recent rise of lead-free hunting bullets.. sir pball Feb 2015 #50
What .223 ammo or 5.56 ammo can't penetrate a vest? Savannahmann Feb 2015 #29
Limited declarations with specific statements are rational. Aldo Leopold Feb 2015 #23
They have M855 where you live, but nothing else? NickB79 Feb 2015 #31
knr frylock Feb 2015 #17
Flabby the Deaf Clown's Masturbatorium of Hate Aldo Leopold Feb 2015 #22
& now i can never read the name rush limbaugh again without it echoing in mine ears: NuttyFluffers Feb 2015 #46
I hope Rude will understand that I have already stolen that for my own twisted purposes. 47of74 Mar 2015 #93
Yah! shenmue Mar 2015 #102
Silly question Savannahmann Feb 2015 #25
K&R! n/t billh58 Feb 2015 #26
Except ALL commercial 5.56mm ammo will also penetrate police officer's vests NickB79 Feb 2015 #27
These delicate little flowers are always in a panic mwrguy Feb 2015 #30
Fear. It's how they live their lives notadmblnd Feb 2015 #32
DU's resident gun humpers in particular are pathetic beyond belief Skittles Feb 2015 #39
Pro gun Dems exist. Get use to it. Nt hack89 Feb 2015 #49
this just shows again how firarms owners are treated here. Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #57
Not all firearms owners are "gun humpers". Not by a long shot. MH1 Feb 2015 #67
does not fit me Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #72
There are waaaaaay more DUers not blocked from GCRA than there are those blocked from it. nt Electric Monk Feb 2015 #82
most DU not go to your "safe haven" Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #84
How nice and civil of you Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #51
And somebody like alerting. I'm number one. bravenak Feb 2015 #56
so insults to fellow DU members are OK Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #58
Did we ban that word? bravenak Feb 2015 #59
Nope, but it just sinks to a low level Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #61
I think that you have a good point and that I need to keep that in mind in the future. bravenak Feb 2015 #62
Thank you Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #63
I think the fact that I live in a rural state like Alaska makes me not as anti gun. bravenak Feb 2015 #74
I feel very much the same way Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #75
Free/discounted safety gear actually makes sense. bravenak Feb 2015 #77
Funny, how you call people caring about their rights "delicate little fowers." appal_jack Feb 2015 #66
well I guess what ever floats their boat Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #73
It's a This Modern World reference Electric Monk Feb 2015 #83
another childish insult Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #85
Yup. No doubt this is a funny cartoon, but... appal_jack Feb 2015 #86
dup Skittles Mar 2015 #119
Brilliant marketing strategy by the bullet manufacturers to get people to buy up junk. greatlaurel Feb 2015 #40
I'm pretty sure you're actually quite right.. sir pball Feb 2015 #69
Brilliant strategy to get rid of useless ammo and jacking the price up all out of reason to boot. greatlaurel Feb 2015 #79
you have to BE stupid to be a gun humper Skittles Feb 2015 #76
If you say so... EX500rider Mar 2015 #130
k&r... spanone Feb 2015 #44
"gun fellating right" - LiberalElite Feb 2015 #70
cowards, every one of them Skittles Mar 2015 #109
The 'cowards' wrote to ATF and got the ban stopped. Your sort largely did nothing. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #112
"YOUR SORT" Skittles Mar 2015 #115
Yes, your sort. What did *your* email to the ATF say? How many others did you get to write them? friendly_iconoclast Mar 2015 #132
dup Skittles Mar 2015 #116
Why do pro-gun control types always make tiny penis references? NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #91
They are always thinking about my genitalia hack89 Mar 2015 #92
they have nothing else Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #100
It's twofold linuxman Mar 2015 #111
Awesome! You win this thread. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #114
When the shoe fits.................... anotojefiremnesuka Mar 2015 #122
Well, I see you got all the talking points. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #123
Whatever anotojefiremnesuka Mar 2015 #124
"my experience the vast majority of 'people' who own guns" beevul Mar 2015 #128
Wah! I want my Cha Mar 2015 #94
Wonder if they know almost all centerfire rifle rounds are "armor piercing" ileus Mar 2015 #104
They're not the ones who are "dumb". Cha Mar 2015 #117
LOL...cool story Cha. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #113
Rude Pundit: "Of course, the gun-fellating right has lost its mind over this proposal.." Cha Mar 2015 #120
"He doesn't think the ban will happen; however"... NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #121
I wonder if the Rude Pundit... NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #110
... meegbear Mar 2015 #126
Thanks. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #129
For those who are curious *why* the ban didn't fly benEzra Mar 2015 #125
"Flabby the Deaf Clown's Masturbatorium of Hate" FTW! KamaAina Mar 2015 #127
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit - Gun Nut...»Reply #29