Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
4. David Brock reflects on his Clinton evolution
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 08:56 AM
Mar 2015


"...Hating the Clintons has long been an industry, complete with books, movies and paraphernalia dating to Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential run. It was within that industry that Brock first developed a career.

Brock, now 51, was a conservative reporter and writer who famously penned a book casting doubts on the credibility of Anita Hill, who accused now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. He later did reporting that first introduced America to the name Paula Jones, the woman who, in the scandal known as Troopergate, accused Bill Clinton of harassment during his days in Arkansas, where he served as governor.

But then came his efforts to write a book about Hillary Clinton, who once complained of a “vast right-wing conspiracy” working against the couple. He intended the book as a hit piece, but the project converted him instead to a Clinton supporter, and soon he publicly disavowed his earlier attacks on the pair.

Brock declined to discuss his relationship with the former president or the former secretary of state, who lost out on the White House to Barack Obama in 2008. Yet his appearance in Little Rock on Tuesday is further evidence of how far inside their orbit he has traveled since becoming an ally after Bill Clinton left office. He is known to have close ties to some top Clinton aides and donors..."



~snip~

In the interview with POLITICO, Brock said his own research eventually changed his mind about the Clintons.
“What led to my change of views about the Clintons was working through the research and writing on the book on Hillary,” he said of the 1997 book, which other conservatives viewed as treating the then-first lady too gently.

“And I went into that with a very negative agenda and after doing all the work on it for a couple of years I came out of it with a much more positive view of her, and so the transition … really worked itself out through that book.”

After "The Seduction of Hillary Rodham" was published, Brock wrote an apologia in Esquire magazine, saying he was finished with the career he’d led in the 1990s. A year later, he wrote a follow-up piece apologizing to Clinton (he ultimately did the same with Anita Hill).


http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/david-brock-bill-clinton-hillary-clinton-104976.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Really, really interesting article, Segami RiverLover Mar 2015 #1
"...If Clinton wants to rebuild trust with voters.. Segami Mar 2015 #2
Its too bad Media Matters is run by Hillary's David Brock. RiverLover Mar 2015 #3
David Brock reflects on his Clinton evolution Segami Mar 2015 #4
that explains a lot. transactionalism at its best. nashville_brook Mar 2015 #5
I was really surprised when I learned that, from a fellow DUer RiverLover Mar 2015 #21
i'm sure there's a historical narrative about Brock's switch from conservative to nashville_brook Mar 2015 #22
Hillary already had a real primary challenge in 2003. So real, she lost. phantom power Mar 2015 #6
Unfortunately Warren is NOT running..... we need to get that fact into our heads groundloop Mar 2015 #7
I want a viable more progressive candidate Cryptoad Mar 2015 #15
Segami, here's my thing on Hillary... nashville_brook Mar 2015 #8
most excellent! ellennelle Mar 2015 #9
actually moved to Flori-duh :) nashville_brook Mar 2015 #10
Couldn't have said it better myself. Even if I thought Ms Clinton would fight for the Nay Mar 2015 #12
if the voters aren't excited about the nominee...if it's just "her time" nashville_brook Mar 2015 #16
Agreed. It's not hard to see that Dem voters aren't showing up because they feel Nay Mar 2015 #25
Agreed. And too think.. Segami Mar 2015 #14
oppo research on the Clintons is a corporate endeavor at this point. nashville_brook Mar 2015 #17
What is next on DU Cryptoad Mar 2015 #11
Imagine being in a fight with your worst enemy. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #23
I don't want a 'curbed' or 'reined in' candidate by any name HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #13
The problem as I see it is sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #20
I think if Elizabeth Warren chose to get in, she would be a viable contender. Vinca Mar 2015 #18
Exactly! RiverLover Mar 2015 #24
this is *the* gail sheehy? has she no editors? are all papers computer-generated these days? ND-Dem Mar 2015 #19
Same old same old, nothing new here, nothing here to promote Warren, nothing for anyone to put their Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #26
In 2012, the New York Daily News endorsed Romney Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary's Only Hope To Ta...»Reply #4