Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
5. I agree.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 02:03 PM
Mar 2015

The death of a man is the important part of the story. So why is it necessary to increase the visceral revulsion about this event by mischaracterizing it in such a way? Is it not enough to say an officer lost his life in a shootout in the early morning hours? Why must we throw in deceptive terms to make it an even greater tragedy?

I feel sorrow for the loss of live. I feel disappointment at the blatant manipulation of normal human feelings by the statements of the department categorizing the loss of life. I dislike having people try and manipulate me.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Definition of the day. Ambush. [View all] Savannahmann Mar 2015 OP
That's propaganda for you. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #1
Whatever Oklahoma_Liberal Mar 2015 #2
Quick question. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #3
People saying "I could care less" and "chaise lounge" is also irritating. Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #4
I agree. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Definition of the day. Am...»Reply #5