Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should the US have tried to capture and interrogate Bin Laden? [View all]hack89
(39,179 posts)24. In an age of suicide bombers I am not sure "unarmed" still means what it use to do.
is it unreasonable to think that he was still dangerous even if his hands were empty? If you were one of those SEALs, would you be willing to take that chance?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Should the US have tried to capture and interrogate Bin Laden? [View all]
Prometheus Bound
May 2012
OP
That was my thinking, too. No American traveling abroad, anywhere, would have been safe. n/t
Ian David
May 2012
#21
The fact that he was killed while unarmed lends some credence to the premise.
Prometheus Bound
May 2012
#12
In an age of suicide bombers I am not sure "unarmed" still means what it use to do.
hack89
May 2012
#24
That's complete nonsense. All they had to do was grab him instead of shooting him.
leveymg
May 2012
#18
Capturing OBL from mommy's basement is easy ... doing it in Pakistan is a little harder.
JoePhilly
May 2012
#23
Obviously it is easier and more expedient. And just as obviously you haven't thought this through
Egalitarian Thug
May 2012
#38