Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
3. "sly" "playing the media" (conservative) WAPO "exulted" Hmmm.
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 08:27 PM
Mar 2015

Sounds like Joan Vennochi and Orrin Hatch may have come to bury Warren, not to praise her.

Speaking of which, if you listened and watched carefully when Hatch was supposedly eulogizing Kennedy at the Library service, it was a good thing knives in his back could no longer hurt the newly late Senator. Had the places been reversed, Kennedy would never have done that to Hatch. But then, Kennedy would never have done this to Hatch, either.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, cited a bridge too far from Brooklyn in the Clarence Thomas confirmation debate yesterday, and later apologized to Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., for the goof.

Hatch was trying to knock down charges that the White House had orchestrated the attacks on law professor Anita Hill's credibility, saying at one point that "if anybody believes that," then there is a bridge up "in Massachusetts" they might want to buy.

Later, the apologetic Hatch returned to the Senate floor to say the statement had been a mistake and to ask that it be amended to read a bridge ''in Brooklyn."

Hatch didn't come right out and say so, but clearly he realized his crack could be construed as a low blow at Kennedy, who in 1969 drove a car off a bridge at Chappaquiddick Island, killing a young woman passenger.
WASHINGTON —

Hatch didn't realize that before he opened his nasty piehole on the record? Really? Took the lowest, most gratuitous blow at the man who was supposed to be his best Democratic friend in the Senate?

Yeah, I'm sure Hatch is just pining away for another Ted Kennedy. Something tells me the same is true of Slanter Vennochio, whose point basically is that, at bottom, Kennedy was a centrist compromiser and Warren needs to follow that lead.

Fuck both their jealous asses, sez I.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes!!! zappaman Mar 2015 #1
I devoutly hope so. hifiguy Mar 2015 #2
"sly" "playing the media" (conservative) WAPO "exulted" Hmmm. merrily Mar 2015 #3
For most people, meaning those who want govt to function BainsBane Mar 2015 #4
No kidding. Not the point of my post or, I suspect, of Ms. Vennochio's article, either. merrily Mar 2015 #5
I think it's a flattering piece BainsBane Mar 2015 #10
The real intent wasn't to flatter and what Hatch did to Kennedy is relevant. Sorry you missed both merrily Mar 2015 #14
Wake me Caretha Mar 2015 #11
Democrats working across the aisle does not mean starting at center right. merrily Mar 2015 #15
In this era, with every Republican being totally unreasonable and unreachable, Ken Burch Mar 2015 #35
That may be true BainsBane Mar 2015 #38
Obviously, worrying about presidential politics isn't ever going to be enough. Ken Burch Mar 2015 #42
I like your truthapaloozza festival idea BainsBane Mar 2015 #44
Elizabeth Warren can and will rise higher. n/t Autumn Mar 2015 #6
Perhaps BainsBane Mar 2015 #7
B-b-but...we need a STRONG LEADER! YoungDemCA Mar 2015 #13
Actually, we need a wise, strong, skillful leader who puts the 99% above himself or herself, above merrily Mar 2015 #20
For a long time, Democrats were in the majority--and Kennedy did not start at center right. merrily Mar 2015 #16
Um, I would much rather she be the Original Liz Warren. We already have Great Compromisers. djean111 Mar 2015 #8
Without compromise there is no governance BainsBane Mar 2015 #9
IOW Caretha Mar 2015 #12
"Nervous" is not necessarily the word I would have chosen, but I do take your point. merrily Mar 2015 #17
Try reading BainsBane Mar 2015 #19
The fact you Caretha Mar 2015 #21
You don't know the first thing about my principles or my views BainsBane Mar 2015 #24
Stop Caretha Mar 2015 #26
"A real conversation" BainsBane Mar 2015 #28
Whether or not you have principles, Bain, you do have the tendency Ken Burch Mar 2015 #30
I don't believe I claimed otherwise BainsBane Mar 2015 #40
Deal Caretha Mar 2015 #34
The reason so few of us "know the first thing about (your) principles or (your) views" Ken Burch Mar 2015 #31
You can't be serious BainsBane Mar 2015 #37
I actually agree with most of what you just posted there. It was very eloquent. Ken Burch Mar 2015 #41
I have suggested just that countless times BainsBane Mar 2015 #43
That's a lot of straw men (and personal) insults, given what Caretha's post actually said. merrily Mar 2015 #22
What did her post say? BainsBane Mar 2015 #23
No one lectured you. And Caretha's post said very little. You, however, merrily Mar 2015 #25
This is becoming increasingly tiresome BainsBane Mar 2015 #27
We don't always to settle for half-, third-, or quarter-measures to "make things happen" though. Ken Burch Mar 2015 #33
Let us sincerly hope not! whistler162 Mar 2015 #18
Hopefully not the next Ted Kennedy-as-presidential candidate, though. Ken Burch Mar 2015 #29
No, but she doesn't have a Chappaquiddick in her background BainsBane Mar 2015 #32
The vicious tactics of the Carter people did him in, too. Ken Burch Mar 2015 #36
Well, his run against a sitting President was unorthodox BainsBane Mar 2015 #39
Elizabeth Warren just needs to keep on being Elizabeth Warren. KMOD Mar 2015 #45
Nah. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #46
So now you don't even like Warren? BainsBane Mar 2015 #47
I love Warren MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Elizabeth Warren be t...»Reply #3