Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell: Clinton Using Private Email ‘Stunning Breach of Security’ [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)29. And I have video of O'Donnell proudly saying to Greenwald he's not a progressive, either.
O'Donnell said then he's a Socialist, because 'progressives' are evil, doncha know. But now he's going with conservative billionaire owned MSNBC for the bucks!
This is just tossing anything that the GOP Koch Libertarian M$M thinks will stick - the outrage du jour - just using Segretti's method. It's been working for 40 years, why stop now?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell: Clinton Using Private Email ‘Stunning Breach of Security’ [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Mar 2015
OP
In tennis, they call these "unforced errors." Yet another political gift to Rethuglians.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#26
Excellent point. If nothin else, we lose using that issue to further weaken Walker. That wud be regrettable.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#104
I don't think it has been confirmed by reputable reporting. Apparently, WashPo & NYT are still investigatin the story, so to be fair, we need to wait before passin final judgment.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#68
Encryption requires specific set up on both ends of an email (for every recipient).
KeepItReal
Mar 2015
#118
It was stupid in the extreme & tees up the obvious argument that Hillary lacks judgment in security matters, showin she's not Presidential material.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#24
I'm guessing Hillary knows more about violations of privacy than you can even imagine.
aquart
Mar 2015
#56
That's an interesting "twist" (pun intended) to the security issue, though if Hillary offers that as a possible explanation, not sure that's going to fly with most people. Maybe; we'll see.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#66
That is not actually factual. You can use decryption technologies with public and private keys on
still_one
Mar 2015
#111
That wasn't my point, you made a statement that using commercial email could not be secure. I was
still_one
Mar 2015
#114
I had a pretty close inside view with what happened with Sarah Palin's email hack...
cascadiance
Mar 2015
#71
I'd like to see that too. While the excuse "everyone does it" won't fly with a lot of people, it would lessen the damage that's already out there....
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#109
No one could have predicted that using unsecure email as SoS could lead to controversy
Fumesucker
Mar 2015
#3
Ya think? Yes, way overdue. We have a deep bench; plenty of qualified potential candidates who set a good example and demonstrate sound judgment.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#6
Good analogy ram. For too long, the Clintons have held members of the Democratic Party hostage. Some of 'em are still sufferin from Stockholm Syndrome.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#21
I think there was a bit of swelling around the eye--a bit of pan stick covered it.
MADem
Mar 2015
#39
When is it ever justifiable to begin throwin objects at your spouse in response to some argument you're engaged in?
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#73
No, it's not "OK" but in this instance I can see her POV and appreciate her frustration.
MADem
Mar 2015
#57
Wow! So if the roles were reversed, you would appreciate & excuse Bill's visceral reaction of throwin a lamp at Hillary?
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#79
If you mistake challenge and objection for "hectoring," you need to go do your homework.
MADem
Mar 2015
#134
Just prefer Dems not TELEGRAPH ultimate support 4 even the worst candidate as u say (agree w/ ur premise) so Hillary won't take our vote 4 granted & will move left on issues
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#144
Apparently, like the rule against government officials' use of personal email to conduct non-emergency govt business, there's an exception for Hillary. Didn't you get the memo?
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#75
Holding someone to a rule NOT IN EXISTENCE till 2 years after she left her job?
aquart
Mar 2015
#107
Hillary, once again, shows incredible lack of judgment - seems to be a pattern with her. Time for Elizabeth to step up.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#5
Yeah, because being a registered Republican as late as 1996 shows better judgment?
MADem
Mar 2015
#41
I will say, I doubt she or her staff would put sensitive or classified
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#18
Hey--that was a beaut of a find, and ALL CREDIT TO YOU! Talk about much ado about NADA!!!
MADem
Mar 2015
#50
Actually, the personal email was considered government property, you'll notice.
aquart
Mar 2015
#119
That was about her stupid sniper lie or are you claiming she took fire after all?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#145
There's more than one Fed reg in play here, and the other pertinent one was enacted in 2009
ARMYofONE
Mar 2015
#148
The archivist of the United States disagrees with you, and he's the final arbiter, not you, not an
MADem
Mar 2015
#149
I find it rather sad that so many here at DU are not just willing, but EAGER, to
MADem
Mar 2015
#139
Let's be clear: You are quoting a parody NOT Hillary who NEVER said those stupid words.
aquart
Mar 2015
#46
No it isn't. The wingnuts WANT it to be, but since they've done the very same thing, they have no
MADem
Mar 2015
#36
The State Dept. is no paragon of security. Chelsea Manning leaked 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables.
SunSeeker
Mar 2015
#31
And I have video of O'Donnell proudly saying to Greenwald he's not a progressive, either.
freshwest
Mar 2015
#29
Trying to blame this on lack of notice to Hillary and/or on her lawyers or staff is laughable and
merrily
Mar 2015
#47
See link at post 43. There was no "federal regulation" until two years after Clinton left State. nt
MADem
Mar 2015
#51
The Secretary of State is not an "ordinary federal worker." Surely you realize this.
MADem
Mar 2015
#60
On the face of it, her decision to use a private email account simply makes no sense.
MBS
Mar 2015
#63
I hope, in the last 24 hours, you've had a chance to see that this was bullshit, it was a NYT
MADem
Mar 2015
#138
Yes, Judy Miller's NYT, and COMCAST's MSNBC....and they eat it up like the cat's cream. nt
MADem
Mar 2015
#58
I agree the NYT is guilty as charged, tho it was fed those lies by the Bush admin that stooped to a new level of corruption that caught people off-guard.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#70
Yes ur right-can't take a news person seriously 4 reportin news esply if it shows the chosen candidate ina negative light based on their exercise of extremely poor judgment.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#87
It appears that my theory is becoming a reality regarding MSNBC's reason for the lineup shakeup.
BlueCaliDem
Mar 2015
#84
A one day old story...gimme a break we won't know the truth for a couple of days
sailfla
Mar 2015
#90
If tru, it wud be shockingly stupid on Hillary's part. We shud know ina few days, but if we don't hear somethin soon, it's likely the news is NOT good...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#106
O’Donnell lost all credibility when he freaked out over Obama's prayer breakfast speech.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#122
Naw, she was just proving that she doesn't have to answer a phone call at 3 AM.
Major Hogwash
Mar 2015
#140