Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why I Support Hillary Clinton (show me where I am wrong) [View all]Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)95. You can add Honduras to Hillary's list of foreign fiascos
In a recent op-ed in The Washington Post, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a review of Henry Kissingers latest book, World Order, to lay out her vision for sustaining Americas leadership in the world. In the midst of numerous global crises, she called for return to a foreign policy with purpose, strategy and pragmatism. She also highlighted some of these policy choices in her memoir Hard Choices and how they contributed to the challenges that Barack Obamas administration now faces.
The chapter on Latin America, particularly the section on Honduras, a major source of the child migrants currently pouring into the United States, has gone largely unnoticed. In letters to Clinton and her successor, John Kerry, more than 100 members of Congress have repeatedly warned about the deteriorating security situation in Honduras, especially since the 2009 military coup that ousted the countrys democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. As Honduran scholar Dana Frank points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries, opening the door for further violence and anarchy.
The homicide rate in Honduras, already the highest in the world, increased by 50 percent from 2008 to 2011; political repression, the murder of opposition political candidates, peasant organizers and LGBT activists increased and continue to this day. Femicides skyrocketed. The violence and insecurity were exacerbated by a generalized institutional collapse. Drug-related violence has worsened amid allegations of rampant corruption in Honduras police and government. While the gangs are responsible for much of the violence, Honduran security forces have engaged in a wave of killings and other human rights crimes with impunity.
Despite this, however, both under Clinton and Kerry, the State Departments response to the violence and military and police impunity has largely been silence, along with continued U.S. aid to Honduran security forces. In Hard Choices, Clinton describes her role in the aftermath of the coup that brought about this dire situation. Her firsthand account is significant both for the confession of an important truth and for a crucial false testimony.
First, the confession: Clinton admits that she used the power of her office to make sure that Zelaya would not return to office.
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html
The chapter on Latin America, particularly the section on Honduras, a major source of the child migrants currently pouring into the United States, has gone largely unnoticed. In letters to Clinton and her successor, John Kerry, more than 100 members of Congress have repeatedly warned about the deteriorating security situation in Honduras, especially since the 2009 military coup that ousted the countrys democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. As Honduran scholar Dana Frank points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries, opening the door for further violence and anarchy.
The homicide rate in Honduras, already the highest in the world, increased by 50 percent from 2008 to 2011; political repression, the murder of opposition political candidates, peasant organizers and LGBT activists increased and continue to this day. Femicides skyrocketed. The violence and insecurity were exacerbated by a generalized institutional collapse. Drug-related violence has worsened amid allegations of rampant corruption in Honduras police and government. While the gangs are responsible for much of the violence, Honduran security forces have engaged in a wave of killings and other human rights crimes with impunity.
Despite this, however, both under Clinton and Kerry, the State Departments response to the violence and military and police impunity has largely been silence, along with continued U.S. aid to Honduran security forces. In Hard Choices, Clinton describes her role in the aftermath of the coup that brought about this dire situation. Her firsthand account is significant both for the confession of an important truth and for a crucial false testimony.
First, the confession: Clinton admits that she used the power of her office to make sure that Zelaya would not return to office.
http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html
Anyone who admires Henry Kissinger, is not a Democrat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sorry, but "she would be the first female president" isn't a reason to support her.
Spider Jerusalem
Mar 2015
#1
im with you there it's all about scotus - that's why it doesnt matter who's the democratic nominee
Romeo.lima333
Mar 2015
#4
i think her choice for scotus will be better than president walker's picks
Romeo.lima333
Mar 2015
#5
great argument: our candidate is getting doantions from them to actually stop them donating?
politicman
Mar 2015
#64
do you think the 1% are so dumb as to donate heavuily to a candidate that would not benefit them?
politicman
Mar 2015
#67
Hillary gave her reasons for voting for the IWR also, Bush was supposed to exhaust
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#43
They voted NO on the ISIS Resolution, you can go on with any reasons you want, I look at their
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#47
Strange. You seem unable to discuss what was actually in that resolution.
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2015
#52
You do realize it was Karl Rove who came up with "The Dems started the Iraq War and esp. Hillary"
McCamy Taylor
Mar 2015
#87
Name a candidate who runs as a national candidate in the last decade or so is
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#30
Barack Obama's top five contributors in 08 were Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase:
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#77
Not sufficient for me to support a rightie. As far a SCOTUS, I understand that factor, but
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#14
Pro war, pro Wall Street, pro TPP, pro Keystone XL, pro H-1B visas, member of "The Family".
Scuba
Mar 2015
#18
I'll vote for her if she's the nominee... but 2 words regarding female leaders:
The Green Manalishi
Mar 2015
#34
HRC - Is An Economic Royalist - She Represents The 1% - She Is The Last Person To Save Democracy
cantbeserious
Mar 2015
#44
Gee, I got that information months and months ago - from a rabid RW acquaintance.
djean111
Mar 2015
#89
It is jaw dropping to see how many and how quickly so many Democrats adopted that exact
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#90
Here is an link to an article about the Keystone pipeline decision at State while HRC was Secretary.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#74
I am a woman, love to see one be president, but if it isn't Warren's time, I don't want a token
mother earth
Mar 2015
#76
My ideal outcome in 2017: Any Democrat. If HRC gets the nod, I will take extreme pleasure...
freshwest
Mar 2015
#78