Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
24. Re-read the last paragraph.
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 01:27 PM
Mar 2015

Clinton could have made an error. Or not. We don't know because people are screaming about regulations, and then screaming that those regulations weren't in force so we must ignore the entire scandal.

There is a potential problem, depending on how much she had her people "go it alone".

You're believing some partisan fuck at the NYT, and not the Archivist of the United States--who said she did nothing wrong, nothing "illegal" and has made no "mistakes."

No. Read the fucking post.

The NYT said nothing about the security problems or typosquatter. The NYT's angle was the law that was not in force. How, exactly, am I believing the NYT when the NYT NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING?

Seriously, stop with the fucking moronic changing of the subject.

She did not transmit ANY classified material.

Yay, she didn't commit a felony. Yet again, does not change that other countries were likely reading her email.

And no one broke into her email and sent it to Wikileaks, did they?

Why would China and Russia send her email to wikileaks?

You're buying a load of bullshit served up to you by people who wish her ill.

No, you aren't bothering to read what I write, and are blindly making assumptions because then you don't have to respond to the actual problems with her email system.

I'll believe the archivist of the US about the legality of her conduct before I believe jeff47 on the internet, sorry.

Quote where I said she broke the law.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just follow the AP trail to Rethug headquarters. Wellstone ruled Mar 2015 #1
Fournier probably called in a favor. Renew Deal Mar 2015 #17
A certain thread of that trail comes right to DU Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #35
The Tribue did the same thing to Clinton after the New Hampshire primary. McCamy Taylor Mar 2015 #2
SSDD riqster Mar 2015 #3
Yes, I new all along the Hillary Email was a fake story!! Thanks lewebley3 Mar 2015 #4
Yup. The NY Times & AP's failure to issue a retraction is outrageous. SunSeeker Mar 2015 #5
Within a very short time of this story breaking..... NCTraveler Mar 2015 #6
There are people here on DU still flogging this big lie. MADem Mar 2015 #10
Yeah, facts like misconfiguring the security on the server. jeff47 Mar 2015 #12
Well, Assange got his hands on State Dept. cables and message traffic. MADem Mar 2015 #13
So if anyone ever screws something up, that excuses all behavior from that point on? jeff47 Mar 2015 #19
But Clinton didn't screw anything up--you're buying off on rightwing smears and bullshit. MADem Mar 2015 #23
Re-read the last paragraph. jeff47 Mar 2015 #24
You're saying she "made an error" when there were no regulations in place where she might have MADem Mar 2015 #31
Do you need the link to hooked on phonics? jeff47 Mar 2015 #34
Ahhh...we're down to "personal insult!" That was quick! MADem Mar 2015 #36
No need to insult you, you're doing a great job on your own. jeff47 Mar 2015 #39
So--answer this question--if there was "no need" then why did you do it? MADem Mar 2015 #40
... hopemountain Mar 2015 #45
please, it is IDIOTS on DU Skittles Mar 2015 #52
All I can say is that anyone still expressing poutrage after being so decisively MADem Mar 2015 #54
Someone asked on another thread why we are supposed to hate Hillary NancyDL Mar 2015 #7
Interesting that anything that favors Hillary only gets minimal number of responses, Beacool Mar 2015 #8
the only reason there are even that many is that the admins put it on the DU homepage OKNancy Mar 2015 #11
I came into this thread murielm99 Mar 2015 #15
That's because the Archivist of the United States has said "This was a bullshit story." MADem Mar 2015 #25
K&R! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #9
Thanks for posting this. betsuni Mar 2015 #14
Oh great, now there's a conspiracy theory that the Obama administration betsuni Mar 2015 #16
vast right wing conspiracy. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2015 #18
I recall that. She knew it then & now. Same thing they didi to Bill Clinton they'll do to her. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #28
If only someone was around a few decades ago to care about the media and how they Rex Mar 2015 #20
You never heard of Media Matters? BainsBane Mar 2015 #21
You never heard of NBC/ABC/CBS/Fox/CNN? Rex Mar 2015 #22
Your point was NOT clear. MADem Mar 2015 #26
For decades and decades this has been going on, my point was very clear. Rex Mar 2015 #33
No, your point was not clear. I thought you were referencing watchdog agencies, not networks. MADem Mar 2015 #37
"What I'm about to describe is how the media can create its own misinformation" Rex Mar 2015 #42
You also said this: MADem Mar 2015 #43
I see, sorry an attempt at sarcasm. Failsauce on my part. Rex Mar 2015 #46
We're good, never worry. MADem Mar 2015 #47
My mother is one of those women. Rex Mar 2015 #48
A lot of the people who are like your parents were here in 2001, but they left. MADem Mar 2015 #49
I think she has a critical role to fill right now taking on Wall Street. Rex Mar 2015 #50
Waiting for responses from the Hillary haters leftofcool Mar 2015 #27
They will show up as soon they get their new talking points from Free Republic. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #29
Yep! leftofcool Mar 2015 #30
I have most of them on my ignore list. DU is a much kinder place. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #32
I think most of them have been shamed into silence with pesky facts. MADem Mar 2015 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author Skittles Mar 2015 #53
.... DeSwiss Mar 2015 #41
LOL OKNancy Mar 2015 #44
We ask the question.... HoosierCowboy Mar 2015 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Emailgate: How media mist...»Reply #24