Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To lazy minded media - No, Dem visits to Syria were NOT the same as GOP letter. [View all]Sick_of_TP
(21 posts)40. Two totally different things
This involves other countries. By sending this letter it basically tells the other countries it's not up to the exec. branch to negotiate treaties with hostile countries. This was done to degrade the powers of OB because they consider him to not really be the pres. If you think otherwise, you haven't been watching for the last 6 years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To lazy minded media - No, Dem visits to Syria were NOT the same as GOP letter. [View all]
blm
Mar 2015
OP
The republicans didn't say their policy choices would supercede the WH either.
hughee99
Mar 2015
#21
Horsepoo - Try CONTEXT. It was KNOWN by then that Bush lied to Congress to invade Iraq.
blm
Mar 2015
#4
So there's a "just cause" exception to congress interfering in foreign policy?
hughee99
Mar 2015
#12
I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying there's no "he lied to us" exception to this rule.
hughee99
Mar 2015
#14
Does a speaker of the house need to publicly meet with the president of a foreign country to get
hughee99
Mar 2015
#17
She didn't need to go to Syria herself at all. There's no information she could have
hughee99
Mar 2015
#33
I wasn't in favor of Pitts going either unless it was sanctioned by the WH and state department.
hughee99
Mar 2015
#41
I love John Stewart, but he kind of appears to be "mailing it in" a little bit, with the
bullwinkle428
Mar 2015
#46