Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. Plus a million!
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:46 PM
Mar 2015


Don Segretti 4.0, A Teabagger Nation

By Driftglass - **June 21, 2010**

'Ratfucking' is a method the GOP began during the Nixon era and consistently after that time. Since they have the money to fund pundits to do this for them, it will continue. Beware.

The practice has won the right many victories for them and very effective in causing Democrats to abandon their candidates and their party. The man who originated the term and method was:

Donald Henry Segretti (born September 17, 1941, in San Marino, California) is a former political operative for the Committee to Re-elect the President (Nixon) during the early 1970s. Segretti was hired by friend Dwight L. Chapin to run a campaign of dirty tricks (which he dubbed "ratfucking"[1]) against the Democrats, with his work being paid for by Herb Kalmbach, Nixon's lawyer, from presidential campaign re-election funds gathered before an April 7, 1972, law required that contributors be identified. His actions were part of the larger Watergate scandal, and were important indicators for the few members of the press actively investigating the Watergate break in in the earliest stages that what became known as the Watergate scandal involved far more than just a simple break in. Segretti's involvement in the "Canuck letter"[2] typifies the tactics Segretti and others working with him used, forging a letter ascribed to Senator Edmund Muskie which maligned the people, language and culture of French Canada and French Canadians, causing the soon to be Democratic presidential candidate Muskie considerable headaches in denying the letter and having to continue dealing with the issue. Many historians have indicated over the years that Muskie's withdrawal from the Presidential primaries, and the disastrous Iowa primary loss to George McGovern that precipitated it, were at least partly the result of Segretti and some of the other "Ratfuckers" creating so much confusion and false accusations that Muskie simply could not respond in any meaningful way.

In 1974, Segretti pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts of distributing illegal (in fact, forged) campaign literature and was sentenced to six months in prison, actually serving four months. One notable example of his wrongdoing was a faked letter on Democratic presidential candidate Edmund Muskie's letterhead falsely alleging that U.S. Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a fellow Democrat, had had an illegitimate child with a 17-year-old; the Muskie letters accused Senator Hubert H. Humphrey of sexual misconduct as well.[3] After testimony regarding the Muskie letters emerged, Democrats in Florida noted the similarity between these sabotage incidents and others that involved stationery stolen from Humphrey's offices after Muskie dropped out of the race. A false news release on Humphrey's letterhead "accused Rep. Shirley Chisholm (D-N.Y.) of being mentally unbalanced" and a mailing with an unidentified source mischaracterized Humphrey as supporting a controversial environmental measure that he actually opposed.[3]

In the 1976 film about Watergate, All the President's Men, Segretti was played by Robert Walden.

Segretti was a lawyer who served as a prosecutor for the military and later as a civilian. However, his license was suspended for two years following his conviction. In 1995, he ran for a local judgeship in Orange County, California. However, he quickly withdrew from the race when his campaign awakened lingering anger over his involvement in the Watergate scandal. In 2000, Segretti served as co-chair of John McCain's presidential campaign in Orange County.[4]

He holds a B.S. in Finance from the University of Southern California (1963) and a J.D. from UC Berkeley School of Law (1966). While at USC he became associated with Dwight L. Chapin, Tim Elbourne, Ron Ziegler, Herbert Porter and Gordon C. Strachan, they all joined the "Trojans for Representative Government" group.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Segretti



Back in the Nixon era

It would be tempting to label this "The Return of the Ratfuckers", but of course the GOP Ratfuck squad (from Corrente) --

Ratfucking is an American slang term for political sabotage or dirty tricks. It was first brought to public attention during the Watergate scandal investigation that during the 1972 presidential campaign the Nixon campaign committee maintained a "dirty tricks" unit focused on discrediting Nixon's strongest challengers.

According to Woodward and Bernstein, Nixon aide Dwight Chapin hired fellow USC alumnus Donald Segretti to run a campaign of dirty tricks (which Segretti dubbed "ratfucking&quot against the Democrats in 1972. The purpose of the operation was to create as much bitterness and disunity within the Democrat primary as possible. One notable example of Segretti's wrong-doing was a faked letter on Democratic presidential candidate Edmund Muskie's letterhead falsely alleging that U.S. Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a fellow Democrat, had had an illegitimate child with a 17-year-old...

-- has never left us.


Much more worth reading at:

http://driftglass.blogspot.com/2010/06/don-segretti-40-teabagger-nation.html

This is why we see one thing after another against Obama, Kerry, Pelosi and other Democrats to gin up outrage. Now we can add the Clintons to the list again. The major cable news pundits made their careers on them.

While some things are based on difference of opinion, tearing up Democrats and our leaders is not productive. Many of the issues have been manufactured about the things guaranteed break the hearts of liberal, progressive Democrats, usually by Libertarians who do not want the same things as we do. But they want to destroy Democrats because they are the force that robs their corporatist masters.

So what happens is Democrats feel betrayed and react accordingly, but are not given opposing information fast enough to debunk and restore them.

As soon as one issue has been debunked, they move immediately to another. It is exhausting to rebutt all of these, and after a while by repetition they are established as a truth by the inability to not rebutt them at the speed they are being sent out.

Ratfucking also relies upon the learned perception that the well of political discourse has been turned into a cesspool, and counts on the discouraged to lose the will to get into government to clean the mess up which fulfills its purpose.

Instead, in their place are the Tea Party grifters who become the voices of power, instead of the compassionate who stay out of political life. Thus the RW mission is accomplished.

Another major reason some smears are not rebutted is we don't have Koch billions to fund these smears, so they out vote us with their media dollars and paid pundits. We musr be smart and patient with our movement to not allow them to divide us.

Anyone who followed the political scene for many years would recognize the approach being used with or without using the word 'ratfucking.'

But the term is shorthand for a complicated process. Its purpose is to destroy the reputation or credibility of the Democratic Party and Obama (and now HRC) among those who should be rightly proud of our accomplishments and values. The media is owned by RW billionaires and they do not show our side in a credible fashion.

Make no mistake, it is not just the personality or the actions of our party or our president being attacked, it is the progressive ideas we represent. Those ideas are the enemy the RWers and Koch organizations are fighting by going after our leaders. They will use Citizens United and every other weapon in their hands to defeat us and our hopes for a better America and a better world.

Think of the method employed to ruin the Kennedys, ACORN and so many others. We must not be taken in.

**Yes, some of us realized what was happening as the media and pundits that were formerly trusted, did this in the summer of 2010, and it worked very well. We tried to warn others, but they stayed away from the polls and many states now live under the boot of the Tea Party. Now they live under the boot of Secessionists determined to impose a fascist theocracy on them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll help Hillary fans out. Find out what email system Leon Panetta, Robert Gates, TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #1
I guess the National Archivist doesn't count? He says she's fine. And he should know. nt Hekate Mar 2015 #18
No. Being technically legal doesn't explain what she did. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #19
So you're sure she must have done *something* wrong, and any moment now the nonbiased MSM... Hekate Mar 2015 #24
I added stuff to my above post on edit that explains why I think this is trouble TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #28
I don't know if you did anything wrong, either. That is the nature of witch hunts. I look forward... Hekate Mar 2015 #29
I find it strange that insistence on public servants following good practices and protocols-- TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #34
Have you read the OP and Post#9? That is what is going on. That is what I am objecting to... Hekate Mar 2015 #35
I don't know, it seems that the Clintons really love to shoot themselves in TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #37
So it's their fault. Hekate Mar 2015 #39
Yes. It is. And the President's. Why the WH looked the other way TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #41
what makes me angry is using private email systems for public business and then trying to ND-Dem Mar 2015 #48
Too similar to typical RW talking points for my taste. riqster Mar 2015 #98
Hiding and/or deleting emails and thwarting transparency in government TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #101
Bollocks. riqster Mar 2015 #102
The ones she gave to the State Dept.? What ones DIDN'T she give to the State Dept? TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #105
Classic. riqster Mar 2015 #106
The wrongness of the situation is quite clear Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #54
You make points that have been debunked. Among others the National Archivist has cleared her. Hekate Mar 2015 #60
Nobody can "clear" what she did. It's already been done. She sequestered all her TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #72
Hey.. Don't vote for her. Your problem is solved. Adrahil Mar 2015 #85
No. My problem is not solved. zentrum Mar 2015 #92
Truth! GHWBush thought he had 4 more years..that his re-election.. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #2
We can also thank Ross Perot for aiding Clinton's ascendancy. George II Mar 2015 #33
Very true riqster Mar 2015 #79
Actually, the scandal should be that she botched the security. jeff47 Mar 2015 #3
..and somewhere in this scandal there MUST be a hook to.. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #6
Yeah, it's not like she had an important job jeff47 Mar 2015 #55
Or read the Emails of a crappy US gov server either. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #62
Well, we know her server was using the factory default encryption keys jeff47 Mar 2015 #63
Ummm..jeff47 I have no post about what you are speaking of. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #65
You made a claim. I'm asking you to back it up. jeff47 Mar 2015 #66
Good Lord jeff47. My posts was a statement as to the GOP misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #68
Yeah, the title field is like totally not part of a post. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2015 #69
Okay jeff47. Bye misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #70
Yeah, me reading what you actually wrote is me totally missing your point. jeff47 Mar 2015 #91
When did lightweight encryption protocols become violations? riqster Mar 2015 #99
Both articles now discredited. leftofcool Mar 2015 #7
Which is why you supplied a link showing they actually changed encryption keys. jeff47 Mar 2015 #53
What "scandal"? George II Mar 2015 #96
That the SoS set up an email system that allows anyone to read her email. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2015 #97
There's something else for people to think about re. Clinton Derangement Syndrome BeyondGeography Mar 2015 #4
+1 Clinton fatigue before the campaign even begins Dems to Win Mar 2015 #11
I'm feeling like Alan Arkin in Little Miss Sunshine BeyondGeography Mar 2015 #14
All of that relates to emotion instead of legality. riqster Mar 2015 #89
Email gate, or whatever it's called, is a joke BeyondGeography Mar 2015 #90
That seems backwards to me. riqster Mar 2015 #100
Thank you for this post. leftofcool Mar 2015 #5
as the song says, 'it's only just begun' spanone Mar 2015 #8
Plus a million! freshwest Mar 2015 #9
This should be pinned to the top of DU's masthead. It should be required reading here. Hekate Mar 2015 #31
Or to be more genteel in speech, we're dealing with Dirty Tricks from Tricky Dick's gangsters. freshwest Mar 2015 #71
RF -- the only thing that needs to be said about this email nonsense. betsuni Mar 2015 #40
Must explain or the post gets hidden. A DUer had one hidden as the jurors didn't know the meaning. freshwest Mar 2015 #57
Thank you -- after posting took a nap and just came back and saw this. betsuni Mar 2015 #73
Agree with freshwest--but anyone who alerts on this, after the term is explained, deserves a MADem Mar 2015 #67
Thanks! betsuni Mar 2015 #74
I've seen it happen all too often here. MADem Mar 2015 #75
I forgot where I was for a moment! betsuni Mar 2015 #76
Please make this an OP. riqster Mar 2015 #80
I see your "Plus a million!" chervilant Mar 2015 #94
Seriously. I have no plans on voting for her and I think this whole email Katashi_itto Mar 2015 #10
This. riqster Mar 2015 #81
Pretty good Katashi_itto Mar 2015 #84
Then you got the male version of Palin - Scott Walker Iliyah Mar 2015 #12
Interesting that the morning after Bibi's speech tavernier Mar 2015 #13
Boehner used bibi to hide the DHS collapse. JoePhilly Mar 2015 #15
Former Dem chairman Harpootlian claims she'll die by 1000 cuts. ErikJ Mar 2015 #16
Biden's going nowhere, though. No one takes him seriously anymore. TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #21
Harp was on Bloomberg today. Said Dem party has a lot of good alternative candidates ErikJ Mar 2015 #36
Biden huh? Good luck with that. n/t Adrahil Mar 2015 #86
thank you barbtries Mar 2015 #17
Nobody cares what BelligerentandStupid "the radical centrist" has to say? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #20
+1. nt OnyxCollie Mar 2015 #93
Blunt and Cranky "used to think we couldn’t get any dumber than we were in the Lewinsky era" >SIGH< Hekate Mar 2015 #22
Did anyone at the AP think to do a whois search? Bob Cesca did, and the Daily Banter has it genwah Mar 2015 #23
Thanks for posting that, good article! betsuni Mar 2015 #42
No prob. Pass the link along, I don't tweet or stuff. genwah Mar 2015 #43
I don't tweet either, but I posted it on another forum, at least. betsuni Mar 2015 #77
Um....those folks claim to debunk the story by "common sense". jeff47 Mar 2015 #59
This e-mail issue is nothing! Joe Johns Mar 2015 #25
That made me laugh. Well played, sir. greatlaurel Mar 2015 #27
And she engaged in premarital matriculation! riqster Mar 2015 #83
Outstanding rant. greatlaurel Mar 2015 #26
I agree, mostly…Except... Demoiselle Mar 2015 #30
I agree, mostly…Except... Demoiselle Mar 2015 #32
Fair points all. riqster Mar 2015 #82
''We have become even dumber than we were in the 90’s.'' DeSwiss Mar 2015 #38
Kick & recommended. William769 Mar 2015 #44
Benghazi! B Calm Mar 2015 #45
follow the money quadrature Mar 2015 #46
A LOT of people showed their hands in breathlessly reporting on this story... MADem Mar 2015 #47
It is not personal for most, it is all about ratings and nothing else. This drives ratings krawhitham Mar 2015 #51
The public coverage is all about ratings, certainly.... MADem Mar 2015 #52
No rules were violated? They might want to recheck that krawhitham Mar 2015 #49
Oh please. The boss can ignore a "warning" written by another "boss." MADem Mar 2015 #61
A policy isn't a rule. Adrahil Mar 2015 #87
Indeed. Policies are often cited when budgets don't allow for rule. riqster Mar 2015 #107
whitewater has morphed into benghazi. GOP tourrettes. pansypoo53219 Mar 2015 #50
but what about Hill's Benghazi emails? Botany Mar 2015 #56
Haaa..Apparently so. Good point. nt misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #64
Word. kestrel91316 Mar 2015 #58
No. After the 90s, some of us learned not to vote for the Clintons. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #78
Vote for the candidate of you choice in the primaries... Adrahil Mar 2015 #88
Amen. WRGAS at this point. riqster Mar 2015 #95
"Vote Hillary in 2016 - technically she did nothing illegal!" tularetom Mar 2015 #103
Remove the fifth word. riqster Mar 2015 #104
"Vote Hillary" is fine. Yours sounds like a Lee Atwater creation. great white snark Mar 2015 #108
So if SoS Mitt Romney does the same it is not an issue? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #109
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yet Another Bulls*** Clin...»Reply #9