Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheNutcracker

(2,104 posts)

6. We don't have MEDICARE in certain states as a fed law that states don't like.

Reply to former9thward (Reply #3)

Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:14 PM

Mar 2015

By what you say, count on states to begin dismantling it.

I disagree with you.

And as Kagen said, we don't decide cases based on FOUR words out of context. That makes any words meaningless.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dear SCOTUS: Health reforms intended for all under constitution [View all] TheNutcracker Mar 2015 OP

Kick to MSM....we need a real discussion... TheNutcracker Mar 2015 #1

This "State" business made me scratch my head as well when I read those six words. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #2

No place in the Constitution is word "state" former9thward Mar 2015 #3

We don't have MEDICARE in certain states as a fed law that states don't like. TheNutcracker Mar 2015 #6

Don't understand your comment about Medicare. former9thward Mar 2015 #8

. Takket Mar 2015 #4

Federal law is supreme but limited to the powers in the Constitution. WDIM Mar 2015 #5

Again, based on your assumption say goodbye to Medicare! TheNutcracker Mar 2015 #7