Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Clinton’s E-mail Mess Shows WE NEED A PRIMARY, Not a Coronation [View all]

I am not going to pretend to know enough about National Archives and Records Administration regulations to have a worthwhile opinion about whether Hillary Clinton violated them by relying on a private e-mail address while secretary of state. (Most of the people talking about it on cable TV, or writing their own hot takes, probably dont either.) Right now, it looks like Clinton went out of her way to keep her correspondence secret when it was supposed to be public. But its also true that a lot of Clinton scandals turn out, upon closer inspection, to be bullshit. (See, for example, Benghazi, or Whitewater.) Worse, they tend to be bullshit that serves as a pretext for more bullshit, as each new uproar is said to feed into the narrative set in motion by the previous ones.
Yet at a certain point it stops mattering whether coverage of Clinton is as unfair as her defenders say it is. If shes going to be the Democratic candidate, part of her job is not to leave herself open to this sort of thing. If she wasnt actively skirting the law by not using a State Department e-mail address, she was being sloppy. By not keeping her official e-mails separate from her private ones, she gives Republicans a pretext to subpoena them all. At the very least, theres going to be a drawn-out fight over access to them. Should she be forced to turn them over, her genuinely private e-mails as well as her public ones will be used against her. Imagine what Republicans would be able to do with a trove of private correspondence that Clinton never thought theyd get to see.
The whole mess underscores the immense danger for the Democrats of holding a coronation rather than a primary. Even if the front-runner were as low-drama as Obama, the party, the country and even the candidate would benefit from a genuine debate about everything from foreign policy to the financial industry. And Clinton is not low-drama. She and her husband live at the center of a constantly unfolding political soap opera with endlessly proliferating subplots. Even if theyre not always treated fairly, they also seem to pathologically court trouble. See, for example, recent stories about foreign governments making donations to the Clinton Foundation during Clintons State Department tenure. One of those, The Washington Post reported, violated [the foundations] ethics agreement with the Obama administration.
Maybe theres nothing more there, or anywhere, waiting to come out. But without other credible Democrats building the infrastructures theyd need to run, theres no plan B if something explodes. Democrats are betting the future of the country on the Clintons ability to avoid crippling scandal. Maybe that wager will ultimately make sense, but theres no reason to go all in so soon.
cont'
http://www.thenation.com/blog/200169/clintons-e-mail-mess-shows-we-need-primary-not-coronation
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hell no. And nobody implied that. But who else is running? Answer me that. n/t
slumcamper
Mar 2015
#18
No one is running, not even Hillary. Her being coy and waiting like this is another
Autumn
Mar 2015
#38
And that's the problem - this shit's NEVA goin away, all because of Hillary's profound lack of judgment.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#14
O'Malley has been trying to run for a while now but more want to rant about how we need a primary
JI7
Mar 2015
#6
Has Elizabeth Warren? No, she hasn't. And yet many DU'ers have a bumper sticker in their signatures
KittyWampus
Mar 2015
#48
Though Sanders I think has a committee looking into the feasibility, Warren has explicitly said
still_one
Mar 2015
#52
She doesn't have a lot of scandals. She has a lot of smears from republicans. BENGHAZI!
KittyWampus
Mar 2015
#49
If she has a medical or some devastating political event that causes her NOT to run...
Liberal Lantern
Mar 2015
#12
If Hillary bows out, which is startin to look like a real possibility, Elizabeth WILL run. Guaranteed.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2015
#16
I was also given a strong hint this would be the case from someone who works with her...
cascadiance
Mar 2015
#69
Wow. Even the Fox legal experts (former US Attorneys) said there's nothing to this
rpannier
Mar 2015
#28
And if I may jump in on your post to point out that even that primary only includes
silvershadow
Mar 2015
#29
No it doesn't, 99.9% of people who have a comercial ISP model has an email server in their
uponit7771
Mar 2015
#35
I think the post is right about its lack of knowledge, and therefore about its worth.
Orsino
Mar 2015
#36
Nothing ever happens to republicans. Their party and the media make sure of that
Autumn
Mar 2015
#47
If you don't want a "Coronation", identify, promote and fund other candidates...
Blue_Tires
Mar 2015
#46