Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bibi's speech: None dare call it treason [View all]Aerows
(39,961 posts)49. Wait a second
Why is this about Hillary?
Oh wait, it has nothing to do with Hillary. It's a deflection from the Boehner-Netanyahu fuck up.
Which I assure you will not be forgotten anytime soon.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Protocol requires that he notify the WH. He did not. And neither did the Israeli Ambassador, who
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#54
I'm talking about a law to 'inform'. That is what should have happened, but it didn't. They violated
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#59
They have NEVER addressed Congress without arranging it with POTUS, and NEVER addressed Congress
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#16
oh come on. You want to criticize Hillary that do it on substance. The IWR or patriot act, or
still_one
Mar 2015
#5
You are correct she is under no obligation to comment. However, if and when she plans to run for
still_one
Mar 2015
#12
Making policies they oppose harder to implement is still not treason. Seriously, buy a dictionary.
Bucky
Mar 2015
#20
One of the most incomprehensible, babbling OPs in DU history, which is saying something.
hugo_from_TN
Mar 2015
#36