Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,314 posts)

13. What are you talking about with soldiers and nuclear weapons?

Tue Mar 10, 2015, 07:51 PM

Mar 2015

Not that the TeaPubliKlans aren't up for some war, I'm just not the bridge from their fever dreams to reality

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So what happens if talks with Iran fail because of the letter the GOP wrote? [View all] LynneSin Mar 2015 OP

Any treaty with Iran has to be ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate Lurks Often Mar 2015 #1

It may make a legal difference, the rest is semantics Lurks Often Mar 2015 #9

Not a treaty philosslayer Mar 2015 #6

Then expect it to end up in front of SCOTUS Lurks Often Mar 2015 #11

Republicans and the entire RW echo chamber will ... 11 Bravo Mar 2015 #3

As usual they will blame Obama's weak foreign policy. n/t TexasProgresive Mar 2015 #4

Even one of my Senators Aerows Mar 2015 #7

the treaty is not with the US; it's with half a dozen or so countries magical thyme Mar 2015 #8

It's not like the Senate goppers don't have a precedent. lpbk2713 Mar 2015 #12

What are you talking about with soldiers and nuclear weapons? TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #13