Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
78. My ideal outcome in 2017: Any Democrat. If HRC gets the nod, I will take extreme pleasure...
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 12:40 PM
Mar 2015
In watching this guy's head finally explode. It will show a generation of hate radio was defeated:



When Limbaugh Compared 12-Year Old Chelsea Clinton To A Dog

Bill Clinton had been president-elect for just a few days when, on November 6, 1992, Limbaugh launched one of the nastiest attacks of his career against an innocent target: 12-year old Chelsea Clinton.

Complete video of that day's program does not appear to be available online, but a portion of Limbaugh's attack was aired in a 1995 documentary about Limbaugh by PBS' Frontline. Also, a transcript of the program is posted in the Nexis database.

Limbaugh began the segment by noting that the New York Daily News' David Hinckley published a list of who's entering and leaving the White House. Limbaugh stated: "He says, In: A cute kid in the White House. Out: Cute dog in the White House.' Could -- could we see the cute kid? Let's take a look at -- see who is the cute kid in the White House."

The program then put up a picture of Millie, the Bush family's dog. Limbaugh responded, in mock confusion, "No, no, no, no. That's not the kid." The program then puts up a picture of Chelsea Clinton, with Rush saying, "that's the kid."


Watch a portion of this exchange from Frontline, this part of a series. Rush has had the rest pulled off the net, but this Media Matters article goes into what Rush was always about as well as linking to the NPR videos:



A full-blown racist and misogynst, who said daily HRC's UHC plan would implement Death Panels. A precursor to Sarah Palin and the Tea Party goons who attacked Democrats at Town Hall meetings that dared to suggest the ACA would change health care, and it even has a UHC provision if a state wanted to have it. In states where UHC was not adopted, Medicaid expansion under the ACA acts as UHC for those who qualify for it.

All that hatred, due to Hillary's support of health care reform, the rights of the poor, women and children seems to have been forgotten. This is about attacking those groups, no one should be confused about that.

Limbaugh got voters to put Newt Gingrich in and was the beginning of Tom DeLay's 'permanent Republican majority.' So much evil was spouted by this demagogue and he's still there and will be for a long time, barring the total defeat of his world view by HRC and the rest of the Democrats.

The GOP are forever beholden to him for the victory he gave to them through propaganda. He has no shame and is not dependent upon revenue by advertisers. Dick Armey revealed as he left one of the Koch front groups that they'd been paying Rush. His father funded his network when other networks ran him off for racist rants.

It would be so sweet to see Rush go away. But from what I'm hearing in my area, he's still getting converts. And it's working on a very personal level, his disdain is adopted by people who mistreat their family members because of learned heartlessness and selfishness from this thoroughly evil man.

HRC's victory would not be about her, but more for us who believe in liberal causes and progressive legislation. Yes, she will be seen as polarizing. The right will continue to hate her and ALL Democrats, but are we afraid when they call Obama a 'fringe left-winger'?

Why should we cede the ground to such who want us destroyed as Limbaugh and the Tea Party do, when it's really not about anything HRC has done?

Most of what is said about her is RW misinformation, and they can use it on the left, they just frame it differently to cause us to fight amongst ourselves. And it's really our politics they object to, not HRC. Limbaugh also called for 'hunting down liberals with dogs.' I'm not going to keep company with those who will avoid HRC because of fear of Rush.

People should understand why his first target was HRC, and it was NOT because of the slurs we see her being assailed with people who purport to be Democrats but may not be, who say 'both parties are the same.' They are telling the truth, if they are Libertarian or Communist, whose ideology says Democrats and Republicans are a failure, so don't vote for them because it's not what they want.

We are better known by our enemies than our fair weather friends.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm sorry, but "she would be the first female president" isn't a reason to support her. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2015 #1
You did not understand what I was trying to say QuestionAlways Mar 2015 #2
im with you there it's all about scotus - that's why it doesnt matter who's the democratic nominee Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #82
+1 darkangel218 Mar 2015 #84
agreed. I am not going to prove the OP wrong roguevalley Mar 2015 #88
really? politicman Mar 2015 #3
i think her choice for scotus will be better than president walker's picks Romeo.lima333 Mar 2015 #5
There will not be a "President Walker" MNBrewer Mar 2015 #16
great argument: our candidate is getting doantions from them to actually stop them donating? politicman Mar 2015 #64
She will never run again for political office after this QuestionAlways Mar 2015 #7
do you think the 1% are so dumb as to donate heavuily to a candidate that would not benefit them? politicman Mar 2015 #67
"She voted for the war in Iraq, but I don't care..." MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #6
I volunteered for the Draft during Vietnam because QuestionAlways Mar 2015 #9
Most elected Democrats voted against invading Iraq MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #11
no kidding ellennelle Mar 2015 #15
And she learned nothing MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #23
She did what she thought was right at the time QuestionAlways Mar 2015 #22
No, she did what she thought was right for her political ambitions Broward Mar 2015 #25
Bernie and Warren did what they thought may excite their political Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #27
And what, exactly, was that a resolution to do? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #31
Hillary gave her reasons for voting for the IWR also, Bush was supposed to exhaust Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #43
Are you claiming that Warren and Sanders voted to not attack ISIS? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #45
They voted NO on the ISIS Resolution, you can go on with any reasons you want, I look at their Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #47
Strange. You seem unable to discuss what was actually in that resolution. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #52
Oh, give me a break! John Poet Mar 2015 #100
And besides that, John Poet Mar 2015 #101
Then their conscience is questionable in handling affairs of security. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #107
This is what I've always believed. bigwillq Mar 2015 #32
57% of Congressional Democrats voted against going to war against Iraq MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #29
And they were all wrong as well. Shoulders of Giants Mar 2015 #66
She did what she thought would keep the wing nut media off her case tularetom Mar 2015 #104
In the Senate 58% of Democrats voted for it... Agschmid Mar 2015 #71
Well, this might be where you went wrong: F4lconF16 Mar 2015 #28
My jaw's still on the floor. Iggo Mar 2015 #102
You do realize it was Karl Rove who came up with "The Dems started the Iraq War and esp. Hillary" McCamy Taylor Mar 2015 #87
Are you claiming that I'm saying the same thing as Rove? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #96
You can add Honduras to Hillary's list of foreign fiascos Oilwellian Mar 2015 #95
Yikes. Somehow I missed her connection. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #97
well, that is "A" reason ellennelle Mar 2015 #8
Name a candidate who runs as a national candidate in the last decade or so is Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #30
isn't "the last decade" a bit of a slim window? ellennelle Mar 2015 #60
Barack Obama's top five contributors in 08 were Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase: DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #77
Congratulations ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #10
Didn't you get the memo? leftofcool Mar 2015 #46
Ohhh. That memo?!? ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #53
About "Commissioner" O'Malley Jim Lane Mar 2015 #92
And about last week's "Comissioner" Webb ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #94
Everyone reads a different subset of the posts on DU Jim Lane Mar 2015 #99
You're right. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #105
Spare us your victim complex. Jim Lane Mar 2015 #91
also too ellennelle Mar 2015 #12
So, if Warren ran... Helen Borg Mar 2015 #13
If warren ran, I would support her because she could win QuestionAlways Mar 2015 #41
But she may run... Helen Borg Mar 2015 #70
Not sufficient for me to support a rightie. As far a SCOTUS, I understand that factor, but GoneFishin Mar 2015 #14
I fully agree with your position SecularMotion Mar 2015 #17
Pro war, pro Wall Street, pro TPP, pro Keystone XL, pro H-1B visas, member of "The Family". Scuba Mar 2015 #18
Ditto to what Scuba said... SoapBox Mar 2015 #33
Pro-fracking also peacebird Mar 2015 #37
Ditto to what Scuba said!!! Thespian2 Mar 2015 #51
The SCOTUS part is understandable. But any Democrat HappyMe Mar 2015 #19
Exactly. peacebird Mar 2015 #39
I laughed at the HappyMe Mar 2015 #42
yes! ellennelle Mar 2015 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #73
A corporatist is the last, best hope to save democracy? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2015 #20
Last hope to save Democracy? Geronimoe Mar 2015 #21
I don't vote for ANYONE because of their plumbing. 99Forever Mar 2015 #24
I vote for plumbing. John Poet Mar 2015 #103
You're not wrong....we're always right to support Hillary. ileus Mar 2015 #26
I'll vote for her if she's the nominee... but 2 words regarding female leaders: The Green Manalishi Mar 2015 #34
Im now hoping Hillary decides not to run.. DCBob Mar 2015 #35
Don't and Won't yellowwoodII Mar 2015 #36
That may be enough for you. It's not enough for me. Autumn Mar 2015 #38
Have you ever visited Texas? TBF Mar 2015 #40
HRC - Is An Economic Royalist - She Represents The 1% - She Is The Last Person To Save Democracy cantbeserious Mar 2015 #44
Seriously? leftofcool Mar 2015 #49
This isn't against HRC being rich, or Liz Warren for being rich RiverLover Mar 2015 #55
Does Not Change What HRC Is - An Economic Royalist cantbeserious Mar 2015 #85
Gee, I got that information months and months ago - from a rabid RW acquaintance. djean111 Mar 2015 #89
It is jaw dropping to see how many and how quickly so many Democrats adopted that exact TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #90
I don't think there would be any change HoosierCowboy Mar 2015 #48
Well I will make a prediction. zeemike Mar 2015 #50
How dare you support Hillary Clinton! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #54
Not fit for duty Geronimoe Mar 2015 #56
Your second reason is why we want a Democrat. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #57
I Support Hillary Clinton also santroy79 Mar 2015 #58
and this no Hillary and support Warren talk? santroy79 Mar 2015 #59
I am a Liberal and a Democrat, and I support Hillary. 0nirevets Mar 2015 #62
the notion that women as a voting block will support HRC... ms liberty Mar 2015 #63
Hillary will mobilize right-wingers Cosmic Kitten Mar 2015 #65
As several others have already pointed out, SheilaT Mar 2015 #68
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #83
Even I don't buy that... Agschmid Mar 2015 #69
Then you would support Claire McCaskill? Motown_Johnny Mar 2015 #72
Here is an link to an article about the Keystone pipeline decision at State while HRC was Secretary. greatlaurel Mar 2015 #74
She supported an International War Crime BubbaFett Mar 2015 #75
So did 58% of our Senate at the time... Agschmid Mar 2015 #80
I am a woman, love to see one be president, but if it isn't Warren's time, I don't want a token mother earth Mar 2015 #76
My ideal outcome in 2017: Any Democrat. If HRC gets the nod, I will take extreme pleasure... freshwest Mar 2015 #78
Nah, that douchebag would like nothing more than to see Hillary elected tularetom Mar 2015 #106
You are free to support anyone you want Marrah_G Mar 2015 #79
So women blindly vote for the candidate with a vagina? jeff47 Mar 2015 #81
Yes, we need a woman president. And women support her 2 to 3. McCamy Taylor Mar 2015 #86
You're wrong because your voting on you're feelings ram2008 Mar 2015 #93
What makes you believe that Clinton will abandon the 1%? demwing Mar 2015 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why I Support Hillary Cli...»Reply #78