Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Daniel Ellsberg:If Petraeus didn't commit felony-neither did Snowden, Manning, Sterling, or Kiriakou [View all]
Published on
Friday, March 06, 2015
byCommon Dreams
Daniel Ellsberg: Petraeus Case Shows Hypocrisy of Whistleblower Crackdown
If Petraeus did not commit a felony, neither did Snowden, Manning, Sterling, or Kiriakou, says leaker of Pentagon Papers
........
On Tuesday, Petraeus pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor charge of "unauthorized removal and retention of classified material." Under the parameters of the plea deal he made with the Justice Department, prosecutors will recommend two years probation and no jail time."
Compare that to the actions of Chelsea Manning, who is serving 35 years for leaking classified information. As Ellsberg noted: "Chelsea Manning had access to SCI every day
where she worked in Iraq. She chose to disclose none of it, nothing higher than Secret".
There is also the case of Jeffrey Sterling, convicted last month of leaking classified information to New York Times journalist James Risen, "having first revealed it to Congress, as I did," Ellsberg continued.
There is also the case of Jeffrey Sterling, convicted last month of leaking classified information to New York Times journalist James Risen, "having first revealed it to Congress, as I did," Ellsberg continued.
Sterling was also convicted under the Espionage Act and will be sentenced later this year. Manning is serving 35 years in prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
Ellsberg says Sterlings "violations of security regulations were in no way more serious than what Petraeus has now admitted to", and that, while its too late to do anything about his conviction, the judge should take the Petraeus plea bargain into account at his sentencing.
"If disclosing the identities of covert agents to an unauthorized person and storing them in several unauthorized locations deserves a charge with a maximum sentence of one year," Ellsberg said, "then Edward Snowden should face not more than that same one count."
"If disclosing the identities of covert agents to an unauthorized person and storing them in several unauthorized locations deserves a charge with a maximum sentence of one year," Ellsberg said, "then Edward Snowden should face not more than that same one count."
"The government had the chance to hold Petreaus out as an example on the same felony Espionage Act charges theyve leveled (unfairly) against every conscientious whistleblower theyve indicted," Timm concludes. "Their answer? Leaking should no longer be a felony. Lets make sure we hold them to that, and not only for CIA Directors."
MORE:
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/03/06/daniel-ellsberg-petraeus-case-shows-hypocrisy-whistleblower-crackdown
198 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Daniel Ellsberg:If Petraeus didn't commit felony-neither did Snowden, Manning, Sterling, or Kiriakou [View all]
kpete
Mar 2015
OP
let's hear the AG on this - oh, yeah, our new one isn't confirmed b/c she's black & female
wordpix
Mar 2015
#189
I guess we'll never know since Snowden likely will live the rest of his life in Russia.
randome
Mar 2015
#4
Well prosecuting more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined might explain it a bit. n/t
cui bono
Mar 2015
#89
Im just stating a fact to you,,, no warrants have been issued for that ass hole.
Cryptoad
Mar 2015
#120
All due respect, but what possible reason would Snowden have to return now to
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#10
Only until this country restores the rule of law. Other nations have gone through periods like this
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#27
Well that's what I'm talking about actually. We do have laws, we have the Constitution of the US
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#32
Thanks for admitting to playing CYA for the good general. It is right there in your post, TY!
Rex
Mar 2015
#131
He gave away top secret documents to a potential spy. That wasn't hard at all.
randome
Mar 2015
#133
Mr. Ellsberg is a thorn in the side of the Conservatives. He is here pointing out
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#8
Abso-fracking-lutely. I said the Conservatives. The persecution of whistle-blowers and
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#18
Oh, please. Why are you so intent to condemn Snowden? Why are you not as outraged about the NSA's
cui bono
Mar 2015
#91
Because, except for the occasional lapse that happens with every law enforcement agency...
randome
Mar 2015
#102
Maybe the whistle-blowers think they will be treated fairly by a Democratic
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#173
That total of 8 proves that statement to be correct, how can you claim it is wrong?
cui bono
Mar 2015
#90
Playing the "black" card? That can go both ways. It's open season on anyone who criticizes Obama.
cui bono
Mar 2015
#168
"For reasons of national security" is a convenient way to cover up crimes and is used to do so.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2015
#17
Are you kidding me? They would have to come in here and criticize one of their heroes!
Rex
Mar 2015
#22
Sorry, but those who have been critical of Snowden, the majority in that group at DU were NOT fans
still_one
Mar 2015
#88
Both Petraeus was a republican, appointed by a republican when he was general in Afghanistan. When
still_one
Mar 2015
#170
I know you didn't, you were referring to Pretraus for that, and my thoughts were simply that he
still_one
Mar 2015
#194
Yeah I fall in that group too and yet I seem to be able to be critical of both men.
Rex
Mar 2015
#119
I'm talking to someone right now in this very thread that seems to know that the good general
Rex
Mar 2015
#135
Petraus mishandled classified, and he left it with someone who shouldn't have had it.
MADem
Mar 2015
#67
Ellsburg has also said Snowden should not return because he would not be treated fairly
cui bono
Mar 2015
#193
Okay, sorry for that. Perhaps you shouldn't refer to his actions as a charade then. n/t
cui bono
Mar 2015
#197
only to someone engaging in hero worship would that appear to be character assassination
uhnope
Mar 2015
#125
I trust Ellsberg knows what he is speaking about over a self described conservative.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#51
It is 2015, in context what does identifying as a conservative Democrat mean?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#71
Ellsberg is so right, as relevant today, actually, MORE. K & R & TY, kpete!
mother earth
Mar 2015
#49
Oh there is some difference though, Manning and Snowden released thousands of classified documents
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#77
I didnt say he didnt do anything, in fact I think he got off far, far to light.
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#83
I only said though there are "some" differences and I already said I believe he got off
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#85
Exactly. Take Scooter Libby for example, he took a bullet for Bush and Bush
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#114
Yes it does! Just look at all the apologists here for the good general that have ignored that
Rex
Mar 2015
#140
This is interesting, now we have admissions Snowden, Manning, Sterling and Kiriakou has committed
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#154