Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)25. That's because the Archivist of the United States has said "This was a bullshit story."
If they keep screeching "Oh, the Huge Manatee" over what, at the end of the day, was NOTHING, they'll reveal their bias for just what it is.
...assertions from the New York Times and others that different records rules applied to Clinton than to her predecessors is wrong, since the National Archives and Records Administration did not issue guidance updating its rules until fall 2013, months after she left office. The same rules applied to Clinton as had applied to Powell.
While NARAs preference is that officials not use an e-mail alias, Archivist of the United States David Ferriero said in sworn testimony in 2013 that nothing in the law that prohibits them.
We dont care how many accounts you have as long as those on which youre doing federal business are captured for the record, he also said.
Responding to a department request for documents from recent secretaries of state, Clintons team provided over 55,000 pages of e-mails, which the Clinton aide said included anything that pertained to her work there. Personal conversations such as e-mails with her daughter Chelsea about flower arrangements for her 2010 wedding were not included. But any correspondence with the 100 State Department officials with whom she regularly corresponded would have already been stored on the departments servers and Clintons office made sure to replicate all of those e-mails. In all, 9 out of 10 e-mails that Clinton sent during her time at the State Department went to colleagues there.
While NARAs preference is that officials not use an e-mail alias, Archivist of the United States David Ferriero said in sworn testimony in 2013 that nothing in the law that prohibits them.
We dont care how many accounts you have as long as those on which youre doing federal business are captured for the record, he also said.
Responding to a department request for documents from recent secretaries of state, Clintons team provided over 55,000 pages of e-mails, which the Clinton aide said included anything that pertained to her work there. Personal conversations such as e-mails with her daughter Chelsea about flower arrangements for her 2010 wedding were not included. But any correspondence with the 100 State Department officials with whom she regularly corresponded would have already been stored on the departments servers and Clintons office made sure to replicate all of those e-mails. In all, 9 out of 10 e-mails that Clinton sent during her time at the State Department went to colleagues there.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-03-03/hillary-clinton-camp-pushes-back-on-email-story
"Recent secretaries..." -- funny how CLINTON is the only one of the "recent secretaries" catching heat, here. As Gomer says, sur-prize, sur-prize.
It's getting a little OLD, IMO, this relentless invention of poutrages. And the people who keep pounding that old drum are doing nothing but showing their own hands.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]
OKNancy
Mar 2015
OP
So if anyone ever screws something up, that excuses all behavior from that point on?
jeff47
Mar 2015
#19
But Clinton didn't screw anything up--you're buying off on rightwing smears and bullshit.
MADem
Mar 2015
#23
You're saying she "made an error" when there were no regulations in place where she might have
MADem
Mar 2015
#31
Interesting that anything that favors Hillary only gets minimal number of responses,
Beacool
Mar 2015
#8
the only reason there are even that many is that the admins put it on the DU homepage
OKNancy
Mar 2015
#11
That's because the Archivist of the United States has said "This was a bullshit story."
MADem
Mar 2015
#25
I recall that. She knew it then & now. Same thing they didi to Bill Clinton they'll do to her.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#28
No, your point was not clear. I thought you were referencing watchdog agencies, not networks.
MADem
Mar 2015
#37
They will show up as soon they get their new talking points from Free Republic.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#29