Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Two words ffr Mar 2015 #1
cable providers should move the Fox channel from the news category to the procon Mar 2015 #16
The sooner they get stripped of News from fox the better it will be for everyone. Hutzpa Mar 2015 #2
Is someone regulating FOXNews? JaneyVee Mar 2015 #3
Yes, you are correct. Murdoch is the propaganda arm of the Global Corporate Power brokers. News is sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #4
YES. They need to be classified differently. calimary Mar 2015 #43
Well, that would require a regulatory body being able to regulate Scootaloo Mar 2015 #5
This is the kind of nonsense that anything with the word Democrat in its name should be ashamed of. CBGLuthier Mar 2015 #6
That is valid only up to a point DFW Mar 2015 #9
No, Fox News didn't go to court to defend their right to lie SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #12
Internet Myth: Fox did not defend the right to call themselves News. onenote Mar 2015 #25
X+10 840high Mar 2015 #34
No. NYC Liberal Mar 2015 #7
Not regulated, just not a news channel. Rex Mar 2015 #8
Most MSM channels fit the description of propaganda channels: they call it "the narrative" Wella Mar 2015 #10
No. Should we also regulate EWTN (the Catholic Cable channel) and the 700 Club? progressoid Mar 2015 #11
Cringingly embarrassing, anti-First Amendment nonsense. Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #13
There is something that should be opposed JonLP24 Mar 2015 #44
The biggest problem is no one can define exactly what is "news." Archae Mar 2015 #14
There's no way to regulate it treestar Mar 2015 #15
Fairness Doctrine. Enforce divestiture. Break up media monoliths. Orsino Mar 2015 #19
The Fairness a Doctrine only applied to broadcast channels not cable. n/t tammywammy Mar 2015 #20
Since a new one would have to be created anyway, why would we omit cable? n/t Orsino Mar 2015 #21
You'd want to expand the FCC's powers? tammywammy Mar 2015 #23
Fuck, yeah. Orsino Mar 2015 #24
Technically the media has no hold on us treestar Mar 2015 #31
I think you've just agreed that media do have an enormous hold on us. n/t Orsino Mar 2015 #32
Well, hell then. Let's include newspapers and the Internet while we're at it. onenote Mar 2015 #26
Yes. When I say to bust up media monoliths, I mean all of them. Orsino Mar 2015 #27
You seem to be contradicting yourself. progressoid Mar 2015 #30
No contradiction at all. Orsino Mar 2015 #33
I was referring to your call to impose the Fairness Doctrine on cable onenote Mar 2015 #38
DU is a customer, not an ISP, and certainly not a media monolith. Orsino Mar 2015 #39
So you are saying cable operators and ISPs should be required to transmit varying points of view onenote Mar 2015 #40
That's a fair sacrifice. Orsino Mar 2015 #42
Lots of hateful crap on religious TV, don't care for that but I do support the First Amendment Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #17
Agreed. What's that old saying? WillowTree Mar 2015 #29
How long before people learn the difference between over the air (TV/radio) and Cable that CK_John Mar 2015 #18
Two Words: First Amendment onenote Mar 2015 #22
Not this shit again. nt Codeine Mar 2015 #28
The First Amendment is either the law of the land or it is not. MineralMan Mar 2015 #35
The First Amendment says we can't do that. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #36
Alex, I'll take "Things that make DU look stupid" for $500 Throd Mar 2015 #37
Propaganda is bad for you JonLP24 Mar 2015 #41
This authoritarian drive to silence opponents with government power is beyond scary. tritsofme Mar 2015 #45
I'm appalled by how many can't see how this might be used against us at a future date. Throd Mar 2015 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fox News is not a news ch...»Reply #37