Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]SunSeeker
(58,327 posts)5. Yup. The NY Times & AP's failure to issue a retraction is outrageous.
The original assertion by AP that a former Secretary of State might have used a fake name for the probably equally incorrect premise that she has been hiding official email on a "homebrew" server in her house has been resolved, but not before AP let the story run for almost 15 hours, creating a new "Hillary Clinton is evil because..." myth. Then AP didn't bother to print a retraction -- it simply edited the piece and hoped we'd all forget.
http://www.zdnet.com/article/emailgate-how-media-mythology-created-hillary-clintons-fake-fake-identity/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]
OKNancy
Mar 2015
OP
So if anyone ever screws something up, that excuses all behavior from that point on?
jeff47
Mar 2015
#19
But Clinton didn't screw anything up--you're buying off on rightwing smears and bullshit.
MADem
Mar 2015
#23
You're saying she "made an error" when there were no regulations in place where she might have
MADem
Mar 2015
#31
Interesting that anything that favors Hillary only gets minimal number of responses,
Beacool
Mar 2015
#8
the only reason there are even that many is that the admins put it on the DU homepage
OKNancy
Mar 2015
#11
That's because the Archivist of the United States has said "This was a bullshit story."
MADem
Mar 2015
#25
I recall that. She knew it then & now. Same thing they didi to Bill Clinton they'll do to her.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#28
No, your point was not clear. I thought you were referencing watchdog agencies, not networks.
MADem
Mar 2015
#37
They will show up as soon they get their new talking points from Free Republic.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#29