Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)24. Re-read the last paragraph.
Clinton could have made an error. Or not. We don't know because people are screaming about regulations, and then screaming that those regulations weren't in force so we must ignore the entire scandal.
There is a potential problem, depending on how much she had her people "go it alone".
You're believing some partisan fuck at the NYT, and not the Archivist of the United States--who said she did nothing wrong, nothing "illegal" and has made no "mistakes."
No. Read the fucking post.
The NYT said nothing about the security problems or typosquatter. The NYT's angle was the law that was not in force. How, exactly, am I believing the NYT when the NYT NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING?
Seriously, stop with the fucking moronic changing of the subject.
She did not transmit ANY classified material.
Yay, she didn't commit a felony. Yet again, does not change that other countries were likely reading her email.
And no one broke into her email and sent it to Wikileaks, did they?
Why would China and Russia send her email to wikileaks?
You're buying a load of bullshit served up to you by people who wish her ill.
No, you aren't bothering to read what I write, and are blindly making assumptions because then you don't have to respond to the actual problems with her email system.
I'll believe the archivist of the US about the legality of her conduct before I believe jeff47 on the internet, sorry.
Quote where I said she broke the law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]
OKNancy
Mar 2015
OP
So if anyone ever screws something up, that excuses all behavior from that point on?
jeff47
Mar 2015
#19
But Clinton didn't screw anything up--you're buying off on rightwing smears and bullshit.
MADem
Mar 2015
#23
You're saying she "made an error" when there were no regulations in place where she might have
MADem
Mar 2015
#31
Interesting that anything that favors Hillary only gets minimal number of responses,
Beacool
Mar 2015
#8
the only reason there are even that many is that the admins put it on the DU homepage
OKNancy
Mar 2015
#11
That's because the Archivist of the United States has said "This was a bullshit story."
MADem
Mar 2015
#25
I recall that. She knew it then & now. Same thing they didi to Bill Clinton they'll do to her.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#28
No, your point was not clear. I thought you were referencing watchdog agencies, not networks.
MADem
Mar 2015
#37
They will show up as soon they get their new talking points from Free Republic.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#29