Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
5. oh come on. You want to criticize Hillary that do it on substance. The IWR or patriot act, or
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 01:08 PM
Mar 2015

other positions you disagree with.

Has the media even asked her view on this?

They will eventually, and you will get an answer.

These straw man arguments against Hillary do nothing to further the legitimate points you are making in the OP.

Same thing goes for your comment about silent Democrats. Have they been questioned by the media? Feinstein said Feinstein calls Netanyahu 'arrogant'.

Perhaps we can at least wait until the dust settles a little bit before assuming this Democratic silence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If by "rarely" you mean "frequently," brendan120678 Mar 2015 #1
I'm not sure that enlightenment Mar 2015 #7
How did Boehner do an end run around the Constitution? SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #23
Boehner's an ass. It's like slapping your mother in the face. elias49 Mar 2015 #28
Actually, enlightenment Mar 2015 #32
Actually, in the link you provided SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #33
Your interpretation. enlightenment Mar 2015 #35
Not much to interpret, he says it's not a violation SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #38
You don't have to break the law Aerows Mar 2015 #47
I agree 100% SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #57
Well at least Aerows Mar 2015 #60
Protocol requires that he notify the WH. He did not. And neither did the Israeli Ambassador, who sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #54
Good luck getting Congress SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #58
I'm talking about a law to 'inform'. That is what should have happened, but it didn't. They violated sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #59
They have NEVER addressed Congress without arranging it with POTUS, and NEVER addressed Congress pnwmom Mar 2015 #16
It's not treason Aerows Mar 2015 #56
It's not treason sharp_stick Mar 2015 #2
It's "treachery" common for Boehner, a new level for Israeli leaders HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #4
thank you Bucky Mar 2015 #19
Couldn't agree more SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #25
Yup. Agschmid Mar 2015 #34
Yep. Aerows Mar 2015 #55
It is in fact fairly common. I am not sure where you get your info from. Mass Mar 2015 #3
oh come on. You want to criticize Hillary that do it on substance. The IWR or patriot act, or still_one Mar 2015 #5
why should Hillary comment at all? misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #9
You are correct she is under no obligation to comment. However, if and when she plans to run for still_one Mar 2015 #12
I expect thats precisely how she sees it. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #13
yup. No argument from me still_one Mar 2015 #14
Madeleine Albright has no dog in this fight, but she spoke up. PADemD Mar 2015 #22
Good for her. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #27
If she wants our votes in a presidential election she owes it to us tularetom Mar 2015 #31
He started it with mythology and ended it with mythology. nt arthritisR_US Mar 2015 #6
some dare call everything treason Enrique Mar 2015 #8
bibi's speech achsadu Mar 2015 #10
"he was treated like a hero (that he is not)" EX500rider Mar 2015 #26
Oh groan..are you serious? elias49 Mar 2015 #29
Dem Reps on C-SPAN2 Duppers Mar 2015 #11
So Pelosi has just come out and dissed it. Others will follow still_one Mar 2015 #15
IT'S NOT TREASON leftynyc Mar 2015 #17
here is why it is treason DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #18
Making policies they oppose harder to implement is still not treason. Seriously, buy a dictionary. Bucky Mar 2015 #20
OH I do know what the word means DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #24
I think that ship already sailed. nt elias49 Mar 2015 #30
Here is why it's not. onenote Mar 2015 #21
Very well done leftynyc Mar 2015 #37
You know Aerows Mar 2015 #43
100% agreement on that leftynyc Mar 2015 #61
Treason? Aerows Mar 2015 #41
One of the most incomprehensible, babbling OPs in DU history, which is saying something. hugo_from_TN Mar 2015 #36
So you do not actually have a response DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #39
Bibi Aerows Mar 2015 #40
add to that DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #42
I love the parsing Aerows Mar 2015 #44
Interesting how this thread Aerows Mar 2015 #45
They dare not because it is not TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #46
Can you name the last thing Hillary had an opinion on? madville Mar 2015 #48
Wait a second Aerows Mar 2015 #49
Seems like every time Boehner screws up madville Mar 2015 #50
That remains to be seen, madville Aerows Mar 2015 #51
You need a lesson in basic Civics. LOL. Beausoir Mar 2015 #52
it's not treason as we're not at war with Israel Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #53
not at war with Israel, BUT DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bibi's speech: None dare ...»Reply #5