General Discussion

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)

11. We were there 8 years as opposed to 11 in Afghanistan.

Tue May 1, 2012, 08:46 PM

May 2012

Lots more lives and money lost there as well. I just don't buy the doom and gloom coming from the neocons about Al-Qaeda taking over once again. Remember how strong they were in Iraq during the early years? By Panetta's own estimate Al-Qaeda has been reduced to third-party terrorist status is Afghanistan. I really don't understand why we need to keep pushing this thing so long. Almost seems to me that we're trying to redeem ourselves for Vietnam at this point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

President Obama's Speech Tonight - Your Opinion [View all] MineralMan May 2012 OP

Thanks for your votes. Keep 'em coming. MineralMan May 2012 #1

I think he did a good job. It was a bit vague, but it had to be. TheWraith May 2012 #2

We should have been out years ago. Daniel537 May 2012 #3

I think we should never have been there MineralMan May 2012 #4

We got out of Iraq pretty easily in the end Daniel537 May 2012 #7

It took too long, though, and the end result is not yet visible. MineralMan May 2012 #8

We were there 8 years as opposed to 11 in Afghanistan. Daniel537 May 2012 #11

And it was a much worse decision to go to Iraq. MineralMan May 2012 #12

The speech was very good as usual. MrSlayer May 2012 #5

Pitch perfect and reminded people that the Iraq war was not about Osama!! I want the troops home Pisces May 2012 #6

+1 JNelson6563 May 2012 #10

Good speech as always; bad policy. baldguy May 2012 #9

Not fast enough. Texasgal May 2012 #13