Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nay

(12,051 posts)
25. Agreed. It's not hard to see that Dem voters aren't showing up because they feel
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 09:05 PM
Mar 2015

no one represents them. If Dem leaders cared, they'd look at your poll results and say to themselves, "Why, here's a problem! We aren't doing what our bedrock constituency wants, and that's why they're not voting for us. Maybe we should go back to our progressive roots!"

But they don't do that. In fact, they are still running away from the stuff Warren and Sanders say every day. Why is that, I wonder? IMO, it's because they are, philosophically, not progressive or liberal any more. They are something else, and all that hippie stuff makes them uncomfortable because their friends in high places don't like it.

Look at the Republicans. They can lead their band of ignoramuses straight off a cliff. The dem base is not stupid enough to follow anybody who displays a D after his/her name; if we were dumb, we'd be Republicans. Dem leadership actually has to offer to work for something we want, AND be credible in their presentation so that dem voters will actually believe that that person will work hard to deliver on it. I thought Obama might be the one, but when he had a RW preacher to speak, and then appointed Geithner, I knew he was a go-along pretender. Now, the dem base is looking deeply into the backgrounds of all Dem contenders. If they can't show a definite progressive attitude in their associations, their promotion of progressive policy over 1% policy, etc., in their lifetime of public service, then we won't vote for them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Really, really interesting article, Segami RiverLover Mar 2015 #1
"...If Clinton wants to rebuild trust with voters.. Segami Mar 2015 #2
Its too bad Media Matters is run by Hillary's David Brock. RiverLover Mar 2015 #3
David Brock reflects on his Clinton evolution Segami Mar 2015 #4
that explains a lot. transactionalism at its best. nashville_brook Mar 2015 #5
I was really surprised when I learned that, from a fellow DUer RiverLover Mar 2015 #21
i'm sure there's a historical narrative about Brock's switch from conservative to nashville_brook Mar 2015 #22
Hillary already had a real primary challenge in 2003. So real, she lost. phantom power Mar 2015 #6
Unfortunately Warren is NOT running..... we need to get that fact into our heads groundloop Mar 2015 #7
I want a viable more progressive candidate Cryptoad Mar 2015 #15
Segami, here's my thing on Hillary... nashville_brook Mar 2015 #8
most excellent! ellennelle Mar 2015 #9
actually moved to Flori-duh :) nashville_brook Mar 2015 #10
Couldn't have said it better myself. Even if I thought Ms Clinton would fight for the Nay Mar 2015 #12
if the voters aren't excited about the nominee...if it's just "her time" nashville_brook Mar 2015 #16
Agreed. It's not hard to see that Dem voters aren't showing up because they feel Nay Mar 2015 #25
Agreed. And too think.. Segami Mar 2015 #14
oppo research on the Clintons is a corporate endeavor at this point. nashville_brook Mar 2015 #17
What is next on DU Cryptoad Mar 2015 #11
Imagine being in a fight with your worst enemy. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #23
I don't want a 'curbed' or 'reined in' candidate by any name HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #13
The problem as I see it is sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #20
I think if Elizabeth Warren chose to get in, she would be a viable contender. Vinca Mar 2015 #18
Exactly! RiverLover Mar 2015 #24
this is *the* gail sheehy? has she no editors? are all papers computer-generated these days? ND-Dem Mar 2015 #19
Same old same old, nothing new here, nothing here to promote Warren, nothing for anyone to put their Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #26
In 2012, the New York Daily News endorsed Romney Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary's Only Hope To Ta...»Reply #25