Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Defying Science And Common Sense, New York Bill Would Ban GMOs In Vaccines [View all]One of Benbrook's best-known studies is one published in 2012, which concluded that genetically modified foods have resulted in increased pesticide use, purportedly because weeds are developing resistance to glyphosate.[6][7] However, some critics stated this study was flawed, because Benbrook did not take into account the fact that glyphosate is less toxic than other herbicides, thus the net toxicity may decrease even as the total herbicide use increases.[8][9] In addition, Graham Brookes of PG Economics accused Benbrook of making subjective estimates of herbicide use because the data provided by the National Agricultural Statistics Service doesn't distinguish between genetically modified and non-genetically modified crops. Brookes had published a study whose conclusions contradicted those of Benbrook's earlier in 2012.[10][11] Brookes also stated that Benbrook had made "biased and inaccurate" assumptions.[12] More recently, in December 2013, Benbrook was the lead author of a study which reported that organic milk contained significantly higher levels of heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids.[13] However, the study was funded in part by the organic milk producer Organic Valley, although Allison Aubrey of NPR reported that they had no role in the study's design or analysis.[14]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Benbrook
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Defying Science And Common Sense, New York Bill Would Ban GMOs In Vaccines [View all]
HuckleB
Feb 2015
OP
How fucking stupid can some people be? What's next? Banning GMO created insulin?
Liberal Veteran
Feb 2015
#4
Ask your naturopath if Jimmy Dean Brand All-Natural Insulin is right for you.
Liberal Veteran
Feb 2015
#7
However, a killed vaccine, or attenuated vaccine, is not the same as a genetically engineered vaccine.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#8
I think the biggest danger of GMO foods is that they allow farmers to heavily rely on herbicides
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#12
You just reposted the same article you posted above re: Benbrook's interpretation of the numbers.
HuckleB
Feb 2015
#18
Every scientist who's in Monsanto's pocket agrees. But many others don't. And it's just common sense
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#19
Why do they make herbicide resistant crops? So they can use MORE HERBICIDES and the crops
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#21
You refuse to acknowledge the science, choosing to repeat unsupported anti-GMO cliches.
HuckleB
Feb 2015
#22
You refuse to acknowledge that herbicide-resistant GMO crops were developed precisely in order to allow
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#23
In other words, you are repeating your failure to acknowledge the science of the matter.
HuckleB
Feb 2015
#24
We don't know that today's herbicides are safer, because all the ingredients are not public
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#26
Unlike many of his detractors, Dr. Benbrook is not a shill for the pesticide producers.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#27
Your emotion-based response and baseless, ugly attack against scientists and farmers is noted.
HuckleB
Feb 2015
#28
I'm not attacking scientists or farmers as a group. Just Monsanto and other shills. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#30
You do realize that really poor article from 6 years ago was debunked in the links I've posted.
HuckleB
Feb 2015
#38
There is a continuing argument among groups of scientists -- Dr. Benbrook's work
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#39
As I said, scientists disagree. You are pointing to someone from "PG Economics" who disagrees.
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#50
I realize that. But all it proves is that there isn't a consensus of opinion, which was what
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#56
Actually it suggests the only outlier you seem to be able to provide is pretty much full of shit
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#57
No, there are respected researchers in France and other countries who support Benbrook's work. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#59
No, those scientists are doing their own research. There are multiple "outliers." n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#62
Yes, if you had read the links I provided, all of that would have been explained much better.
HuckleB
Mar 2015
#53
Anti-GMO silliness isn't far from anti-vaccine silliness in its bipartisan nature.
HuckleB
Feb 2015
#34
Just came across this link on twitter on past problems w RotaTeq (genetically engineered vaccine).
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2015
#45
Par for the course. When his bullshit is challenged, he simply throws more bullshit against the wall
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#61