General Discussion

langstonhues

(49 posts)

21. This is very serious. What was she thinking by doing that?

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 11:15 PM

Mar 2015

Or what was she hiding by doing this? We already have less and less accountability from banks, from government in general and from our rich employers, now official on the job emails that are being vetted by her staff is 'hillary hating'? Things are getting pretty weird.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

117 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules [View all] applegrove Mar 2015 OP

Sounds like much to do about nothing to me bigdarryl Mar 2015 #1

Better little hiccups like this come out now. applegrove Mar 2015 #4

Is that how DUers felt when Bushco got bashed for this kind of thing? merrily Mar 2015 #9

Your wording is off... Agschmid Mar 2015 #50

This is great. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #90

Numbers are hard...nt SidDithers Mar 2015 #102

So you'd be OK if all Republicans decided to illegally use only their private email, DesMoinesDem Mar 2015 #15

Don't you know, in Hillary's world, "rules are for fools" and only applies to "little people." InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2015 #40

I was just going to ask same. Thanks. 840high Mar 2015 #51

Agreed! They sre going to try anything to bring her down. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #23

Bush White House email controversy arcane1 Mar 2015 #26

IOKIYAR Atman Mar 2015 #38

Indeed. We called it "Emailgate" here at the time, but hopefully this isn't quite as bad. arcane1 Mar 2015 #39

That was then, that is now. (/sarcasm) InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2015 #42

oh good. the next benghazi is here. liberalla Mar 2015 #2

"Possibly Breaking Rules"? It's illegal. There is no way around it. DesMoinesDem Mar 2015 #3

There is if you're Hillary. Does this mean I can score your tix to the coronation? InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2015 #45

See, that's where I get confused. aquart Mar 2015 #72

How do you not have a government email when head of a department? Motown_Johnny Mar 2015 #5

Imagine if the private email company's servers were breached. SoS Email compromised.. X_Digger Mar 2015 #33

Apparently it was Google/gmail. Although anything classified should have been on separate TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #46

It was through Keefer Mar 2015 #66

This is not just some small oversight SheilaT Mar 2015 #6

I'm guessing you didn't trust her yesterday, either. aquart Mar 2015 #36

For some time now I have not seen her SheilaT Mar 2015 #82

I just heard this on Rachel Maddow, and Lawrence O'Donnell will liberalla Mar 2015 #7

Really? Who gives a shit onecaliberal Mar 2015 #8

those that hate Hillary still_one Mar 2015 #10

And anyone with a shred of consistency. Marr Mar 2015 #68

Dipped if I know. Maybe the silly people who think govennment officials should obey laws, whether merrily Mar 2015 #13

I do. 840high Mar 2015 #53

Those who give a shit about transparency in government Abq_Sarah Mar 2015 #59

She turned over personal email so she isn't ducking FOIA onecaliberal Mar 2015 #60

There's a reason why it's supposed to be a .gov email Abq_Sarah Mar 2015 #63

LOL. Her people decided what emails of hers to turn over. DesMoinesDem Mar 2015 #65

Just like the millions bush and Cheney withheld on purpose onecaliberal Mar 2015 #108

She's just like Bush and Cheney. You must be so proud. DesMoinesDem Mar 2015 #112

Yes proud as hell onecaliberal Mar 2015 #114

She also supported the Iraq War just like Bush and Cheney. DesMoinesDem Mar 2015 #115

I do . . . and I don't hate her DrDan Mar 2015 #95

So she broke the law LittleBlue Mar 2015 #11

Did Hillary take your lollipop? aquart Mar 2015 #31

I get it. You love Hillary LittleBlue Mar 2015 #43

When bush coughs up the MILLIONS of "lost" emails onecaliberal Mar 2015 #57

Justifying bad behavior by pointing other bad behavior... Oktober Mar 2015 #83

Just pointing out the previous people did much worse for completely sinister reasons. onecaliberal Mar 2015 #109

That's what I said... Oktober Mar 2015 #111

Again I simply stated that's how it is. onecaliberal Mar 2015 #113

True. (I also love Elizabeth Warren.) aquart Mar 2015 #69

That's depends on the meaning of " 's " I am confident she has life experience HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #34

Laws don't apply to Comrade Eddie Snowden or Julian the Ass treestar Mar 2015 #56

Snowden fled to Russia, and Assange has had to flee in other ways. Obviously, the laws Marr Mar 2015 #70

No, since everything should be transparent and Eddie is a hero for what he did treestar Mar 2015 #94

What a silly argument. Marr Mar 2015 #96

You've discussed breaking the law BainsBane Mar 2015 #81

Obviously, meant to protect her and her Presidential run. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #12

Aside from Obama and MAYBE Biden, she was the highest ranking official in the Obama administration. merrily Mar 2015 #16

It's ludicrous. Also, Hilda Solis, former labor secretary, didn't she get in TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #18

Doesn't look like "protection" to me. aquart Mar 2015 #32

There's no other purpose for it--screen, weed out anything damaging by TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #44

The headline actually was a so what to me... Kalidurga Mar 2015 #14

Cabinet officials don't "set up" their own accounts. Their agencies do this, and TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #17

thank you I didn't know all of that Kalidurga Mar 2015 #20

I wonder if administration people used just her name karynnj Mar 2015 #35

All of these agencies have IT dept's for a reason. Their whole JOB is TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #41

makes sense and that should be determined karynnj Mar 2015 #47

This kind of thing was a big news story during the Bush administration. I'd be surprised if she merrily Mar 2015 #19

Yeah I don't like this Kalidurga Mar 2015 #22

Yes, this is a woman who was mercilessly hounded, hunted, and investigated by determined enemies. aquart Mar 2015 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author Marr Mar 2015 #71

This is very serious. What was she thinking by doing that? langstonhues Mar 2015 #21

If we had had a criminal investigation when Republicans had their public Old and In the Way Mar 2015 #24

I smell a rat here. Just heard on Lawrence O'Donnell's show that this tidbit was discovered napi21 Mar 2015 #27

You are probably right. I will wait too. It was a zinger tho, that OP. langstonhues Mar 2015 #28

I am waiting too. Dawson Leery Mar 2015 #30

I doubt she actually personally sent that many work related emails. Agschmid Mar 2015 #54

Curious. What email did she use as a senator? aquart Mar 2015 #29

I want to hear more before making a judgement. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #37

Ummm.........BFD! The Bush administration "lost" terabytes of emails. Servers wiped clean Gman Mar 2015 #48

She knew she was going to run for President. Why not just do everything by the book, knowing TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #49

This?? This?? will keep her from being president?? Gman Mar 2015 #52

It may, or not, I don't know. But I'm surprised that she thought TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #74

This is some real bad shit krawhitham Mar 2015 #77

Oh my God! We're all gonna die! Gman Mar 2015 #99

We'll shit, if the Bush administration did it it must be OK. DesMoinesDem Mar 2015 #58

I know, right? That's got me gobsmacked. X_Digger Mar 2015 #75

If true, this should disqualify her from successfully running for president mythology Mar 2015 #55

+1 nt RiverLover Mar 2015 #67

Rose Law Firm bullshit, part deux. If she was using the State Department servers...there msanthrope Mar 2015 #61

And according to the times own article it says all of her emails to other agencies would be saved hrmjustin Mar 2015 #64

The point is she wasn't using State Department servers. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2015 #100

Um....NO.....every agency she contacted? Fed servers. Plus..... msanthrope Mar 2015 #101

Her domain hosted more than one email account. jeff47 Mar 2015 #103

If Russia and China have her emails, it's because Comrade Eddie msanthrope Mar 2015 #104

No, they are quite capable of getting into commercial email services without help. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2015 #106

as a US Senator, did she use a dot-gov address? quadrature Mar 2015 #62

Wrong is wrong. Broward Mar 2015 #73

the "i don't give a shit, because republicans" posts are amusing frylock Mar 2015 #76

My reply to the post is: So? demosincebirth Mar 2015 #78

HR1233 didn't take effect until she left state...it was signed 11-26-14 Historic NY Mar 2015 #79

Maybe she had a policy of letting underlings do all her official applegrove Mar 2015 #80

That is an important point in an otherwise routine story wyldwolf Mar 2015 #88

NYT and GOP MSNBC (thanks, COMCAST) have shown their biased hands early. MADem Mar 2015 #84

Yeah. But haters gonna hate...nt SidDithers Mar 2015 #105

Oh well, I guess us peasants aren't entitled to know what those in power are doing dissentient Mar 2015 #85

I'm sorry folks, but this is egregious. Barack_America Mar 2015 #86

I agree. HappyMe Mar 2015 #91

I'm surprised by the number of people making excuses on this thread. Brickbat Mar 2015 #87

I'm not. LWolf Mar 2015 #89

Neither... onyourleft Mar 2015 #98

when dealing with gop on this please remind them of scummy walkers email problems as county exec dembotoz Mar 2015 #92

Tempest in a teapot! Capt. Obvious Mar 2015 #93

It's okay... onyourleft Mar 2015 #97

To those trying the "it's no big deal" spin: 99Forever Mar 2015 #107

"This is a game changer" brooklynite Mar 2015 #110

Sure took the heat off criticism of Bibi, though, for a minute, didn't it? Heh heh. MADem Mar 2015 #117

huma@clintonemail.com << is that somebody we know? quadrature Mar 2015 #116