Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)39. No need to insult you, you're doing a great job on your own.
You still haven't managed to quote where I say she broke the law or any regulations. So quote where I said she broke the law or any regulations.
What kind of "computer security" does she need for unclassified emails on servers that were not in her basement
Post your email username and password. You don't have unclassified email, so there's no problem with anyone else looking through your email, right?
If you'd prefer something related to her job, there's going to be information that is helpful to a foreign government but not classified. Repeated discussions between the SoS and France and Germany before making a public statement about sanctions on Russia would let Russia know there is a conflict about sanctions between these countries. Not classified, but helpful to Russia's government.
She was using a commercial outfit -- her system wasn't "homebrew" and it wasn't in her house, even
She used an ISP that offers hosting. We don't know how much they did and how much Clinton's staff did. That company could have done everything, or that company could have provided a spot in their server rack for a Clinton-staff-managed computer, or somewhere in between.
That's why I decry the stupidity of screaming about regulations. Because we do not know which option she took.
At which point you started screaming about regulations.
Choosing to have the pros operate her email shows good judgement, and is a great weapon against anyone claiming she was trying to control information. It's still dumber than having the government do it - State can ask the NSA to audit their security.
Having her staff plug in a computer they control shows poor judgement on security, and fuels claims she was trying to control information. We don't know which happened.
And your dire link goes to a white page. Nothing. Nada. Zip. No placeholder. Not that this would "prove" anything, anyway. So frickin what?
It shows the DNS entry still exists. Otherwise, you would have received a message that the web site could not be found.
Again--State Department emails ended up at wikileaks. Clinton's emails did NOT.
Why would China and Russia give Clinton's emails to wikileaks?
Also, Wikileaks got the emails from an insider explicitly giving them to Wikileaks. No hacking involoved. But hey, let's keep talking about that as proof of security so you don't have to bother your beautiful mind about this incident. Just blindly dismiss it all.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Emailgate: How media mistakes created Hillary Clinton's fake, fake identity [View all]
OKNancy
Mar 2015
OP
So if anyone ever screws something up, that excuses all behavior from that point on?
jeff47
Mar 2015
#19
But Clinton didn't screw anything up--you're buying off on rightwing smears and bullshit.
MADem
Mar 2015
#23
You're saying she "made an error" when there were no regulations in place where she might have
MADem
Mar 2015
#31
Interesting that anything that favors Hillary only gets minimal number of responses,
Beacool
Mar 2015
#8
the only reason there are even that many is that the admins put it on the DU homepage
OKNancy
Mar 2015
#11
That's because the Archivist of the United States has said "This was a bullshit story."
MADem
Mar 2015
#25
I recall that. She knew it then & now. Same thing they didi to Bill Clinton they'll do to her.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#28
No, your point was not clear. I thought you were referencing watchdog agencies, not networks.
MADem
Mar 2015
#37
They will show up as soon they get their new talking points from Free Republic.
misterhighwasted
Mar 2015
#29