General Discussion

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)

94. How does not voting for one candidate prevent me from voting for the others on my ballot?

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 10:07 AM

Mar 2015

I'm betting your state does not require a straight ticket, I know mine doesn't so I can vote for exactly who I please in any individual race.
One may totally "side" with Democrats and liberals locally, in their state, or at the Federal level while not "siding" with any individual person on the ballot.

Who gets a ballot of "thousands" by the way? Maybe once has mine gone over 1 double sided page and that was because of initiatives not any thousands of anybody.

If you are pro Turd Way and think they are representative of liberal policies (except the global lassiez fare kind) then you don't have to worry about opposing me, I'm already opposing you and always was, you've sided with the right wing in the heart of their agenda, even if you aren't a bigot.

Good, glad you and those you favor aren't vile, sub-human garbage but the politics are still dangerously wrong even if they aren't driven by malicious hate though I don't know how to put supporting, covering, and codifying Bush the Usurper's counter constitutional criminality and warmongering fits even misguided and wrongheaded but at least there is some baseline to work from I guess. At least you won't look up and see me as a thug animal so that is something and nothing to sneeze at compared to the crazed Confederate jackals but still an awfully raw deal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

136 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If Third Way Democrats continue to the right with TPP, union bashing, privatization it's because [View all] whereisjustice Mar 2015 OP

I will not vote to support the revocation of the ACA. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #1

Really? And Hillary is the only Democrat out of 300,000,000 people who supports ACA? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #2

Who said anything about Hillary Clinton? Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #3

Yes, every year conservatives advocate the "reality" that we must support only the most conservative whereisjustice Mar 2015 #4

I am a liberal because I will not vote Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #5

so we should just sit back and let the system tell us who to vote for regardless of principals - we whereisjustice Mar 2015 #7

Never told you to vote for Hillary. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #9

Third way's conservative posturing will cost the election. Why do you want Republicans to win? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #10

Bullshit. If you fail to actively support liberal policies, programs, and laws. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #13

Explain how liberal policies are helped by grooming a single conservative candidate? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #17

We are electing 30 Senators, 435 members of the House, a President and Vice President. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #22

And the Third Way is influencing them all, so once again I ask, why do Democrats want Republicans to whereisjustice Mar 2015 #23

The Democratic Party is not shutting out liberals. We are here. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #30

And there's the claim anti-Hillary=non-Democrat, non-Liberal =.= daredtowork Mar 2015 #46

When people refuse to support liberal policy, programs, and individual rights Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #54

I stand on my comment. nt daredtowork Mar 2015 #61

And I stand by mine. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #64

I swear Aerows Mar 2015 #130

How does not voting for one candidate prevent me from voting for the others on my ballot? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #94

If you nominate H. Clinton then you don't care if the Republicons win. We have better rhett o rick Mar 2015 #33

Only the anti-hillary/anti-thirdway group are talking about nominating Hillary. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #36

The Third Way does not support liberal policies. They support Conservative values. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #39

The anti-thirdway/anti-hillary crowd do not support liberal policies. They are not liberals. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #41

You're funny Scootaloo Mar 2015 #59

Sometimes funny is good. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #65

Good-funny is good. bad-funny is sad. Scootaloo Mar 2015 #78

This is Aerows Mar 2015 #133

What I find curious is that the Conservative Wing of our party really want to be called liberals. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #105

Raises Hand! Aerows Mar 2015 #131

Like whom? ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #127

We need candidates, not only for the White House, but for Congress and local JDPriestly Mar 2015 #80

1+1=2 but 1+0=1 not 2, the only way a vote helps the TeaPubliKlans is if it is added to their total. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #92

Why are generalizing Third Way going against unions? I happen to be a life long union member and Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #6

I don't know many union members who support third way's TPP program. Do you? Can you whereisjustice Mar 2015 #8

You pick out a subject if which has not even been revealed. If the unions has Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #11

Which unions support TPP (or even Third Way for that matter) - I asked a simple question whereisjustice Mar 2015 #12

I dont know nor do I care, dont judge me on being a union member and liking Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #14

How many jobs do you believe should be sent to Asia? How much lower should our wages be? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #15

Twll me exactly what is contained in the TPP, not rumors or judging by any agreements in the past, Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #18

That is a bs demand, given that the agreement is in a secure room. However, the word of people merrily Mar 2015 #26

I know it is in a secure room, details are not known, poster wanted a decisive answer and I Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #89

You support prior agreements? Which ones and why do you think they helped American workers? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #95

It's over, no more questions answered on this thread. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #96

No answers will do that to you every time. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #115

When politicians demand secrecy, it's not so they can throw you a birthday party. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #110

You tell us what could be in the TPP that the unions might like. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #34

What is in TPP unions dislike, again we do not know what is in TPP and I am not going to answer Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #90

You certainly have a lot of posts here for not wanting to comment about information that isn't rhett o rick Mar 2015 #97

see post #96 Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #98

See post 97. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #100

you're talking to the person who was on a kick about the rampant fraud in SSDI for a while. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #29

thanks, that figures, lol whereisjustice Mar 2015 #32

... SidDithers Mar 2015 #48

... ND-Dem Mar 2015 #50

Yeah. I don't like homophobes... SidDithers Mar 2015 #52

... ND-Dem Mar 2015 #53

Question: What's your basis for the assertion, Sid? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #81

The homophobic tropes have a unique flavor profile...here's one I just read in yet another thread Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #109

But how does that prove that the guy's a zombie? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #136

Yup, admitted in this thread to be a Third Wayer LondonReign2 Mar 2015 #129

In the real world it's not possible to support or oppose something that hasn't been written yet. RB TexLa Mar 2015 #16

I agree, until I see the exact wording it is impossible to make a decision. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #19

LMAO. merrily Mar 2015 #28

In the real world something like TPP is designed by conservatives and fast tracked to prevent whereisjustice Mar 2015 #20

Sanders, Warren, Grayson and unions are not living in the real world? DUers know better? merrily Mar 2015 #27

In the real world we've seen parts of it. It may not be final, but we can certainly see the rhett o rick Mar 2015 #35

I support free trade, President Obama doing something doesn't have anything to do with it. RB TexLa Mar 2015 #40

No one has even tried to explain how this TPP, which is way more than a "trade agreement" rhett o rick Mar 2015 #42

Sounds like like you got it all figured out, now get out there with your talking points RB TexLa Mar 2015 #43

Nah, he's too busy crossing his fingers and clapping for zappaman Mar 2015 #62

You support legislation so what is so funny or tricky about wanting to know the benefits of the act? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #99

But you have nothing. Not even talking points. Here's one you can use: "What's good for corporations rhett o rick Mar 2015 #104

Speak up. Aerows Mar 2015 #132

Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #66

If you think Democrats are anti-capitalist BainsBane Mar 2015 #21

Clinton is a conservative Third Way Lobbyist. By unconditionally refusing to challenge her whereisjustice Mar 2015 #24

+10000! Katashi_itto Mar 2015 #25

"Refusing to challenge her" BainsBane Mar 2015 #44

And it just takes one president to push through NAFTA or TPP or another war and it all whereisjustice Mar 2015 #47

i never see people like those who claim to be the most liberal on the internet at local events JI7 Mar 2015 #55

How do you know if you are seeing anonymous posters at local events or not? merrily Mar 2015 #57

based on the things they say JI7 Mar 2015 #58

LOL! merrily Mar 2015 #60

most of them support Hillary for President and i never heard the criticisms of her that i read on JI7 Mar 2015 #67

Covered by my prior post. merrily Mar 2015 #68

people can claim to be anything on the internet so my point is more about those who claim JI7 Mar 2015 #73

Not really. Your point is nothing but insinuation and imagination. merrily Mar 2015 #74

there are scientific polls which people like romney did not understand JI7 Mar 2015 #75

maybe they should - eom dreamnightwind Mar 2015 #69

I never see them whipping the next "free trade" agreement, the next war, or the next austerity scam TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #103

Is that so? BainsBane Mar 2015 #86

It is amazing they have the ability to get involved treestar Mar 2015 #72

That statement is absurd to most of the people in this country treestar Mar 2015 #71

REAGAN would be a commie to the right. He raised taxes, you know. Four times! Scootaloo Mar 2015 #79

Yeah, Reagan raised taxes... Art_from_Ark Mar 2015 #91

Reagan was a blacklisting, red baiting bigot. His director of communications was Pat Buchanan. Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #111

Ive never heard a right winger complain about that in regards to Reagan treestar Mar 2015 #114

+1 Scuba Mar 2015 #88

No one here has ever said there are no differences between the parties. That is a rhett o rick Mar 2015 #38

"The Conservative Wing likes NAFTA, CAFTA, the WTO ..." But far-right repubs hate them? FDR lowered pampango Mar 2015 #87

So you are saying that you support the so called "Free Trade" agreements like the TPP? rhett o rick Mar 2015 #101

I am saying that there is such a thing as a GOOD trade agreement. FDR negotiated plenty of them. pampango Mar 2015 #107

I understand what you say. The problem I am having is that some people that I respect rhett o rick Mar 2015 #113

If "because Obama" was the coin you pretend you'd be shoving Obama's existing efforts down our TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #116

If the policies of FDR are irrelevant to you because 'times are different now' that is your choice. pampango Mar 2015 #120

I believe that certainly the impacts of trade are vastly different. We are talking a time when we TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #121

Excellent summation Populist_Prole Mar 2015 #122

Today progressive countries benefit from FDR's policies on trade, taxes, regulation and safety nets. pampango Mar 2015 #123

I welcome seeing the standards for labor and protection of the environment increased for Americans. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #125

You didn't knock that one out of the park Aerows Mar 2015 #134

Thanks TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #135

Well said. treestar Mar 2015 #70

Excuse me, the "idle left"? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #76

Well said. nt Bobbie Jo Mar 2015 #93

What do unions say about TPP and Fast track? Democrats should fight for jobs and living wages in USA whereisjustice Mar 2015 #31

TY 840high Mar 2015 #37

SEIU too Scootaloo Mar 2015 #82

They live in a patronage bubble daredtowork Mar 2015 #45

EST - I met one of "trainers" of that shit by way of mutal friend. must have been early 80s? whereisjustice Mar 2015 #49

Please double appreciate it XD daredtowork Mar 2015 #56

Last I knew, it had morphed into something called The Forum, but even that was a while ago. merrily Mar 2015 #63

btw - I'd encourage you to edit and repost this as OP whereisjustice Mar 2015 #51

I may do this tomorrow evening daredtowork Mar 2015 #84

please send me a note when you do so I can K & R it :) whereisjustice Mar 2015 #119

This would be a good basis for its own OP n/t Scootaloo Mar 2015 #83

Thanks - maybe tomorrow evening! :) nt daredtowork Mar 2015 #85

+ 1000 nt raouldukelives Mar 2015 #112

Excellent Caretha Mar 2015 #118

The DLC, predecessor of the Third Way, Warpy Mar 2015 #77

Where is your alternative candidate? JoePhilly Mar 2015 #102

Whoa boy fredamae Mar 2015 #106

No, it's all Turd Way. Little sense in getting caught up in the various brands under the umbrella TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #117

K & R GoneFishin Mar 2015 #108

The sole difference between the economic polices of HRC and any Repuke hifiguy Mar 2015 #124

Unfortunately, the bystanders in our myriad foreign wars will continue to be boiled Maedhros Mar 2015 #128

Your concern is noted. Thank you. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #126