Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A challenge to all GMO supporters. [View all]gcomeau
(5,764 posts)238. I played your game.
Until you refused to answer my question, losing under your own silly rules.
So, I was posting to win your little challenge. I did. Now I'm simply not interested in you trying to start a new one while still refusing to admit you lost the first one.
And Mr. "I'm going to make over half my posts just say basically 'you lose' to everyone who posts in my OP regardless of what they post" calling anyone a rude disruptor is hilarious.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
253 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe this just seems like a really crummy game and people don't want play it. nt
el_bryanto
Mar 2015
#7
I'm glad you enjoyed - fortunately I don't really care so I don't mind losing. nt
el_bryanto
Mar 2015
#20
Pretty much. That our genes are promiscuous in digestion is an odd idea.
Liberal Veteran
Mar 2015
#10
I asked an honest question, admitted as much and even openly declared my laity.
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2015
#17
You want to have a real exploration of the issue - and then call that exploration a game
el_bryanto
Mar 2015
#50
Can you point to a single study in answer to his question? Don't you think it would be a good idea
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#102
To the contrary, there have been multiple studies of epigenetic effects of nutrition.
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#108
The researchers disagree with you. They don't think it's a simple function of fewer calories leading
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#118
I really have zero interest in answering questions with someone who refuses to reciprocate
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#129
Thank you - if you want more info let me know - or tell me it is time to ask my question
SoLeftIAmRight
Mar 2015
#80
Again - Many Thanks - I am going to eat now (GMO corn sad to say) be back soon
SoLeftIAmRight
Mar 2015
#101
I should point out that you are asking another question without having answered the previous one
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#106
Make sure you check out Mike Adam's expose on the mysterious fibers in Chicken McNuggets...
SidDithers
Mar 2015
#220
Coming from the poster who thinks naturalnews is scientifically credible...
SidDithers
Mar 2015
#230
Equating selective breeding with modern genetic engineering is not a valid proposition.
cheapdate
Mar 2015
#233
You ask a good question, since research has shown the epigenetic effects of nutrition.
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#103
What make you think GMO would be any different than any other food in this regard?
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#110
It has been modified -- in different ways, depending on the food. Therefore it is not the same.
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#137
No, I don't think that. In fact, I know it's not true because most corn, for example,
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#160
It means that the millions of people who can't afford more expensive organic foods
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#172
It has been modified before but not genetically modified to withstand large doses of pesticides. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#179
Food was routinely doused in all sorts of pesticides long before GMOs came along
Major Nikon
Mar 2015
#180
Thanks for the link, that makes a lot of sense to me. I am ignorant on this topic.
Rex
Mar 2015
#156
It's why I almost never take the time to engage posters like that anymore...
SidDithers
Mar 2015
#195
you have not answered the question - that makes you a loser in this game
SoLeftIAmRight
Mar 2015
#217
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, and go with intellectually lazy...nt
SidDithers
Mar 2015
#231
My touchstone on the subject is Dr. Arpad Pusztai (along with his recommended site, GMwatch.org).
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2015
#221
The funny thing is (yes, I gladly "lose") you imagine you're asking a great question. n/t
Silent3
Mar 2015
#186
Rules of your game are unless we follow your rules you can call us losers? Ironic much? nt
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#244
So we are not only losers but Bud drinkers, Walmart shoppers, & my 17 words wasted your time?
uppityperson
Mar 2015
#250