General Discussion

Aerows

(39,961 posts)

51. That remains to be seen, madville

Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:58 PM

Mar 2015

but given the attitudes of people around me, the entire situation has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton, and everything to do with Israel attempting to usurp our President's leadership with Netanyahu's speech that was arranged against protocol with Boehner.

We can drag clowns, jugglers and astounding feats of distraction into this whole situation, but it doesn't change the problem at the fundamental element.

We might not all like him as our President, but President Obama is our President, and some other head of state isn't welcome to come into our country and kick him.

Fuck that. We elected him. We didn't choose some asshole that wants to drag our country, our citizens and our people into a war because Israel wants to be the bantam rooster ruling the yard. Sorry, chicken, we aren't sending our American men and women to die just because Israel screams:

"Hey, Let's you and him fight".

Fuck that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bibi's speech: None dare call it treason [View all] DonCoquixote Mar 2015 OP

If by "rarely" you mean "frequently," brendan120678 Mar 2015 #1

I'm not sure that enlightenment Mar 2015 #7

How did Boehner do an end run around the Constitution? SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #23

Boehner's an ass. It's like slapping your mother in the face. elias49 Mar 2015 #28

Actually, enlightenment Mar 2015 #32

Actually, in the link you provided SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #33

Your interpretation. enlightenment Mar 2015 #35

Not much to interpret, he says it's not a violation SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #38

You don't have to break the law Aerows Mar 2015 #47

I agree 100% SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #57

Well at least Aerows Mar 2015 #60

Protocol requires that he notify the WH. He did not. And neither did the Israeli Ambassador, who sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #54

Good luck getting Congress SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #58

I'm talking about a law to 'inform'. That is what should have happened, but it didn't. They violated sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #59

They have NEVER addressed Congress without arranging it with POTUS, and NEVER addressed Congress pnwmom Mar 2015 #16

It's not treason Aerows Mar 2015 #56

It's not treason sharp_stick Mar 2015 #2

It's "treachery" common for Boehner, a new level for Israeli leaders HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #4

thank you Bucky Mar 2015 #19

Couldn't agree more SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #25

Yup. Agschmid Mar 2015 #34

Yep. Aerows Mar 2015 #55

It is in fact fairly common. I am not sure where you get your info from. Mass Mar 2015 #3

oh come on. You want to criticize Hillary that do it on substance. The IWR or patriot act, or still_one Mar 2015 #5

why should Hillary comment at all? misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #9

You are correct she is under no obligation to comment. However, if and when she plans to run for still_one Mar 2015 #12

I expect thats precisely how she sees it. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #13

yup. No argument from me still_one Mar 2015 #14

Madeleine Albright has no dog in this fight, but she spoke up. PADemD Mar 2015 #22

Good for her. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #27

If she wants our votes in a presidential election she owes it to us tularetom Mar 2015 #31

He started it with mythology and ended it with mythology. nt arthritisR_US Mar 2015 #6

some dare call everything treason Enrique Mar 2015 #8

bibi's speech achsadu Mar 2015 #10

"he was treated like a hero (that he is not)" EX500rider Mar 2015 #26

Oh groan..are you serious? elias49 Mar 2015 #29

Dem Reps on C-SPAN2 Duppers Mar 2015 #11

So Pelosi has just come out and dissed it. Others will follow still_one Mar 2015 #15

IT'S NOT TREASON leftynyc Mar 2015 #17

here is why it is treason DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #18

Making policies they oppose harder to implement is still not treason. Seriously, buy a dictionary. Bucky Mar 2015 #20

OH I do know what the word means DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #24

I think that ship already sailed. nt elias49 Mar 2015 #30

Here is why it's not. onenote Mar 2015 #21

Very well done leftynyc Mar 2015 #37

You know Aerows Mar 2015 #43

100% agreement on that leftynyc Mar 2015 #61

Treason? Aerows Mar 2015 #41

One of the most incomprehensible, babbling OPs in DU history, which is saying something. hugo_from_TN Mar 2015 #36

So you do not actually have a response DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #39

Bibi Aerows Mar 2015 #40

add to that DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #42

I love the parsing Aerows Mar 2015 #44

Interesting how this thread Aerows Mar 2015 #45

They dare not because it is not TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #46

Can you name the last thing Hillary had an opinion on? madville Mar 2015 #48

Wait a second Aerows Mar 2015 #49

Seems like every time Boehner screws up madville Mar 2015 #50

That remains to be seen, madville Aerows Mar 2015 #51

You need a lesson in basic Civics. LOL. Beausoir Mar 2015 #52

it's not treason as we're not at war with Israel Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #53

not at war with Israel, BUT DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #62