Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yet Another Bulls*** Clinton “Story”. We have become even dumber than we were in the 90’s. [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)9. Plus a million!

Don Segretti 4.0, A Teabagger Nation
By Driftglass - **June 21, 2010**
'Ratfucking' is a method the GOP began during the Nixon era and consistently after that time. Since they have the money to fund pundits to do this for them, it will continue. Beware.
The practice has won the right many victories for them and very effective in causing Democrats to abandon their candidates and their party. The man who originated the term and method was:
Donald Henry Segretti (born September 17, 1941, in San Marino, California) is a former political operative for the Committee to Re-elect the President (Nixon) during the early 1970s. Segretti was hired by friend Dwight L. Chapin to run a campaign of dirty tricks (which he dubbed "ratfucking"[1]) against the Democrats, with his work being paid for by Herb Kalmbach, Nixon's lawyer, from presidential campaign re-election funds gathered before an April 7, 1972, law required that contributors be identified. His actions were part of the larger Watergate scandal, and were important indicators for the few members of the press actively investigating the Watergate break in in the earliest stages that what became known as the Watergate scandal involved far more than just a simple break in. Segretti's involvement in the "Canuck letter"[2] typifies the tactics Segretti and others working with him used, forging a letter ascribed to Senator Edmund Muskie which maligned the people, language and culture of French Canada and French Canadians, causing the soon to be Democratic presidential candidate Muskie considerable headaches in denying the letter and having to continue dealing with the issue. Many historians have indicated over the years that Muskie's withdrawal from the Presidential primaries, and the disastrous Iowa primary loss to George McGovern that precipitated it, were at least partly the result of Segretti and some of the other "Ratfuckers" creating so much confusion and false accusations that Muskie simply could not respond in any meaningful way.
In 1974, Segretti pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts of distributing illegal (in fact, forged) campaign literature and was sentenced to six months in prison, actually serving four months. One notable example of his wrongdoing was a faked letter on Democratic presidential candidate Edmund Muskie's letterhead falsely alleging that U.S. Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a fellow Democrat, had had an illegitimate child with a 17-year-old; the Muskie letters accused Senator Hubert H. Humphrey of sexual misconduct as well.[3] After testimony regarding the Muskie letters emerged, Democrats in Florida noted the similarity between these sabotage incidents and others that involved stationery stolen from Humphrey's offices after Muskie dropped out of the race. A false news release on Humphrey's letterhead "accused Rep. Shirley Chisholm (D-N.Y.) of being mentally unbalanced" and a mailing with an unidentified source mischaracterized Humphrey as supporting a controversial environmental measure that he actually opposed.[3]
In the 1976 film about Watergate, All the President's Men, Segretti was played by Robert Walden.
Segretti was a lawyer who served as a prosecutor for the military and later as a civilian. However, his license was suspended for two years following his conviction. In 1995, he ran for a local judgeship in Orange County, California. However, he quickly withdrew from the race when his campaign awakened lingering anger over his involvement in the Watergate scandal. In 2000, Segretti served as co-chair of John McCain's presidential campaign in Orange County.[4]
He holds a B.S. in Finance from the University of Southern California (1963) and a J.D. from UC Berkeley School of Law (1966). While at USC he became associated with Dwight L. Chapin, Tim Elbourne, Ron Ziegler, Herbert Porter and Gordon C. Strachan, they all joined the "Trojans for Representative Government" group.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Segretti

Back in the Nixon era
It would be tempting to label this "The Return of the Ratfuckers", but of course the GOP Ratfuck squad (from Corrente) --
Ratfucking is an American slang term for political sabotage or dirty tricks. It was first brought to public attention during the Watergate scandal investigation that during the 1972 presidential campaign the Nixon campaign committee maintained a "dirty tricks" unit focused on discrediting Nixon's strongest challengers.
According to Woodward and Bernstein, Nixon aide Dwight Chapin hired fellow USC alumnus Donald Segretti to run a campaign of dirty tricks (which Segretti dubbed "ratfucking"
-- has never left us.
Much more worth reading at:
http://driftglass.blogspot.com/2010/06/don-segretti-40-teabagger-nation.html
This is why we see one thing after another against Obama, Kerry, Pelosi and other Democrats to gin up outrage. Now we can add the Clintons to the list again. The major cable news pundits made their careers on them.
While some things are based on difference of opinion, tearing up Democrats and our leaders is not productive. Many of the issues have been manufactured about the things guaranteed break the hearts of liberal, progressive Democrats, usually by Libertarians who do not want the same things as we do. But they want to destroy Democrats because they are the force that robs their corporatist masters.
So what happens is Democrats feel betrayed and react accordingly, but are not given opposing information fast enough to debunk and restore them.
As soon as one issue has been debunked, they move immediately to another. It is exhausting to rebutt all of these, and after a while by repetition they are established as a truth by the inability to not rebutt them at the speed they are being sent out.
Ratfucking also relies upon the learned perception that the well of political discourse has been turned into a cesspool, and counts on the discouraged to lose the will to get into government to clean the mess up which fulfills its purpose.
Instead, in their place are the Tea Party grifters who become the voices of power, instead of the compassionate who stay out of political life. Thus the RW mission is accomplished.
Another major reason some smears are not rebutted is we don't have Koch billions to fund these smears, so they out vote us with their media dollars and paid pundits. We musr be smart and patient with our movement to not allow them to divide us.
Anyone who followed the political scene for many years would recognize the approach being used with or without using the word 'ratfucking.'
But the term is shorthand for a complicated process. Its purpose is to destroy the reputation or credibility of the Democratic Party and Obama (and now HRC) among those who should be rightly proud of our accomplishments and values. The media is owned by RW billionaires and they do not show our side in a credible fashion.
Make no mistake, it is not just the personality or the actions of our party or our president being attacked, it is the progressive ideas we represent. Those ideas are the enemy the RWers and Koch organizations are fighting by going after our leaders. They will use Citizens United and every other weapon in their hands to defeat us and our hopes for a better America and a better world.
Think of the method employed to ruin the Kennedys, ACORN and so many others. We must not be taken in.
**Yes, some of us realized what was happening as the media and pundits that were formerly trusted, did this in the summer of 2010, and it worked very well. We tried to warn others, but they stayed away from the polls and many states now live under the boot of the Tea Party. Now they live under the boot of Secessionists determined to impose a fascist theocracy on them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yet Another Bulls*** Clinton “Story”. We have become even dumber than we were in the 90’s. [View all]
riqster
Mar 2015
OP
I'll help Hillary fans out. Find out what email system Leon Panetta, Robert Gates,
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#1
I guess the National Archivist doesn't count? He says she's fine. And he should know. nt
Hekate
Mar 2015
#18
So you're sure she must have done *something* wrong, and any moment now the nonbiased MSM...
Hekate
Mar 2015
#24
I added stuff to my above post on edit that explains why I think this is trouble
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#28
I don't know if you did anything wrong, either. That is the nature of witch hunts. I look forward...
Hekate
Mar 2015
#29
I find it strange that insistence on public servants following good practices and protocols--
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#34
Have you read the OP and Post#9? That is what is going on. That is what I am objecting to...
Hekate
Mar 2015
#35
I don't know, it seems that the Clintons really love to shoot themselves in
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#37
what makes me angry is using private email systems for public business and then trying to
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#48
Hiding and/or deleting emails and thwarting transparency in government
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#101
The ones she gave to the State Dept.? What ones DIDN'T she give to the State Dept?
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#105
You make points that have been debunked. Among others the National Archivist has cleared her.
Hekate
Mar 2015
#60
Nobody can "clear" what she did. It's already been done. She sequestered all her
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#72
There's something else for people to think about re. Clinton Derangement Syndrome
BeyondGeography
Mar 2015
#4
This should be pinned to the top of DU's masthead. It should be required reading here.
Hekate
Mar 2015
#31
Or to be more genteel in speech, we're dealing with Dirty Tricks from Tricky Dick's gangsters.
freshwest
Mar 2015
#71
Must explain or the post gets hidden. A DUer had one hidden as the jurors didn't know the meaning.
freshwest
Mar 2015
#57
Agree with freshwest--but anyone who alerts on this, after the term is explained, deserves a
MADem
Mar 2015
#67
Harp was on Bloomberg today. Said Dem party has a lot of good alternative candidates
ErikJ
Mar 2015
#36
Nobody cares what BelligerentandStupid "the radical centrist" has to say?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#20
Blunt and Cranky "used to think we couldn’t get any dumber than we were in the Lewinsky era" >SIGH<
Hekate
Mar 2015
#22
Did anyone at the AP think to do a whois search? Bob Cesca did, and the Daily Banter has it
genwah
Mar 2015
#23
It is not personal for most, it is all about ratings and nothing else. This drives ratings
krawhitham
Mar 2015
#51