Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,560 posts)

11. "Possibly"

Tue May 1, 2012, 08:26 PM

May 2012

Yeah, i'll take that to mean we will keep some troops there after all. The MIC lobby always wins out on these types of things.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CLARIFICATION: US/Afghan agreement does NOT keep US troops in Afghanistan past 2014. [View all] TheWraith May 2012 OP

Thanks -- I was actually iffy on that point. nt gateley May 2012 #1

It doesn't help that MSNBC fucked up at first. TheWraith May 2012 #5

The NATO meeting in Chicago this month is going to agree to 2024. former9thward May 2012 #13

Careful, people don't want those pesky facts. Rosco T. May 2012 #2

That's the same line everybody kept repeating about Iraq. TheWraith May 2012 #4

Are we still spending money in Iraq? Cali_Democrat May 2012 #6

Well... WillyT May 2012 #7

Just like we left Iraq! MannyGoldstein May 2012 #8

Except that we, you know, left Iraq. TheWraith May 2012 #12

So what about Contractors ? bahrbearian May 2012 #15

"Possibly" Daniel537 May 2012 #11