General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)"erred." You're the one screaming about "problems" without any justification. Why aren't you screeching about Powell's "problems?" Or Condi's? Hmmm.
There are no "problems" because it's not up to you to decide how she wants to run her PERSONAL, paid-for-by-herself-and-not-you-or-the-American-taxpayers email system.
And it was Private Manning who gave the State Department cables to wikileaks, not the Russians or Chinese.
And you don't know if she used encryption, or not on some or all of her emails. You just don't know. Yet you're first in line to continue to crab about "errors" and "problems."
That's like saying you don't like the way she took notes, or you don't like her "tone" or something. There were no controlling regulations, rules, guidance or anything of the sort with regard to her own UNCLASSIFIED, PERSONAL email system--which the Archivist of the US said is not "illegal" to use. Even if you don't like it. You didn't have to say she "broke the law" -- your use of terms like "err" and "problem" makes it very clear that you think what she did was WRONG--even though the guy who is the controlling authority on these matters says otherwise.
Your bias is clear when you use that kind of language.