Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jane Goodall’s Troubling, Error-Filled New Book, ‘Seeds of Hope’ [View all]REP
(21,691 posts)13. That seems to jibe with my untested, wildass theory
Without making too much of an ass of myself, those born in the 30s are more likely to have memories of what the climate used to be like, what is was like without vaccines and have some degree of farm experience - Victory Gardens, family farms, summer work or hearing about the family farm. So global climate change and vaccines: yup. GMOs may get lumped into the Roundup Ready shenanigans, which is harmful to farmers but not in the "GMOs will make my babies be born nekkid" way.
Just a thought.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Jane Goodall Book Scandal: Most Journalists Hold Back but One Doesn’t Shy Away from Criticizing
HuckleB
Mar 2015
#1
And another 2 yr old article. I am wondering what happened when they pulled the books, if
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#17
Their legacy, well at least in the gentleman's case, does demonstrate how anyone can
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#6
AAAS Scientists: Consensus on GMO Safety Firmer Than For Human-Induced Climate Change
HuckleB
Mar 2015
#41
No. You found two people who don't appreciate plagiarism. I suspect you already
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#34
Link is nearly 2 years old, why post it now? Here's a newer article, seems to imply they pulled the
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#16
I did post a recent link about her book. Or do you mean the anti-GMO stance? I think that's current
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#21
I was just asking why you posted a 2 yr old story about her, and added in a newer one on her book.
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#23
Why does a post on her old position, which she is repeating, get so many likes at DU?
HuckleB
Mar 2015
#24
I have come around on the GMO issue over the last couple years. It appalled me, then I read more and
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#25
And after taking a look at that other thread, I understand this one better.
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#28
Why is it OK for Monsanto to profit from GMOs, but not organic food stores for labeling?
immoderate
Mar 2015
#32