Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama White House Rips Senate Republicans For Their Treasonous Letter To Iran [View all]hisownpetard
(10,964 posts)35. Absolutely. They are subversives and
should be called out and treated as such. I mean, how dare they?
The rules are in place for a good reason. Can you imagine a Sarah Palin or a Ted Cruz
writing to a foreign government? God help us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama White House Rips Senate Republicans For Their Treasonous Letter To Iran [View all]
babylonsister
Mar 2015
OP
Read the Iranian reps reply to see how ignorant and uninformed Cotton is on our laws
bjobotts
Mar 2015
#102
Depends on what they said, promised, alleged. It is the closest thing to treason in
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#37
TEapartiers are representing their constitutents by scuttling a deal the president is
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#50
You are the one who said they are representing their constituents by sending this letter
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#52
Ahh, I figured I could get you there...First, what they are doing is ABHORRENT, as CLOSE TO TREASON
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#57
I see you admit you made a huge mistake, your response is that admission. I didnt alert
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#130
That isnt the point of this discussion, if you want to change the point and discuss your
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#125
I appreciate your input, you are not hijacking...I have just been called an anti semite
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#128
I looked up who the SEVEN senators are who didnt sign and I almost posted
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#133
What. do. American. Jews. have. to. do. with. this? That is a bizarre line of reasoning...
Hekate
Mar 2015
#81
He is the one who assumes that TeaParTY have a reason to oppose the Presidents negotiations
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#84
I'm wondering if the principle of Congressional immunity allows these 47 Senators to
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#117
Awesome find. I do wonder whether a letter might qualify as 'speech' broadly defined. But your
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#136
But that doesn't mean the rest of us can't use the "T-word." CALL 'em on it. MAKE 'em deny it.
calimary
Mar 2015
#26
International negotiations are ALWAYS handled by the executive branch. It's a simple concept. n/t
pampango
Mar 2015
#2
My point was that negotiations are an executive responsibility. I agree that ratification is a
pampango
Mar 2015
#83
WE are in a civil war, the only thing left is the shooting, I hope it doesnt start, dont
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#41
Yeah, I noticed that someone posted at the same time as me that they saw it on the news.
cui bono
Mar 2015
#39
If this isnt on EVERY single fucking SO CALLED newscast tonight then I am outta here
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#42
Glad I didnt see your post, I woulda yelled at you LOL, but think about the difference
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#43
Exactly, NJNP.. the mediawhore$ try to get the President on FAKE Scandals.. BFDiferrence.
Cha
Mar 2015
#88
My cousin invited me to a Facebook page that seemed designed for this one topic
arcane1
Mar 2015
#15
Amazing. It has taken an Iranian smackdown to make me feel better about this event.
Vinca
Mar 2015
#19
Reminds me of the way the Nixon campaign undercut Pres. Johnson's peace negotiations with Vietnam
hedda_foil
Mar 2015
#17
Back then Nixon & Kissinger should have been cited by Johnson/Humphrey for treason.
stuffmatters
Mar 2015
#29
LBJ could not cite Nixon's perfidy in public, b/c LBJ learned of Nixon's actions
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#120
Or how the media was all over Bill's blowjob when the report came out that the CIA
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#45
Has the Reagan-HW Bush connection to Iran ever been decisively proven or merely
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#122
Hey, it's not like they didn't do this before--to discredit Pres. Carter and bolster Pres. Reagan.
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2015
#31
Not exactly the first time for the GOP to do this. Goes back to Nixon in 1968, GHW Bush in '80.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#34
I just wish they would admit they want a civil war for real, they have been fighting one since
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#47
None call it treason, if a Repukes does it. If they do, people just nod and go on about their
Rex
Mar 2015
#49
Listening to news about this now, These MOTHERFUCKERS are basically declaring war
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#61
I suppose if and when someone commits an act that would be actionable under the Constitution.
onenote
Mar 2015
#70
I know. Somehow I don't think it quite means what people think it does. GOP is disgusting though
Hekate
Mar 2015
#111
61 percent of Americans polled favor a deal with Iran. That is a solid percent when you consider
Jefferson23
Mar 2015
#73
Here are the nuclear treaties between the Soviet Union (later, Russia) and the US...
Hekate
Mar 2015
#78
He described it as a feature of his strategy, not a bug. But, it is a "bug" a very large Kochroach.
Cha
Mar 2015
#86
Has anybody read the previously-redacted "PS" part of the letter? ***READ IT HERE!!***
nikto
Mar 2015
#103
We let Republicans get by with far too much antisocial, downright psychopathic
Jamastiene
Mar 2015
#104
The GOP seriously sound like fucking children. They will be an embarrassment in U.S. history.
C Moon
Mar 2015
#110