Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bibi's speech: None dare call it treason [View all]Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)53. it's not treason as we're not at war with Israel
It does fall squarely under the definition of "sedition", however, and it could possibly be argued that the speech constituted an act of war.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Protocol requires that he notify the WH. He did not. And neither did the Israeli Ambassador, who
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#54
I'm talking about a law to 'inform'. That is what should have happened, but it didn't. They violated
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#59
They have NEVER addressed Congress without arranging it with POTUS, and NEVER addressed Congress
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#16
oh come on. You want to criticize Hillary that do it on substance. The IWR or patriot act, or
still_one
Mar 2015
#5
You are correct she is under no obligation to comment. However, if and when she plans to run for
still_one
Mar 2015
#12
Making policies they oppose harder to implement is still not treason. Seriously, buy a dictionary.
Bucky
Mar 2015
#20
One of the most incomprehensible, babbling OPs in DU history, which is saying something.
hugo_from_TN
Mar 2015
#36