General Discussion

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

282. I told you I do not take orders from you. You were never on ignore, you WERE ignored, until you

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 02:33 AM

Mar 2015

once again, chose to lie about me to a third party. I told YOU I would correct any lies told about me even if that tactic was used to try to avoid a response.

So here's my standard response to your not so unique personal attacks, do not lie about me to third or fourth parties, because I will correct those lies. Just forget I exist and you will not get any attention from me whatsoever. It is not hard to ignore you unless you choose to use your particular brand of personal attack. THEN I will respond and correct you.

There is nothing I would like better, and I know for a fact this sentiment is shared by so very many other DUers, than not to have any interaction with you at all.

I notice you have not said whether or not you know anyone named 'karin', but don't bother, I want no interaction with you at all which I have told you before.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

301 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Glenn Greenwald blasts Hillary Clinton: �The ultimate guardian of bipartisan status quo corruption� [View all] RiverLover Feb 2015 OP

Greenwald. LOL...nt SidDithers Feb 2015 #1

LOL RiverLover Feb 2015 #9

He's going to be speaking at a memorial lecture for a pro-lyncher msanthrope Feb 2015 #11

I see neither you nor Sid can argue that he's wrong about this. Scuba Feb 2015 #13

I don't have to argue on behalf of HRC--she speaks for herself. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #33

Yes she does. raindaddy Feb 2015 #37

And Glenn was a Wall Street attorney--his firm worked for Sachs--for money. Pot, meet kettle....nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #38

So... you're saying corruption knows its own stink. Veilex Feb 2015 #53

I'm saying that Mr. Greenwald is the last person who should complain about GOldman Sachs. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #58

"Mr. Greenwald is the last person who should complain about GOldman Sachs" Veilex Feb 2015 #71

He was a "Wall Street attorney" for 18 months, right after he graduated from law school in 1994. deurbano Feb 2015 #189

Framing at its best. Veilex Feb 2015 #216

You would think after all this time they could come up with SOMETHING to smear him with. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #227

*Nod* Veilex Feb 2015 #231

What was funny in one of the emails where HB Gary named Greenwald as someone to include in the smear sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #232

I love watching people shred bullies. Veilex Feb 2015 #236

Lol, I used to go to his blog just to watch him in action with right wing trolls. He could have sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #238

Greenwald smears anti-war protesters in defense of Irag war kfreed Oct 2015 #296

You're attributing something raindaddy said here to Greenwald . . . markpkessinger Feb 2015 #124

Still attacking the source I see. Scuba Feb 2015 #74

Well, that's what happens when you have nothing else and are desperate... BeanMusical Feb 2015 #79

msanthrope has less-than-nothing nikto Feb 2015 #162

Lol! +1 BeanMusical Feb 2015 #166

And I won't be voting for Greenwald for President! raindaddy Feb 2015 #78

Pot calling kettle black does not mean kettle is not black. thesquanderer Feb 2015 #151

And Hillary was a Goldwater Girl. Fawke Em Feb 2015 #207

As a teenager...but Glenn was an adult. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #210

And Elizabeth Warren was once a Republican Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #275

True, but then she's not a white supremacist tea bagger either, so there's that:) kfreed Oct 2015 #298

LOL pocoloco Feb 2015 #45

I have heard enough from HRC to make a decision. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #194

Libertarian Glenn Greenwald wants NSA privatization kfreed Oct 2015 #295

Still no argument that he's wrong, just that Democrats shouldn't like him. Scuba Oct 2015 #299

I see you have nothing to say, again, about the subject matter of the OP. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #24

And I see you have nothing to say about Greenwald working for Allen West. I understand that. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #35

I see you're still trying the 'let me use the title box to smear Greenwald' tactic, sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #39

I'm pithy, Sabrina. You should try it. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #40

So is Bill O'Reilly, no thanks! Lol! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #44

"I prefer 'substance' to 'pithiness'." Veilex Feb 2015 #56

"stood up for something"? What's he doing living in Brazil? George II Feb 2015 #59

"What's he doing living in Brazil?" At a guess, I'd say... Veilex Feb 2015 #75

Did you really ask that question on DU, AGAIN? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #87

We have the answer that HE gives, which was rendered moot years ago, and..... George II Feb 2015 #91

It was never rendered 'moot'. This question has been answered every time it has been used to sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #97

I just added more to my post - his reason for not living here, HIS reason, was DOMA. George II Feb 2015 #101

I know what his reason is. And it has not changed. Again, what does that have to do with his WORK? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #108

... Veilex Feb 2015 #217

Not JUST DOMA...but thats certainly part of it... Veilex Feb 2015 #218

Thank you, sabrina 1 Thespian2 Feb 2015 #172

You're welcome, Thespian2 and thank you for doing so also. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #178

Some of us will fight anyway Thespian2 Feb 2015 #180

+1000 LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #205

They should give up. Clearly his record is so clean Bank of America who had a contract out for bid sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #228

Bill O'Reilly is not 'pithy.' Sabrina. He's terse. There's a difference. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #65

Oh, my! Look at you correcting someone's usage. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #69

'pithy' immediately brought O'Reilly to mind, because you know, he's 'terse' he claims, unlike sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #94

I didn't get bent out of shape---I'm laughing at you following me from thread to thread, trying to msanthrope Feb 2015 #140

That's Bill O'Reilly's favorite word, 'pithy', describing how 'terse' he is as compared to Liberals sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #89

She's making a list: OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #152

Thanks for reminding me. I am so incredibly flattered by those, several of whom I do not even know, sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #177

Wow. OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #184

Thank you! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #187

... Number23 Feb 2015 #223

I remember that howler. OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #224

You listen to Sean Hannity? Wow! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #233

Nope. OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #259

Thank you, that was another example of someone here who obviously listens to these old Right Wing sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #260

... OilemFirchen Feb 2015 #262

Again, only Faux/Hannity viewers focus on PEOPLE, specifically Liberal Dems while Dems focus on sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #263

Notice how the less she has to say, the longer the posts get??? Number23 Feb 2015 #266

That was a great thread! Completely forgot about it. Thanks to all my fans for keeping these files. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #226

Sabrina, everyone knows that your posts grow longer, somehow more incoherent and your use of the Number23 Feb 2015 #242

Everyone? You speak for ALL DUers here? Omg, that's funny. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #245

If you reply to me first, dear, then I am not the one stalking you. Number23 Feb 2015 #265

Okay, I'll accept that. But I was certain that there were a few who did not agree with sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #267

It took you two days to come up with this idiocy? Number23 Mar 2015 #270

I think we need a poll to decide this once and for all. It seems to be so important to you. sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #271

So when told to "put up or shut up" you respond with these eight lines of nothing Number23 Mar 2015 #276

I'm sure you don't mean to, but you keep paying me compliments. Of course I don't fool anyone, sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #278

I will now give you my standard response I've reserved for only you and three others in all of my Number23 Mar 2015 #280

I told you I do not take orders from you. You were never on ignore, you WERE ignored, until you sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #282

I still don't understand how his supporters here on DU would defend this Libertarian BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #107

Was he talking about a democrat? I thought it was about Hillary Clinton. Bugenhagen Feb 2015 #156

Greenwald prefers Feingold. So do I and think he should run among several other Democrats. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #208

Where did Greenwald say he prefers Feingold? Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #252

I'd love to see that link, too. nt MADem Mar 2015 #284

DU is infested with Libertarians kfreed Oct 2015 #297

Yep. They should change the name of this site now that's clear. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #300

What is your point? nikto Feb 2015 #161

+1000 n/t sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #234

Can you imagine the outcry if Clinton did that? joshcryer Feb 2015 #192

so he's correct isn't he!? n/t wildbilln864 Feb 2015 #19

Yes! Greenwald! 99Forever Feb 2015 #22

SidDithers. LOL...nt DesMoinesDem Feb 2015 #23

Lol! n/t sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #25

B'WHAHAA! MrMickeysMom Feb 2015 #67

... Enthusiast Feb 2015 #195

I can still remember when Greenwald had credibility uhnope Feb 2015 #169

LOL L0oniX Feb 2015 #175

Thanks Sid, you said Progressive dog Feb 2015 #197

Haters gonna hate;) grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #203

He'll be in TX to pick up his Koch stipend, soon...he knows what side his bread is buttered on, and MADem Feb 2015 #254

Does he get any donations from Goldman Sachs by any chance? Speaking of bread and butter and all sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #272

A stipend is not a donation--that Koch money is payment made for value received. nt MADem Mar 2015 #283

It certainly won't help him to get elected so frankly I don't care. I do care however about who sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #285

Well, he's not running, so what's your point? MADem Mar 2015 #287

That IS my point. He is not a politician so cannot influence policies, unlike those who sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #288

He's speaking to a bunch of wingnuts at yet another Koch - funded think tank. MADem Mar 2015 #289

Yep Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #274

Greenwald... Autumn Feb 2015 #2

"Bipartisan status quo corruption." Nice phrase. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2015 #3

I would have thought that description would also be apt for Jebbie... truebrit71 Feb 2015 #4

Yep. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #6

That was my first thought. He's not wrong. nt laundry_queen Feb 2015 #167

I agree, based on luck of the stopped-clock. tridim Feb 2015 #5

Glenn evidently thinks Rand Paul is going to run as a Democrat Fumesucker Feb 2015 #7

He's more into Russ Feingold RiverLover Feb 2015 #10

I spose Feingold is going under the DU bus next. nt grasswire Feb 2015 #17

Greenwald was always a supporter of Feingold, one of our best Senators throughout sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #26

I agreed with 99% of Russ Feingold's policy positions. 2banon Feb 2015 #201

What an apt moniker you have. :-} n/t DeSwiss Feb 2015 #70

Greenwald would prefer Russ Feingold airc. So would I or Sherrod Brown, Bernie, Kucinich, Warren ... sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #222

Well untill we can come up with a more viable candidate. pennylane100 Feb 2015 #8

I disagree�I think Clinton is a very sad last resort... CoffeeCat Feb 2015 #12

+1,000 "If she's our nominee, I will be politically homeless." Scuba Feb 2015 #15

Not to mention actually homeless with all the jobs that will TBF Feb 2015 #121

I so agree. RiverLover Feb 2015 #16

well said! and thanks for saying it! wildbilln864 Feb 2015 #20

Very well said, CoffeeCat ... sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #27

I actually agree with most of this, but a last resort nonetheless, right? randys1 Feb 2015 #28

Then turnout will probably head towards midterm election levels and... kristopher Feb 2015 #54

Boy you better hope not, a Woman of child bearing years life wont be worth a plug nickel randys1 Feb 2015 #109

That has never came close to occurring in the post war period but one can dream DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #112

Agreed. Clinton vs. Bush will be lowest voter turnout ever, I suspect Dems to Win Feb 2015 #114

Support for her is FAR from lukewarm. In fact, it's incredibly strong. NYC Liberal Feb 2015 #55

Wendy Davis got strong enthusiasm from the same people, came no where near winning. n/t betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #86

She hasn't beat the right-wing assholes yet. CanadaexPat Feb 2015 #155

Oh that's right Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #277

Absolutely... MrMickeysMom Feb 2015 #73

"But do you want Jeb to win?" is a pretty pathetic response" BeanMusical Feb 2015 #96

Yeah, I've come around this, also. I will not vote for her. closeupready Feb 2015 #134

Same here. Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #159

Same with me. 840high Feb 2015 #174

IMHO Hillary is Jeb's best chance to win. zeemike Feb 2015 #173

Bernie Sanders said he has not decided whether he would run as an Independent or a Dem red dog 1 Feb 2015 #68

that's kinda odd cuz mopinko Feb 2015 #165

Has the Dem Leadership asked him to run? They should have by now. I don't think he sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #235

Quote: If Bernie Sanders plans to takes shots at Hillary Clinton, he�s saving his ammo. MADem Mar 2015 #286

"Greenwald endorses Hillary 101 percent: leftbaggers fall for REPUBLICAN LIES by demanding that Dems MisterP Feb 2015 #14

Glen Who? Oh... the guy who doesn't like Hispanic people... and supports a traitor... uponit7771 Feb 2015 #18

I did not know that he dislikes Hispanic people. pennylane100 Feb 2015 #66

Lol, neither did anyone else. The things you 'learn' on DU these days! sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #221

What is wrong with these people. pennylane100 Feb 2015 #243

You're not the only who has noticed that. 'a wingnut hangout'! I agree. They are either emulating sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #244

He doesn't like Latinos? DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #120

I guess that's why he lives in Latin America and why he chose a Latino as his life long partner?? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #220

Clarence Thomas?! stop... jus... stop uponit7771 Feb 2015 #225

Clinton LOL Capt. Obvious Feb 2015 #21

K and R bigwillq Feb 2015 #29

Blah, blah, blah...ya gots no cred Mr. Greenwad. SoapBox Feb 2015 #30

Do you disagree with something he said? sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #34

So much attacking the messenger JonLP24 Feb 2015 #168

Yes, the 'he hates Latinos' one was especially interesting. Considering sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #181

Recently seeing Snowden cry because of concerns with his sick girlfriend JonLP24 Feb 2015 #185

No one is human to them, they are either 'assets' or 'enemies'. They have lost all their humanity sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #186

Hillary is a fine example of the ultimate "Not as Bad" 3rd Way politician. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #31

Great quote. nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #48

Please spend some time describing Rand Paul for us, Mr G. blm Feb 2015 #32

Not a chance he ever touches the Pauls. Not a chance. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #36

Glenn Greenwald: Rand Paul is a panderer and a fraud RiverLover Feb 2015 #42

LOL - It took him till Jan2015 to quit loving Rand so much? blm Feb 2015 #63

Asked and answered. I see your goalposts are slipping. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #76

Not at all. In fact, they're dug in pretty deep. blm Feb 2015 #150

Yes they are dug deep LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #211

So you wish to stubbornly insist, anyway, eh? blm Feb 2015 #214

You may not be consciously mimicking the MSM LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #219

I say GG took a real long time to see Paul for EXACTLY who he is. blm Mar 2015 #291

You are so stuck in your black and white world LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #292

Well - YOU trust him implicitly - good for you. blm Mar 2015 #293

Move on? where? LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #294

lol, just admit you're shit was called. Marr Feb 2015 #230

So, you were wrong, which is okay, we all are sometimes. Where did you get the impression sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #273

Where did I get the impression he supported Rand Paul? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #279

Supported him, or supported something he said at the time? There's a difference . I eg, cannot sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #281

Exactly - GG's supported Paul and now his fan base wants to pretend blm Mar 2015 #290

Lol, these attempts at smears of journalists AND of other DUers are not going so well lately. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #251

Rand Paul is more his type Renew Deal Feb 2015 #41

Please see post 42. BeanMusical Feb 2015 #98

Now's that just asking for a flame war! YoungDemCA Feb 2015 #43

For someone who hates Washington and Democratic pols Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #46

I think you mean "Brazil". nt RiverLover Feb 2015 #47

No, I think she means Brasil OKNancy Feb 2015 #52

In Portuguese it is spelled "Brasil" Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #62

Were you speaking Portuguese? nt truebluegreen Feb 2015 #104

I like using native names for countries when I can Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #106

Glenn Greenwald is an American citizen--always has been. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #83

I thought he was a dual-citizen whose primary year-round residence is in Rio Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #84

Permanent visa. deurbano Feb 2015 #171

He needs to apply for citizenship and vote there Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #193

I was simply letting you know his actual citizenship status... just as I previously let you know deurbano Feb 2015 #213

Sorry...As you can see, Greenwald brings out the worst in me Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #215

Let's get a little truthiness in this thread. Just because someone writes it, doesn't make it true. OKNancy Feb 2015 #49

So let's nominate someone who didn't vote for bad laws because she was scared. Dems to Win Feb 2015 #128

Nice post Nancy. But this thread is for those that think that Greenwald's opinion of Hillary matters Number23 Feb 2015 #129

For people who care about the NSA more than health care, economic geek tragedy Feb 2015 #50

How about for people who care about the NSA elias49 Feb 2015 #64

She's still far superior to anyone on the R side. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #77

I will focus on electing progressives to Congress betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #95

So you are actively hoping a Republican beats her in 2016? geek tragedy Feb 2015 #99

I didn't vote for Coakley either. betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #125

So you helped elect Scott Brown in 2010. Purity troll lacks purity of heart nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #127

I helped Liz Warren betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #130

Ya sure you did. nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #137

I wouldn't even waste time arguing with those that won't vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. still_one Feb 2015 #147

After blasting Hillary, he should blast smearmongers who launch attacks against him RufusTFirefly Feb 2015 #51

Insider = agents of the oligarchs. Outsider = everyone else. nt valerief Feb 2015 #57

Hillary Roddam Clinton, Queen of the Blue Dogs, and would-be Triangulator-in-Chief. blkmusclmachine Feb 2015 #60

K&R. Brilliant analysis. JDPriestly Feb 2015 #61

He is allowed his opinion but I am still voting for Hillary if she runs. hrmjustin Feb 2015 #72

In all seriousness -- Maybe Greenwald needs to Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #80

Jeb vs Hillary.. of course I am voting Hillary! TerrapinFlyer Feb 2015 #81

Or they only oppose the Bush Dynasty and pretend that the Clintons are not betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #88

So says Greenwald, the Putin lover. pnwmom Feb 2015 #82

Hmm how come that sounds like you are either with us or with the terrorists? betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #90

Greenwald is a libertarian. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #92

Assad's opposition were mostly Isis. betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #93

Two lies combined with an unfounded insinuation that someone voted for Bush because geek tragedy Feb 2015 #100

Pointing out that Obama hired on neocons in the state department and they wanted to punish Putin is betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #113

How is wanting Paul to defeat Clinton in 2016 reasonable? nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #115

I don't want Paul to defeat Clinton betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #118

Mmmm hmmmm, geek tragedy Feb 2015 #119

How come it is ok to support W in the past but not suppose it is because you are a neocon? betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #122

When people spend most of their time talking about how we'd be better geek tragedy Feb 2015 #123

When people use Bush rhetoric to support neocon views they open themselves up to obvious commentary betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #132

Bush campaigned on behalf of Hillary Clinton? nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #133

Clinton and Obama supported Lieberman over Lamont betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #135

Yes, unlike you, Clinton and Obama supported the Democratic nominee nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #136

Lamont was the dem nominee betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #138

They supported the incumbent LIEberman during the primary, but Lamont in the general election nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #139

Hillary gave a tepid endorsement as did Obama. Bill betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #145

How come suddenly it's not okay to applaud people who realize they were wrong and then go on sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #209

Please stop with the personal insults. No, I didn't support any Republican, ever. pnwmom Feb 2015 #105

That one thinks people who don't prefer Putin and Rand Paul geek tragedy Feb 2015 #110

Greenwald has spoken for himself on his political affiliation. Btw, Drake is a Republican. sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #102

A Libertarian is one who won't admit in public they really vote Republican! TerrapinFlyer Feb 2015 #142

He is a civil Libertarian which means he agrees with Libertarians on some issues betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #146

And he prefers Putin to Clinton. Enough said. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #148

"You're either with us or with the terrorists!" George W Bush. n/t betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #153

+1 Phlem Feb 2015 #163

He preferred Saddam to America too. And all the rest of us here on DU. Was that meant as sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #237

+1, for the post title itself uponit7771 Feb 2015 #212

Oh Glenn, you are such a Clinton Hater davidpdx Feb 2015 #85

And he likes Pol Pot or something. BeanMusical Feb 2015 #103

LOL, he'll be pining for Barack Obama by the time 2017 rolls around nt geek tragedy Feb 2015 #111

He'll be pining for the fjords. Major Hogwash Feb 2015 #190

Why am I not surprised? treestar Feb 2015 #116

Troof AzDar Feb 2015 #117

bump for all the GGDS sufferers with nothing but a "LOL" defense stupidicus Feb 2015 #126

"Dem efforts to hand Hillary the nomination without contest." (?) BeyondGeography Feb 2015 #131

Wait.. you mean the people who want to vote for her actually count? TerrapinFlyer Feb 2015 #141

K&R ReRe Feb 2015 #143

There's a lot of guardians on this board too whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #144

Anyone that disagrees with the title can't seriously believe it isn't true JonLP24 Feb 2015 #149

Progressives pay a high price for allowing the Democratic blogs to dominate their discourse. n/t betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #154

Handing her the nomination without contest libodem Feb 2015 #157

HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Feb 2015 #158

Hillary is basically a Reagan-Republican except for her support of abortion rights and Gay Marriage nikto Feb 2015 #160

Greenwald Nails It Yet Again cantbeserious Feb 2015 #164

Hillary Clinton, salt of the Earth, fighting for working families, taking on Wall Street corruption whereisjustice Feb 2015 #170

K & R ...for pissing off all the right people. L0oniX Feb 2015 #176

You better believe it! Bobbie Jo Feb 2015 #179

Lol, that's for sure! Two Academy Awards, one Director's Guild Award for the Documentary detailing sabrina 1 Feb 2015 #182

Papa Paul Whore Blast Hillary,,,,,, Cryptoad Feb 2015 #183

Dude, she is not the "ultimate" anything. This is like the GOP calling Kerry the "most liberal" McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #188

You got that right. Greenwald's hyperbole truly knows no limits. randome Feb 2015 #239

An example of both parties agreeing is America = Capitalism. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #191

K&R! This post deserves hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Feb 2015 #196

Of course I am voting Hillary. stonecutter357 Feb 2015 #198

K & R GoneFishin Feb 2015 #199

Insiders vs Outsiders - Stating the Obvious, but it's apparently required to be repeated 2banon Feb 2015 #200

Greenwald is right about Madmiddle Feb 2015 #202

Hillary's the Future, we need team work with all Democrats!!! Attack GOP, not democrats!!! lewebley3 Feb 2015 #204

Hillary's the Past & we ARE attacking GOP!!! RiverLover Feb 2015 #206

This really irritated the usual apologists for bipartisan status quo corruption. Marr Feb 2015 #229

It would be different if Greenwald actually gave a shit about Dems Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #246

Greenwald: "Rand Paul is a panderer and a fraud." Marr Feb 2015 #249

Yeah, he had a pissy-fit falling out after the Israel thing Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #250

Can you cite one of his promotions of a Paul candidacy? /nt Marr Feb 2015 #253

He hasn't come straight out and said "Paul 2016!!!!", but... Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #255

"Greenwald's butt buddy"? Seriously? Marr Feb 2015 #257

I criticize the party constantly Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #264

Who do we think Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders will vote for? randome Feb 2015 #240

is appeal to authority the best you have? TheSarcastinator Feb 2015 #241

I'm not 'appealing to authority'. randome Feb 2015 #258

OMG WHAT WILL THE SWOONERS SAY Skittles Feb 2015 #247

Let me try to reel this back in the boat: Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #248

Just wondering: Did everybody forget this? Blue_Tires Feb 2015 #256

He loves to use the word 'fuck', doesn't he? Makes you wonder what kind of neuroses drive him. randome Feb 2015 #261

kick woo me with science Mar 2015 #268

I agree. LWolf Mar 2015 #269

ah, you have to pull this old piece out of the toilet. Sad case for you. riversedge Oct 2015 #301