have it.
I think what you are really saying is "fuck transparency in government, it might prove inconvenient but I'd like to give the concept some passing lip service".
This not about everyone, it is about public servants acting in their official capacities and I don't get what is so terribly difficult to get about the concept, it was not something that had to be repeatedly explained until Hillary Clinton was at the center, folks seemed a hell of a lot clearer on the issue when it was TeaPubliKlan fraudsters in charge.
Folks are suddenly constitutionally unable to allow the concept that what Clinton did was not illegal yet was not the kind of handling that we wish to see and that isn't acceptable moving forward. No, now the whole fucking concept has to be irrelevant and silly because there can be no daylight between illegal and best practices and in fact no admission of anything less than stellar handling so not only wasn't it illegal but the concept of such being illegal has to be squashed too.
Fucking dishonest ass hypocrites that just like the crooked ass TeaPubliKlans could give a shit about all that high minded previous talk, it was strictly a weapon to attack the other side to be abandoned not actually lived.
I'm not getting some folks vision for the country at all, seems the most ardent supporters and prolific excuse makers for the surveillance state and total information awareness of us peons are the first out in front of public servants acting as their own holder, gatekeepers, and screeners of their public records, this seems inverted and dangerously insane.
A clear predilection for we the people to be subjects rather than citizens is what I see. Such is not a Democratic or a democratic value that I can recognize much less stomach.
= new reply since forum marked as read