Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]magical thyme
(14,881 posts)23. Per other posts, Boxer put her in her place. In which case, why the meltdown?
Really, you make it seem as though Mitchell succeeded in tearing down Hillary. Why give her that support?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
let me guess, she sides with the 47 senators and is skeptical of Hillary's explanation?
spanone
Mar 2015
#1
She hasn't mentioned the #47Traitors yet but yes on the Hillary-bashing. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2015
#4
Stupid alert: "Extremely sexist. Totally unnecessary vile language." What
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2015
#35
She sure as fuck did. But, was that twit Mitchell getting a clue? Fuck no. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2015
#20
Per other posts, Boxer put her in her place. In which case, why the meltdown?
magical thyme
Mar 2015
#23
Really?? You're making my comment out to be support of Mitchell? What an
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2015
#27
Despite all reason from Boxer, Mitchell just would not stop. Also, she has
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2015
#51
Now Mitchell is going back to when Hillary was First Lady to harp more on
ChisolmTrailDem
Mar 2015
#70